Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Help for mortgages, would a sliding scale mortgage elimination work?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
BoWanZi Donating Member (502 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 07:29 PM
Original message
Help for mortgages, would a sliding scale mortgage elimination work?
Just wondering out loud.

The more your house is worth, the less percentage help you would get.

Basically the govt could literally wipe out say 40 percent of the mortgage (absorbing the debt somehow) for homes worth say 90k and less and as the value goes up, the percentage goes down say until it hits 500k or 1million or whatever and then drops to zero.

To me it would be instant help that a lot of people really could use. Their mortgage payments would go from say 900 dollars a month to 500 and so on. And maybe put in a clause that the borrower could not take out a second mortgage/line of credit for at least 5 years after the help is given and so on.

I just am sick of help given to the big fish and would love to see a way of helping the small fish for once.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not since banks won't participate. They like it the way it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BoWanZi Donating Member (502 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. LOL of course the banks won't like it.. but in theory, I really wonder if it woud work.
I don't know if it would be possible to force the banks to help the customers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taught_me_patience Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is a bad idea on many levels
Please don't take any offense:

1) You are not indexing for the cost of homes in certain locales. In certain places, like Los Angeles, many people would receive no help, while almost every home in Iowa would qualify

2) The expense would be stupendous. If there are 10MM homes with an average of 30k in benefit, the program would cost $300B

3) Many people have paid off their home... they would be pissed

4) The problem is that a vast majority of underwater homeowners are able to still fulfill their mortgage obligation. The government have to pay the cost to help these people, but would have no benefit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC