Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How bad is it? Depends on which nuclear expert you ask

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
steve2470 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 11:58 PM
Original message
How bad is it? Depends on which nuclear expert you ask
http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/asiapcf/03/15/japan.nuclear/

By the CNN Wire Staff
March 15, 2011 11:48 p.m. EDT

(CNN) -- Experts disagreed Tuesday over just how bad things have gotten at the stricken Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant in northeastern Japan, but all of them agreed that things could get worse.

An explosion Tuesday at the plant elevated the situation there to a "serious accident," on a level just below Chernobyl, a French nuclear official said, referring to the international scale that rates the severity of such incidents and to an incident 25 years ago in what is now Ukraine. His comments came before a fire was reported Wednesday in the No. 4 reactor building at the Japanese plant.

The International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale -- or INES -- ranks incidents from Level 1, which indicates very little danger to the general population, to Level 7, a "major accident" with a large release of radioactive material and widespread health and environmental effects.

"It's clear we are at Level 6, that's to say we're at a level in between what happened at Three Mile Island and Chernobyl," Andre-Claude Lacoste, president of France's nuclear safety authority, told reporters Tuesday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. See here for how bad it really is:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Just reading the comments alone I don't think I have the balls to listen to it!
Tonight, anyway....

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I recommend waiting till morning. Seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newest Reality Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yet,
we have some heavy-handed rationalists who jump on some bandwagon here and declare "preposterous" to this and that idea presented in the spirit of question and debate.

Why not get over the credentialism and overt serious nature of the whole thing and realize that, no matter how hard you try to pin down any ideas or facts as your bastion and stalwart towards refutation, there is a common ground we all could acknowledge and facts are few and theories abound, (no matter how you want to slice and dice and categorical them) and we are here to present and debate them as, for the most part, thinking equals who want to know the truth and not just support and control a particular issue.

I think we would all get along better and achieve much more if we can get more comfortable about it and present what we think and feel honestly in the light of understanding and balance. Feels good to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. That's the problem with nukes.
We won't really know the extent of the problem for years, when large numbers of people start developing cancer. That's the reality and the nightmare of nuclear energy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I think that we know it's bad enough NOW - it seems that they've abandoned their
efforts to try to prevent meltdowns to the reactors. Just heard Mike Malloy on the radio and he's playing CNN Live - apparently there are six reactors, I didn't realize that (one is bad enough).

Those poor people in Japan. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC