Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US Nuclear Plants Fail to Report Safety Defects

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 08:55 AM
Original message
US Nuclear Plants Fail to Report Safety Defects
Edited on Tue Mar-29-11 08:56 AM by kpete
Source: Wall Street Journal

Nuclear Plants Fail to Report Safety Defects
Industry Confusion Over Rules Could Keep Regulators From Spotting Troubling Trends at Facilities, Federal Study Finds


By TENNILLE TRACY

Nearly 30% of U.S. nuclear-power plants fail to report equipment defects that could pose substantial safety risks, a flaw in federal oversight that could make it harder for regulators to spot troublesome trends across the industry, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's inspector general said Thursday.

The Office of Inspector General said nuclear-plant operators were confused about what they were required to report to regulators about manufacturing defects. One section of federal law, known as Part 21, requires them to report defective equipment that could cause a safety risk, while another section calls for them to report only defects that compromise safety.

In what's been seen as a small victory for the American anti-nuclear lobby -- just ten days after the Fukushima nuclear disaster, a federal judge has decided to focus on the operating license of America's most dilapidated reactor: Oyster Creek on the east coast. Courtesy AFP.

If the issue isn't resolved, "the margin of safety for operating reactors could be reduced," the inspector general said. That's because many nuclear plants use similar hardware, and a failure to report defects at one plant could mean that others aren't alerted to a potential problem, the report said.




Read more: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704604704576220580502428622.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. Not tryin' to hijack your thread here, but one has to wonder what this situation would be like if
unions, along with their commitment to professionalism, were more fully involved in ALL aspects of the development & implementation of nuclear energy from day one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC