Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Boeing ‘Concerned’ as 737s’ Cracks Occur Earlier Than Expected

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 10:14 PM
Original message
Boeing ‘Concerned’ as 737s’ Cracks Occur Earlier Than Expected

(Bloomberg) Boeing Co. (BA) said metal-fatigue inspections must be stepped up on older 737s, the world’s most widely flown jet, after cracks developed earlier than expected on a Southwest Airlines Co. (LUV) plane that split open last week.

Cracks on the so-called 737 Classic weren’t forecast to occur until “much later,” after 60,000 cycles of takeoffs and landings, said Paul Richter, Boeing’s chief project engineer for older jets. The plane that ripped in an April 1 flight above Arizona had flown 39,781 cycles.

“We are all concerned about this recent development,” Richter said yesterday on a conference call. He said Boeing is working with airlines worldwide to ensure that those making frequent, shorter flights, like Southwest, inspect the jets within five days.

About 175 planes flown by carriers in the U.S., Asia and Europe meet the criteria of a U.S. Federal Aviation Administration directive issued yesterday requiring inspections for cracks on all 737-300s, 737-400s and 737-500s that have flown more than 30,000 cycles. The FAA also is taking the rare step of requiring checks again every 500 cycles as a precaution while the probe continues, Richter said. .............(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-04-06/boeing-concerned-as-737s-cracks-occur-earlier-than-expected.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. age of planes? hours on fuselage?
I haven't searched but haven't heard either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It was a 737-300, which means its was mid-80s to mid-90s vintage.
Edited on Tue Apr-05-11 10:21 PM by marmar
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Faster than expected?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. That is what caught my eye also. They expected this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kokonoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. Maybe they just rolled back the cycles.
It seems anything that saves money, is on the table nowadays.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC