Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Return of the Salmonella Republicans - Remember the salmonella-infected tomatoes of 2008?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 06:55 PM
Original message
Return of the Salmonella Republicans - Remember the salmonella-infected tomatoes of 2008?
Return of the Salmonella Republicans
Jonathan Cohn
March 14, 2011

http://www.tnr.com/blog/jonathan-cohn/85186/salmonella-fda-budget-cut-republican

Remember the salmonella-infected tomatoes of 2008? How about the tainted peanut butter of 2007? Or the bad spinach of 2006? These outbreaks sickened thousands and cost the produce industry hundreds of millions. Yet somehow the Republican Party has forgotten about them.

How else to explain their posture on funding for the Food and Drug Administration? As part of their campaign to reduce federal spending, House Republicans want to reduce FDA food safety funding by $241 million for the duration of this fiscal year. As my friend and former colleague Suzy Khimm recently reported for Mother Jones, that would mean, among other things, furloughing inspectors and reducing examinations of imported food.

And that could be just the beginning of cutbacks at FDA. For next year’s budget, the Republicans have said they want to reduce discretionary spending to 2008 levels. According to calculations by David Plunkett, who is a staff attorney at the Center for Science in the Public Interest, such a cut at FDA would likely force the agency to lay off 600 inspectors, actually reducing the force to slightly less than what it was in 2008. (I can’t vouch for those figures personally, but he extrapolated the figures based on official FDA budget justifications--and his method seems sensible.)
What makes this particularly troubling is that 2008 spending levels were clearly inadequate--even in 2008.

(more at link)
http://www.tnr.com/blog/jonathan-cohn/85186/salmonella-fda-budget-cut-republican

..........

Of all the cuts the Repub's are proposing this is ONE of the worst things they could do! Damn them!
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. God damn the 'Murkins who voted for these fucks
They are getting the government they deserve.

But WE all have to suffer with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. They can take the FDA down if they want to.
Half the salmonella outbreaks in this country would not occur if people just showed common sense and the notion that things like chicken should not be in the fridge shelf above the lettuce. And washed their hands before they started cooking.

The larger industries that the FDA supposed oversees are allowed to pay off the FDA inspectors. While the smaller firms have gestapo-like raids on their businesses. Even if nothing they have done is wrong.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newest Reality Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Imagine the cumulative results
of all this ridiculous, teabaggy, rethuglican legislation and noxious memes. Not that we aren't already living in much of the results of a long takeover.

It would be a rather horrible, sci-fi dystopia, entitled: Life After Republicans. The movie, Brazil got close and, of course 1984 was very prophetic, but this flick would extrapolate on everything we are seeing now. In my vision, it looks exactly like hell on Earth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. You know when I'm in the International aisle or I see "Made in Canada" on the package, I actually
feel more comfortable buying those products now than our own.
What does that say about the state of food safety in this country were people don't have confidence in the food?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC