Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Medical bankruptcies INCREASE in MA after health care "reform"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 05:51 AM
Original message
Medical bankruptcies INCREASE in MA after health care "reform"
http://www.kentucky.com/2011/03/27/1686304/we-need-single-payer-nonprofit.html

Now comes a Harvard research study showing that despite the increase in the number of people covered, the Massachusetts reform hasn't made a significant dent in the medical bankruptcy rate. Families still are being ruined by unpayable medical bills.

The researchers discovered that between early 2007 and mid-2009 — before and after the reform took effect — the share of medical bankruptcies in Massachusetts changed very little, from 59.3 percent to 52.9 percent. The absolute number of medical bankruptcies actually climbed from 7,504 to 10,093.

Lest you think only low-income families are being financially clobbered by medical debt, think again. Two-thirds of the bankruptcy filers were college-educated and 89 percent had health insurance when they filed their court papers.

In explanation, the authors of the study, which appears in the American Journal of Medicine, write: "Health costs in the state have risen sharply since reform was enacted. Even before the changes in health care laws, most medical bankruptcies in Massachusetts — as in other states — afflicted middle-class families with health insurance. High premium costs and gaps in coverage — co-payments, deductibles and uncovered services — often left insured families liable for substantial out-of-pocket costs. None of that changed."

Lead author Dr. David Himmelstein elaborates: "Massachusetts' health reform, like the national law modeled after it, takes many of the uninsured and makes them under-insured, typically giving them a skimpy, defective private policy that's like an umbrella that melts in the rain: The protection's not there when you need it."


Needless to say, these findings don't bode well for the look-alike federal law's ability to end the scandalous blight of medical bankruptcies in the U.S. And behind these statistics are tragic, heart-rending stories.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 05:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. A REAL NATIONAL SINGLE PAYER PLAN is the only rational solution.
All attempts that "save" the health insurance industry profits are doomed to (very very very) expensive failure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 05:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree - health care - not health insurance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RegieRocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Instance companies control health care costs now. A national
mandatory health insurance would be able to completely control costs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 06:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Agreed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 07:04 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Agreed. Now go elect the Senate that will pass it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 05:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. what a friend we have in Romneycare...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 06:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. But hey everybody's covered, so what's the problem?
It's token coverage, that's the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
8. That skimpy defective policy is designed for one thing insurance company profit.
Rommenycare keeping corporative profits high by sucking in those unsuspecting customers. Its like having a new car with a $10000 dollar deductible for collision & comprehensive coverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC