Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Difference Between Liberal and Progressive.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 06:54 AM
Original message
The Difference Between Liberal and Progressive.
The Difference Between Liberal and Progressive
01/05/2008 - 7:28pm
From an article by Krugman:

OK, before I get there, a word about terms—specifically, liberal vs. progressive. Everyone seems to have their own definitions; mine involves the distinction between values and action. If you think every American should be guaranteed health insurance, you're a liberal; if you're trying to make universal health care happen, you're a progressive.

This is similar to my own personal definition* of Liberal: people who want things like universal healthcare, out of Iraq, privacy rights, help for the homeless, good public schools, justice, equality, etc... but accept the excuses made by politicians and the media for why these things are not possible. See the Process Dodge for more on this.

Progressives, on the other hand, know that progressive policy is possible (and necessary, real soon) and want to fight whatever stands in the way of making it happen.

<more>

http://www.correntewire.com/the_difference_between_liberal_and_progressive

An older article that was probably on DU at the time but I think it's worth a re-post. Personally, I think it's an excellent assessment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. since we're defining things
my definition of liberal is an unusual form of cake, commonly eaten in the north of England, made from willow bark batter and traditionally topped with a small piece of coal.

my definition of progressive is a trapezoidal quadrilateral in which a single side is colored mauve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnroshan Donating Member (333 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 07:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. LOL... Good point.
Redefining language is dangerous territory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 07:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I'm getting the distinct feeling you're
trying to tell me something. . . :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. nah, I'm just a Teaser
I really have almost no opinions anymore.

They just take up space.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. You have to look at it in time and space and perspective ...
Today progressive and liberal are interchangeable.. probably always were.. but I will always self identify as a liberal.

When the whole progressive thing came about, the right was on an all out war to demonize liberals by first attacking the name and assigning values to it.

So people ran from the word liberal and started calling themselves progressives. Same thing, but trying to get away from the right's demonizing.

That never works.. So for me it is probably an age thing,... Young progressives who self identify that way, does not mean they are running away from the liberal mantle.. just not part of their history.

Same as my great grandmother who was always a suffragette.. because she fought the battle.. not a battle I fought, never had to self identify that way..


My take on it

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. The term 'progressive' far pre dates the time you suggest...
You are incorrect that this is when Progressive became a term of political identity. Also that the term exists as a reaction to Republican crapola. Just not factual. At all. In fact the Progressive Era in US Politics is 1890-the 1920's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. My time, my space perspective...
Edited on Wed Mar-23-11 10:26 AM by Peacetrain
You miss the point... edit to add

If you want to go historical the word liberal goes back to "The Enlightenment"

In the 60's, 70's. 80's we self identified as liberals.. until with the help of brother Rush Limbaugh and his ilk in the church of the hatred of the left.. had an all out attack on "bleeding heart liberals" people just did not want to fight a "word" war.. started calling themselves progressives.

Did not change who they were.. It was an attempt to get back on message.

Historically I am a liberal.. will take it to the grave.

Does not mean that a self identified progressive and I have different views.. we have different historical perspective. capish
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLPanhandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
6. There are thousands of issues and topics out there.
Individuals will have varying opinions on each and every one of them.

Sometimes an individual will have a "progressive" viewpoint on one topic, a "conservative" viewpoint on another, a "liberal" viewpoint on another.

I can't see anyone who thinks about each issue ever wanting to be labeled because the label will not always fit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
7. People will try to define their way to a position.
Edited on Wed Mar-23-11 09:49 AM by robcon
Liberal is a word that has gotten out of favor with the electorate; progressive is far more acceptable.

The positions held are identical, and the people involved are the same, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 04:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC