Still the lies. US News agencies lie about "violence" in London

• An estimated 250,000 people joined the TUC anti-cuts march through central London
• The police arrested a total of 9 people, the clashes between police and "activists" had nothing to do with the main demonstration.
• More than a dozen stores on Oxford Street were occupied by UKUncut, as part of a separate but linked demonstration against the cuts, they have nothing to do with the TUC. They targeted Fortnum & Mason who have dodged tens of millions in tax.

The Metropolitan Police press office stated that today's march has been largely peaceful and well ordered, with a small number of violent disruptions and just nine arrests

The Guardian reported


http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/blog/2011/mar/26/march-for-the-alternative-live-updates

Nine arrests, when hundreds of thousands are demonstrating.

So why are American news agencies telling lies about London?

or UKuncut.

Even the Police are saying that.

I know that. You know that. People glancing at the US news headlines probably don't. I was answering your question, "So why are American news agencies telling lies about London?"

Okay, discredit is too nice a term. They LIE about them.

I watched BBC and they said the police stopped counting because the crowd was so huge but estimates said over 500,000.

Fuck M$Greedia - they always sie.

it was ALL about the group that broke off of the main demonstrators and caused the violence. if that was the only report you saw, you would have thought they were all violent.

before the anarchists kicked off in the evening.

when/if these protests spread.