Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does anyone seriously expect an Obama primary challenge?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
pstokely Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:23 AM
Original message
Does anyone seriously expect an Obama primary challenge?
I don't blame them for wanting one, but they do seriously expect a challenger?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes. Go Dennis, go !!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. I wonder if Obama could get a challenge from the right of the Dems
maybe that would make him go left. :)

The problem is that O is prob as far right as any Dem out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 06:37 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Perhaps if he saw Dems....
...abandoning him for a candidate further left, he would get the message. Surely there is no Dem further right.

I believe (I really do!!!) that a speech along the lines below would win him MILLIONS of votes from Americans who now feel completely disenfranchised and don't vote at all.

Hypothetical speech by the President:

"I’m announcing today new direction for America, including:

Within 10 days I want Congress to pass new tax laws that spread the tax burden fairly across the economic spectrum, with those benefiting most from our society contributing commensurately.

Within 20 days I want Congress to pass laws that protect the right of workers to organize and have a voice in the operation of US businesses. This will include raising the minimum wage to $20.00 per hour to ensure a reasonable standard of living for all working families.

Within 30 days, all US military, diplomatic and contracted personnel will return from Iraq and Afghanistan. Instead of the hundreds of billions of dollars and thousands of lives being wasted on these wars, we will instead provide aid to these countries, and to other depressed areas where atrocious conditions breed terrorists.

Additionally, I am ordering the Department of Justice to investigate those who led us into these wars to determine if war crime charges are warranted. If so they will be prosecuted with vigor and any ill-gained profits shall be returned to the people.

Within 40 days I want Congress to pass a simple plan to provide Medicare for All so no American is denied care or has to suffer financial hardship because of health problems, and no American businesses are saddled with health costs that keep them from competing fairly with foreign competitors. This plan will include a “safety net” to guarantee every citizen is provided the food and shelter necessary to survive difficult challenges in their lives.

Within 60 days I want the Commerce Department to present a plan for maintaining and improving the infrastructure of our great country.

Within 80 days I want the Secretary of Education to present new plans to guarantee all Americans have access to our public schools, from pre-kindergarten through advanced degrees.

Within 120 days I want Homeland Security to present a new plan for securing our borders from those who would do us harm while allowing appropriate travel and visitation to our many friends around the world. This plan is to include a path to citizenship for those who serve in the US military, or who came here as children and are now productive members of our society.

Within 150 days I want a Constitutional Amendment passed prohibiting political spending by corporations or any other entity or individual not qualifying as a person with citizenship in this great country.

Within 180 days I want the Department of Energy to begin another “Manhattan Project” to enable us to cease our dependence on fossil fuels. As this effort will no doubt take time, I am announcing the nationalization of all US oil and gas reserves, as well as other reserves owned by the citizens of the US that are currently being extracted from our soil for private profit without regard for our environment.

I am also ordering the Department of Justice to begin immediately to root out crimes of corruption within our government. In concert with this, I want Congress to pass term-limit or other laws to ensure elected officials are serving for the benefit of the American people as a whole, not to gain wealth or power for themselves or their friends.

These and other policies we will put in place will cause a sea-change in how our country serves the citizens - We the People - rather than a tiny handful of super-wealthy who would subvert our democracy and plunder our wealth while denying even the most basic services for our citizens. Thank you for your support and thank you for standing up for the rights of all citizens."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoTimeToulouse Donating Member (204 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #16
32. Too late.

That is the kind of thing that Inaugural Obama should done. Far too late now for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. I don't.
I agree with Sanders that one is needed so Americans will quit living in a false paradigm or illusion there is a party on the right and a party on the left. A real discussion of policies and alternatives is needed in American discourse, not competing ideas within the same rhealm of economic and foreign policy constraints and solutions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. Well I didn't. Not until just today. When Obama cheerleads NukeCorp, then all bets off. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:55 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. See, that's the point.
One by one, he's taken active steps to piss-off each of
the core Democratic constituencies: the religiously-tolerant,
gays, women, labor, environmentalist, those working for
social justice, those seaking world peace, and so on.

Oh sure, Democrats will vote for him. But there's not going
to be anyone left in the Democratic coalition who'll actually
enthusiastically *WORK* for his campaign. And now that
Republicans are back in the ascendency, there's no need
for the corporate elite to donate any money to him.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eilen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 06:08 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Democrats you say? Well, maybe DINO democrats.
Edited on Thu Mar-17-11 06:08 AM by eilen
Blue dogs. If you agree with all the positions that Barack Obama has actually taken and acted on, one may not technically be a Democrat or at least a traditional Democrat. You may really be a "New (TM) (& Improved?) Democrat." Seeing how the Republican party has been pushed along the ignorant John Bircher/Tea Party Trail, one could say the same about Republicans. After all, Republicans used to want to govern, now all they care to be are amateur CFOs. All urges for paternalism have manifested in fetal rights defense. Both sides basically gave up the shared goal of a kinder, vibrant civilization.

So much for the shiny city on the hill, we can't afford the electric bill (or maybe it will just glow in the dark after we meltdown-- can't afford those regulators either).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoTimeToulouse Donating Member (204 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #7
23. I'm not so sure that President Obama will enjoy the same

level of turnout that candidate Obama received: which could sink his chances in either a primary or general election.

He would have to overcome the obstacle of himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReggieVeggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:33 AM
Response to Original message
4. no
Democrats seem too spineless to do what needs to be done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. I want the Obama that ran for office,
not the one we seem to have gotten.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
20. Can we get that Obama to run against himself? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. That would indeed be nice
He could run as both Dem and Republican, perhaps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #21
33. LOL good one. :) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoTimeToulouse Donating Member (204 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #5
24. We have the Obama that ran for office. That's the comedy and the tragedy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustABozoOnThisBus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:35 AM
Response to Original message
6. No. He and the Democratic leadership are in lockstep
and marching right.

But, since there's no viable left/liberal party, I'll vote Democratic. Without enthusiasm.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 06:19 AM
Response to Original message
9. My crystal ball sucks
Hard to tell what will happen when Americans are the badly cornered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Township75 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 06:19 AM
Response to Original message
10. I don't expect a serious challenge, and maybe none if his opponent is
a Palin or some other lunatic.

People talk a big game here on DU, but regardless of all the bitching, come election time, they will be talking about how great the Dem nominee is, how evil the Repub nominee is, and how hopeful and wonderful the future will be if we win. Happens every election cycle, whether it is presidential or not. And the same things happens in terms of enthusiasim.

That is why I could care less if people post Obama-bashing pieces on DU. Hell, I even chime in on them. Because in the end, when it matters, we are all there to vote for him, regardless of our idealistic thinking and posting right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. You're half right....
We will all vote for him because we have no choice and the alternative would be slightly worse.

However I think only the truly delusion and foolish (of those who want to simply and blindly cheerlead anyone in power with a D after their name) will be talking about how great the Dem nominee is and how hopeful and wonderful the future will be if we win.

The most any of us will realistically be able to say is that voting for Obama will hold back a full on collapse for at least a couple of years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Township75 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 06:39 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. I think you are actually agreeing with my post.
I'm not saying there aren't delusion people here. Most people in politics are delusional. Face it, you have to be in order to peg one party as absolute evil and one party as pure good in politics when there is so much overlap between the two. Mark my words, the number of anti Obama posts will be nearly zero (there will still be trolls) in October and NOv of the election year.

And most people want to believe they are voting for someone who is great and wonderful, and not against someone just to avoid a full on collapse, so it becomes easy to parrot good things about the Dem nominee...ALL THE TIME!

I wish it were different. Obama doesn't need to be a perfect left wing president for me to vote for him. No one does. In life, there is give and take, as in my personal decisions. For some reason, people expected perfection from a politician in his job, though they likely don't offer perfection in their own jobs, and get disappointed. That is why come next election cycle I can say Obama let me down on some issues, but not others, and I think he has the best chance of beating a repub, therefore he is better than any other primary challenger (barring huge changes between now and then).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoTimeToulouse Donating Member (204 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #17
28. The number of anti Obama posts will be nearly zero.

I'm sure that you are on to something there. Possibly the number of anti Obama posters will be zero as well.



Obama doesn't need to be a perfect left wing president for me either. He just needs to act more like candidate Obama: like a Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoTimeToulouse Donating Member (204 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #12
27. You have to take into account the Dem voters that have been turned off

enough to not vote in the general. These people either don't care or have never heard of democratic underground or would give two hoots to any rebuke that could ever come out of its chat groups.

Reality isn't Democratic underground or the hype from its pep squads.

Reality is unemployment, unemployment, unemployment, unpaid bills, high food and energy costs, unemployment and a Washington that the public sees as being corrupt, uncaring and out of touch.

Don't be surprised if people decide to stay home on election day. They're fed up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
11. Not gonna happen
He'll coast to his renomination, it's probably better than he saves his energy and money for the general, where he's going to need it, especially if unemployment is high, and the Repukes have Romney as their nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 06:29 AM
Response to Original message
14. K&R- I don't but I'd like to see one...Too many mainstream Dems and
the DC crowd supports him for a challenge to be effective.

mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 06:30 AM
Response to Original message
15. The Party would never let that happen.
So much for Democracy, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoTimeToulouse Donating Member (204 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #15
31. I'm reminded of a DU saying during the Bush years.

The fix is in... or something to that level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NHDemProg Donating Member (73 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 06:41 AM
Response to Original message
18. The Teabaggers might want one
if only to distract their fellow idiots from the fact they're as inept as anyone out there...look, shiny!! Shiny!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrTriumph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
19. W made Obama possible. Obama makes Palin, Huckabee, etc. an ugly possibility.
If we do not replace Pres. Obama at the top of our ticket, we will surely lose to whoever the R's run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
22. No, but I would certainly welcome it as
a small bright ray of hope in a dismal world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
25. Your message gets deleted if you think so
So I am not going to say President Obama needs a primary challenger because you message will get deleted by the moderators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
26. Want one. Don't expect one.
Not a viable one, at least. Not a chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
29. No. The sources of money that buy politicians will see to it there there is only 2 people
to pick from. And by "pick," I mean for them to pick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kctim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
30. Not one that would have a chance in hell
Sanders, Kuch, Grayson and other far-left guys would get about 20% and President Obama would get 80%. Not worth the time or effort to challenge him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
34. I HOPE for a Primary challenger.
Somebody needs to use the National Stage for a traditional Working Class "Democratic Party" message.


"There are forces within the Democratic Party who want us to sound like kinder, gentler Republicans.
I want us to compete for that great mass of voters that want a party that will stand up for working Americans."
---Paul Wellstone




"By their WORKS you will know them,"
and "By Their WORKS they will be counted.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
35. No, but I won't have a Democrat to vote for without one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
36. no. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC