Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

You Come for Our Unions We Come for Your Corporate Mega Churches

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
upstatecajun Donating Member (511 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 07:00 PM
Original message
You Come for Our Unions We Come for Your Corporate Mega Churches
AFL-CIO President Richard Trumpka gave a rousing speech this week about the need for a mobile, global labor movement to counter-act the attacks on workers around the globe. He pointed out that in a declining economy, politics become vicious and the viscous attack. And most importantly, he noted that the CEO backed Republicans attacked unions and collective bargaining because the unions are weak right now. The Republicans thought it would be an easy kill.

They were wrong.

But instead of just fighting to hang on, we need to fight for the rights of all workers, we need to fight to grow union labor and grow workers rights if we are to save the middle class. We need to grow an army of people dedicated to workers rights who can and will protest peacefully and memorably as they did in Madison at the drop of a hat. We need to take the Madison spirit, the Egyptian spirit, and the Tunisian spirit – and plant it, feed it, nurture it.


Instead of being on the defense, we need to be on the offense. Republicans present the notion that unions are to blame for the budget crisis while urging the parishioners of huge tax exempt mega churches to vote Republican. Mega churches have become political action committees for all intents and purposes, and as such, are on par with how Republicans see unions. If taking away collective bargaining rights is necessary under the guise of a fiscal emergency, what other rights are up for grabs? Perhaps the next right to be targeted should be a Republican PAC such as mega churches



http://www.politicususa.com/en/you-come-for-our-unions-we-come-for-your-corporate-mega-churches
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bingo! Sorry but these Mega Churches don't get to dip their
toes in the Public Politics and then claim that they can still be tax exempt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I like that idea a lot!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
urgk Donating Member (982 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. That image has a baptismal quality. (n/p)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
36. There is no reason for mego-churches to be tax exempt anywayz. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Cut their Faith based dollars off!
I'm tired of seeing my tax dollars go to these pulpit pimp welfare queens who fleece their flocks so they can buy another Rolls Royce and another mansion in Palm Springs.

TAKE THESE PULPIT PIMPS OFF OF WELFARE. TAX THEM! MAKE 'EM PAY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #37
58. I agree. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasquuatch55 Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
52. Absolutely! nt
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LARED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's kinda weird that the church shown in the article is a
Edited on Sat Apr-30-11 07:52 PM by LARED
30 member church, not a mega church.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Of course, there are thousands such churches which, despite their
professed independence, are networked into a far-right Christian structure. Which has more power? A single church with membership of 9000, or 900 churches in 900 communities working in tandem, each with 100 members? THAT is the real mega-church.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Dogs hear the whistles and ChurchCo KNOWS how to whistle. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. Unions were created to help with upward mobility. So were corporations. It is the corporations
Edited on Sat Apr-30-11 10:41 PM by applegrove
that should be pointed out as the equivalent thing to unions. Both allow a group of people to get together and approach a market because pure capitalism didn't create the conditions for upward mobility needed for the human race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. No, the major point of a corporation is to limit personal liability..
Edited on Sun May-01-11 09:09 AM by Fumesucker
Which they are absolutely fantastic at doing.

ETA: To a big extent unions are "bottom up" organizations in which the rank and file at least theoretically is in charge, the exact opposite is true of corporations which are "top down" organizations in the great majority of cases.

Unions are democratic, at least in theory, corporations are anything but.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
34. Unions are democratic, corporations and mega churches are authoritarian. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
45. "upward mobility" is a marketing term which means nothing
alas, that was a creative approach to establish a false analogy between two very different things like unions and corporations.

Only in America... good grief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
53. Really curious where you got your information.
Not a single word of what you've written remotely coincides with anything I've read, seen or heard in an economics or history class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #53
57. It just popped into my head last week. Why, am I not telling the truth here? Don't both unions and
corporations help with upward mobility for workers and people with savings? Don't they both allow groups of people to approach a market? And incidentally, nobody tells corporations they are not allowed to take all the efficiencies of being corporation away when they do business with government so why does anyone have a right to take that collective barganing rights away from unions when they do business with government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 01:58 AM
Response to Original message
7. K&R. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 03:19 AM
Response to Original message
8. K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
9. Plenty of union members go to churches
And plenty of churches are on the right side here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
11. Excellent
Happy Labor Day everyone

Solidarity Forever!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Firebrand Gary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
12. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowwood Donating Member (550 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
13. Just the Church Itself
I am quite willing to let the churches go untaxed.

i just don't see why we should let their parsonages, radio stations, TV stations, other buildings go untaxed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mrs. Ted Nancy Donating Member (303 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
15. The "viscous" attack?
He pointed out that in a declining economy, politics become vicious and the viscous attack.


Does this mean that the thick-headed attack? If so, I agree. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
16. HUGE K & R !!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
17. The tax exempt status of churches
needs to end regardless of the the GOP's treatment of unions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
18. I came to the conclusion last night
(thinking about things again)that the churches are behind less taxes because they are pissed that their members give to the state and then have little to give to them. I know that many churches have members tithe at least 10% - 30% of their income, add to that another 15% - 30% taxes and it doesn't leave much to live on.

They should be advocating for their members by pushing to tax corps and the rich more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sulphurdunn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. Sound Reasoning.
I hadn't thought of it. It makes perfect sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #18
46. Funny how their almighty god is all powerful, all knowing, he is the creator of everything
the master of time and space... except for money. Funny how these gods always need money, isn't it?

So much for them being omnipotent, omnipresent, and stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mountainlion55 Donating Member (302 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
19. Plain an simple
Religion should have no part in governing! The separation of church and state is the most important part of our constitution after freedom of speech! IMO-- churches tax exempt status should be revoked. :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maineman Donating Member (411 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
20. Very interesting arena. More to be said here...
Church goers are highly vulnerable to Republican/Corporate operatives who are experts at implanting cliches in people brains, articles of faith, like government is too big, government is the problem, unions are the problem, Democrats are soft on defense, Democrats are tax and spend oriented, Republicans are better with the economy (Ha!), privatization is better, etc.

Church goers elected George W Bush, and I suspect several of them feel they were conned, which they were.

Religious conservatives need accurate information, but unfortunately, they often cannot accept it when it verifies that they are misinformed. They do indeed act like very much like a PAC in support of Republicans who play to them with various social agenda items. The only strategy I can think of is to hammer them (repeatedly) with simple true statements that hit home on subjects like cutting Medicare in order to give tax cuts to the wealthy and to corporations. They are accustomed to hearing highly emotional admonitions, so there needs to be some emotion involved. Simple, convincing facts might work if repeated often enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlancheSplanchnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
21. Richard Trumka, You are Brilliant!
Oh please, get this started. We--The People-- NEED an organizing, unifying force!

and maybe unifying under the banner of WORKERS' Rights is the one that can bring together the various divergent groups within the Progressive/Democratic demographic towards clear goals, benefitting us all! Women, Ethnic groups, GLBT. That would be GOOD!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moostache Donating Member (905 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
22. "Lighthouses are more helpful than churches." [Benjamin Franklin] (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #22
64. I would double check that quote, Franklin belonged to at least Five Churches
Ben Franklin belonged to at least Five Churches while living in Philadelphia (and gave money to all of them), his funnel was overseen by all of them and more (The Local Catholics even provided a Priest). Franklin thought churches did a lot of good, mostly at the local level. Thus this statement is out of Character of Franklin. Franklin tended to be more careful when it came to such sayings.

Now, I can NOT exclude such a comment from being made by Franklin, but I have read his auto-biography and one of his comment was it was better to attribute a saying to a famous person long dead then to say you came up with it yourself (And this was especially true of sayings you did come up with). Thus a lot of "Sayings" attributed to Franklin, Washington, Jefferson, Lincoln and others, were NEVER said by them Many of these pseudo-sayings are all over the net (This is also true of various sayings attributed to Hitler, Stalin and Mao). This was the same reason the Early Christian Church decided to use the Four Gospels as its foundation, if a saying of Christ is NOT in one of those four books, the Christian position is it is a questionable attribution to Christ. Some citation is needed, and hopefully not to some collection of sayings of Franklin on the net that also does NOT provide an attribution of the saying.

Just a comment, that this attribution may have been made by Franklin, but also it may NOT have been made by Franklin. Some research is needed and I just do not have the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
23. "Mega churches have become political action committees
for all intents and purposes, and as such, are on par with how Republicans see unions."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
24. No church should be tax exempt.
Edited on Sun May-01-11 10:56 AM by sarcasmo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Citizen Worker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
25. Brother Trumpka, this is a misguided strategy at best. Tens of thousands of Union members attend
these churches and to attack these institutions is to attack our own members. The war is with corporations and the political duopoly that serves as corporate hand maiden, not churches. Even if Labor were successful in dismantling the evangelical churches the two party duopoly and their corporate masters are still in control and all that will be achieved is tens of thousands of pissed off Union members. Tearing down a working class institution in order to try and save another is not the answer to Labor's revitalization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
October Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. Maybe, but...if i'm a union worker under attack
If I'm a union worker under attack -- and the (tax-exempt) church I attend is telling me to vote for repukes who attack my union... my loyalty will be all about putting food on the table for my family.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sulphurdunn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. I see what you're saying,
but I'd hope there aren't too many union members or labor supporters in general who'd attend churches that attacked labor rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #25
47. Without the evangelicals the GOP would have been irrelevant for over 3 decades
Edited on Sun May-01-11 03:34 PM by liberation
Plus there is a biiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiig difference between a corporate megachurch and your local community church.

BTW, do you have actual numbers to back up your assertion regarding the union membership among mega church attendees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #25
59. See my post below, Trumpka NEVER mentions Churches, if fact ends his speech with "and God Bless you"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
27. Yes, tax those mega-churches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TransitJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
28. K & R
I'm amazed that this finally got said out loud.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
30. +111111111111111111111
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
31.  Churches ARE government
Religious organizations' purpose is to raise money.... and then use it to have power over people.

How is that different from a government?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #31
63. Yep..an arm of the government. not much has changed since the dark ages in that respect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joanbarnes Donating Member (204 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
33. I always say, tax them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
35. I cant see any rationale for not taxing mega-churches. Anyone? Anyone? nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
They_Live Donating Member (244 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
38. Excellent Idea!
and long overdue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
39. We could balance the budget alone just by taxing mega-churches and mega-profits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just-plain-Kathy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
40. Churches should pay taxes on their profits...so should Indian casinos.
k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raksha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
41. I'm all for it! Not only should the megachurches have to register as PACs
and be taxed accordingly, but the various allegedly "independent" churches of the New Apostolic Reformation (NAR) should also be treated as PACs. The following Talk To Action article isn't new, but it's one of the most comprehensive I've seen yet about the political agenda and "political theology" of the religious right: Biblical Capitalism - The Sacralizing of Political and Economic Issues

The only thing I'd be concerned about is that the theocrats might retaliate by demanding that the progressive religious organizations I support, such as Rabbi Michael Lerner's Network of Spiritual Progressives and Rabbi Arthur Waskow's Shalom Center, also register as PACs and be taxed accordingly. After all--they do have a political agenda, which in their case is based upon the Jewish tradition of social justice.

There is this basic distinction, though: Progressive religious organizations almost without exception SUPPORT the public sphere and the separation of church and state. They are not seeking government funding for Jewish day schools or other private schools at the expense of public education. Above all, they don't have a "sacred" economic system they are pushing--not capitalism and not socialism either. Their sole concern is with economic justice.

There is a big difference between having spiritual VALUES that influence and inspire your vote and your political activism, and having a specific theocratic political AGENDA. I'm not sure how you would write that distinction into law, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
42. The purpose of churches is enrich the wealthy at the expense of the masses.
Edited on Sun May-01-11 02:16 PM by valerief
That's their raison d'etre.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
43. Pick a spelling-"viscous", "vicious"...
Edited on Sun May-01-11 02:45 PM by louis-t
I think they're both wrong.
Signed, the spelling police.

Oops, I spelled the misspelling wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerncrone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
44. AMEN! Brother Trumpka!!
Tell it! :woohoo:
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
48. Trumpka NEVER mention Mega-Churches, that is the position of the Author of the Article
Edited on Sun May-01-11 04:19 PM by happyslug
Read it carefully, the author starts with Trumpka's speech, then goes on her own tangent with the push against the mega-Churches.

Here is the COMPLETE Speech of April 27, 2011:
Good afternoon. It is such a pleasure to be here with all of you. I want to extend a special greeting to all the young lawyers here today. I look at you and I see myself back in 1978 as a new attorney at the Mineworkers. Thank you for choosing to be a labor lawyer, to spend your career fighting for workers—and for being part of the giant LCC law firm that the AFL-CIO is so fortunate to have as its partner.

Let me also express my heartfelt thanks to Lynn Rhinehart, our General Counsel and the leader of the Lawyers Coordinating Committee, for all she has done over the last year and a half since becoming General Counsel. The officers of the AFL-CIO rely on her and her colleagues' guidance every day, and we are grateful.

I want to speak to you today about the state of the labor movement and the state of our nation. This is an extraordinary moment, when your skills your dedication to working people are needed more than ever. In fact, many of you are probably overwhelmed by the needs of your clients and found it challenging even to make the time to be here. Other LCC colleagues—in Ohio, Texas, Wisconsin, Indiana, Florida and other key states—simply couldn't get here because their legislatures are still in session and they needed to stay home to help stop any last-minute legislative attacks.

So here is how things seem to me. Our nation's economy is weak. The real unemployment rate is around 16%. Housing prices are falling and gas prices are rising—a deadly combination. Thanks to stimulus spending, the economy has gotten a little better, but not much. We face fundamental problems whose roots are wage stagnation and inequality—both tied to the weakness of the labor movement and to globalization that has no plan for maintaining the middle class. On top of that, we have failed as a nation to invest in our future—in our workforce, in our infrastructure, in technology, in the clean energy the rest of the world is moving towards—and we haven't done that because the wealthiest among us would rather have tax cuts than a future.

Since this debate is raging right now, I want to state the obvious—that the dumbest possible thing to do in a weak economy is cut government budgets, lay off hundreds of thousands of government employees and suffer through the inevitable shrinking of the economy. Yet that is exactly what we are doing. And the reason we are doing it is politics.

In a weak economy—a shrinking pie—politics gets vicious. The people who have always been vicious get more followers, and the voices of reason are drowned out. It is a time ripe for the Glenn Becks, the Scott Walkers and the culture police in Maine who think workers will be silenced by destroying our art.

It is telling that their Number One target is not President Obama, although they hate him. Their Number One target is us—working people and our unions. Why? Because working people's strength and passion for our rights, for our families and our country, our solidarity and our unions are a wall standing between the Scott Walkers and the Glenn Becks and the Koch Brothers and all the power they crave but will never, ever get in our country. Not in America.

That's what working people—and LCC members standing with them—showed in Indianapolis and Madison and Columbus, Ohio—in the streets and the statehouses and the polling booths all across our country.

You know, the right wing cabal that dreamed up the attack on public employees really thought—since they had lots more money than we did, and they had bought politicians legally with campaign contributions—that this was going to be easy. But they misunderstood who they were taking on. It wasn't anyone famous. They were taking on the people who teach our children and care for us when we grow old, the men and women who rescue us when we are in trouble, the people who clean up the parks in summer and plow the roads in the winter—the men and women who serve our country every day—and their families, their friends and every person in our country who they help.

The fact is that what brings us together—teachers and students, construction workers and health care workers, police and firefighters—is stronger than what divides us. Let me tell you that one of the best moments in this fight so far was the moment when the sheriff of Madison, Wisconsin called a press conference to say he and his deputies refused to be Scott Walker's, and I quote, "palace guard," and refused to throw the people of Wisconsin out of their state house. The solidarity of working people is a powerful thing.

Money may not win in the end, but it can certainly put up a fight. We have our work cut out for us across these states. In Wisconsin, the recall battles are on, and the state senators who voted to take away workers' rights are running scared. And in Ohio, although they passed the bill to take away our rights, the citizens' veto is underway. The fact is that today, four months into this fight, we have managed to fend off or delay almost all of the attacks on public employee collective bargaining rights, and dozens---hundreds---of other attacks.

And for that, we have to thank the courage and tenacity of working people, the ingenuity of lawyers and the integrity of judges. Because, in Madison, Wisconsin, Scott Walker and his friends in the legislature simply were not willing to hold an open vote on their anti-worker bill. They were afraid to look the teachers and health care workers in the eye and take away their rights in an open meeting. They figured that the law is meant for little people, not people of importance like themselves, and they took the vote in secret. And now, Scott Walker's bill is enjoined until he and his friends summon the courage and the support to vote it in an open meeting.

I really believe the public is on to what these CEO-backed Republican attackers are trying to do to working people and their rights, and that over the next 18 months, working people and our allies across these battleground states are going to win—not every fight, but the big ones and the day. I believe Scott Walker, the ambitious little big man that he is, will regret listening to the Koch Brothers—the real ones, not the Internet pranksters.

But the bigger question really is what does this fight mean for workers' future in America? It would be nice to say that victory over Kasich and Walker and company will mean victory for workers and our unions. But that will not be true.

The reality is that we have only faced this kind of attack because the labor movement has been in decline for so long our enemies thought we were weak and isolated and could be destroyed once and for all. The truth is that we live in a country where 3 out of 4 workers are in the private sector, and only 7% of them have a union in their workplace. That figure—7% private-sector union density—may be the most important number in American life. It speaks to stagnant wages and out-of‑ control health care costs, to mass foreclosures, to weak demand, to the politics of plutocracy, to our failure to invest in America.

It has brought us where we are, and we will not revive as a movement, will not be the voice for all workers that we must be, until far more workers in the private sector enjoy the rights to bargain and to economic security that public-sector workers are fighting for right now across our heartland. We must rededicate ourselves to organizing, and to finding creative new ways for workers to have a voice on the job if we want to be a force that cannot just withstand attacks, but can push and win a progressive agenda that benefits all working people.

I know we all share a deep disappointment over the failure of the Democrats to pass the Employee Free Choice Act in 2009 and 2010. And I want you to know we have not given up working to find and create paths to labor law reform. We will not repeat the mistake we made in the 1970s, when we lost the moment and let it go for a generation---we will not.

But I am increasingly convinced that if we want the law to change, workers must demand that change. We must remember that first there were mass strikes in cities like Seattle and Minneapolis, then the National Labor Relations Act passed. First came the mass arrests in Birmingham, Alabama, then the Civil Rights Act. First came the attack on John Lewis and the voting rights marchers on the Pettus Bridge, then the Voting Rights Act. Power yields nothing without a fight.

So we must organize now. That means experimentation. It means creating not just national corporate strategies, but global strategies. Solidarity must be as mobile as capital. It means expanding and deepening Working America, the AFL-CIO's community affiliate, and figuring out ways to broaden Working America's scope into the workplace. It means strengthening our community partnerships and alliances with worker centers and other organizing efforts among excluded workers. It means community-based campaigns like the car wash organizing effort up the road from here in LA, where the Steelworkers are working with community organizations to organize thousands of low-wage, immigrant workers with the active help of LCC members like Jay Smith and Ryan Spillers and so many others. It means looking at organizing across workplaces in communities where there is energy—in places like Wisconsin and Ohio and Indiana. You're going to be hearing more about this tomorrow from our terrific new organizing director, the former secretary-treasurer of the UAW, Elizabeth Bunn.

Millions of people have learned in these last few months how important the right to collective bargaining is if we want to be a middle-class country, and about the power of nonviolent protest. There should be consequences for taking away the right to bargain—consequences not just for politicians, but for employers, too. Employers in this country should learn that the penalty for firing a worker for organizing a union is something more than a Board charge and a posting. We should be building an army of activists across the country who are ready to protest at the workplaces of employers who deny workers' rights. Without flying squadrons, could organizing the manufacturing sector have been possible? No doubt, you will be the lawyers advising the army of activists and assisting them along the way. You might even have to defend them a time or two.

The AFL-CIO is committed to growing and broadening the labor movement and to lending our voice and our strength to the cause of democracy wherever the fight may be. And I do mean wherever.

As the protests in Wisconsin raged, union members in Washington and around the world were at Egyptian embassies, standing in solidarity with Egyptian workers on strike against the Mubarak kleptocracy. Last week the AFL-CIO filed a protest under the United States' trade agreement with Bahrain against the savage repression of the workers' movement in that country, where immigrant and Bahraini workers have stood together demanding democracy, only to be shot down in the streets by government security forces.

In the age of Internet globalization, we live our cause as one with workers around the world. The U.S. labor movement's voice has been clear in support of democracy and workers' rights in Tunisia, in Egypt, in Bahrain, in Syria, in Iran—and our voice has been heard. Victorious protestors in Egypt ordered pizza by cell phone for workers sitting-in in Madison, Wisconsin. One of the inspiring young leaders of the teaching assistants' AFT local in Madison is an Egyptian student whose family was in the streets in Cairo. We are global.

In that spirit, we are building solidarity with workers around the world employed by the same company. CWA and the German union Ver di have come together to help Deutsche Telekom workers all over the world organize, including T-Mobile workers in this country. The United Auto Workers and its counterparts worldwide in the International Metalworkers Federation are doing the same for U.S. companies globally, and foreign auto companies operating in the U.S. multinational corporations must be met by multinational solidarity.

But if the importance of unity among workers around the world has been highlighted, so has the importance of unity at home. In state after state, the entire labor movement is working together at a level of cooperation we haven't seen in years. The unions of the AFL-CIO, including the hundreds of locals with solidarity charters, and the unions that left the AFL-CIO in 2005 and remain unaffiliated, the National Education Association, the Fraternal Order of Police and other unions that have never been affiliated with the AFL-CIO—we are all working together. This solidarity is what we need to rebuild a strong and effective American labor movement. It cannot be temporary. And we cannot accept an ad hoc, cafeteria-style solidarity. There is no reason today for disunity in our movement. No issues of principle divide us, and we cannot afford division for its own sake. But we are hurt, our movement is hurt, by the absence of disaffiliated unions from our common efforts.

We need—working people need—a labor movement united in the AFL-CIO to bring us all together—not just for the numbers or organizational strength of the unions that have left us. But also, their wealth of ideas, energy and perspective. What is the AFL-CIO if not the embodiment of others' recognition long ago that apart, the AFL and the CIO were not strong enough to make enough of a difference for workers—and both sides had to change to make unity work. We're in that position again today, and I am committed to unity and to reaching out in the coming weeks and months to make it happen.

But frankly, time is short.

Why do I say that? Because we have not arrested our long downward slide. And, because the labor movement faces true existential challenges. Our foes aren't nipping at the edges of workers' rights and unions. They are waging a coordinated effort to take us out. All the way out.

The next stage of the battle, of course, is 2012.

But understand, if the results in 2012 merely extend the status quo of 2011, that is almost as much an existential threat as an electoral defeat in 2012 would be. We need a 2012 election that puts the Scott Walkers of the world on notice that their agenda is not a viable political strategy. We need to win back the House, keep the Senate and win state and local races across the country. We need to win back at least one house in every one of these embattled state legislatures. Political strategies that are simply about low-risk ways of holding the White House will not help workers—they will lengthen a losing end game and will not give us a path to victory.

To get the job done, we need to build and strengthen and broaden the labor movement. We need to better engage our members and build an army of activists like the teachers and firefighters and other public employees in Wisconsin who have inspired us all. We need to have the numbers, the organization and the strength to push our agenda and to hold employers AND politicians—and I mean both Republicans and the Democrats who have been weak friends or worse—we have to hold them all accountable when they fail to stand up for working people.

We must take the spirit that brought working people to the streets of Indianapolis and Madison and Columbus—and Tunis and Cairo—and bring it to all our nation's workplaces—and to our polling places, our state capitols and our national capitol. With this spirit of unity, of solidarity, of democracy itself, we can be unstoppable in 2011, in 2012 and in the years to come.

Because of this spirit, workers' rights and collective bargaining are in the news in a way they haven't been in decades. Young people want to learn about unions. An LCC member who teaches law told us his students now think unions are cool, for the first time since he started teaching.

And let's hear it for the 60 LCC lawyers who volunteered and held dozens of teach-ins at law schools around the April 4 "We Are One" days of solidarity! April 4 showed that the Wisconsin Moment, the Midwest Uprising, was not fleeting. It was not geographically isolated. It caught fire in the working people of America. That fire has grown. And on the days surrounding April 4—the 43rd anniversary of the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., who gave his life for the right to organize—hundreds of thousands of working people from Lincoln, Nebraska to Puerto Rico, from California to Maine, joined together in those We Are One solidarity days.

And it's still growing. And I expect when you leave here you will fan that flame and keep it growing.

This incredible moment was created by the greed and meanness and overreaching of people who want to take away workers' rights and destroy unions. But it has presented us with an incredible opportunity.

The question is, what do we make of this moment? Will it begin a rejuvenated labor movement? Will we build upon it to build our movement? I think there's no question but that we must. And we need your help.

You, the lawyers of the labor movement, have a great part to play in the days to come, just as you have in these last few months of struggle across our heartland. And we know you will meet the challenge—as you did in Florida in 2000, as you did across our country protecting the right to vote in 2004 and 2008, and as you do every day representing working people and their unions. Your leadership, your ideas, your activism, your passion are needed now more than ever before.

Thank you for all you do—and will continue to do—to fight for workers' rights, to build the movement that we love and move this country in a better direction.

Thank you, and God bless you.

http://www.aflcio.org/mediacenter/prsptm/sp04272011.cfm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dont call me Shirley Donating Member (396 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
49. MegaChurches are the domain of the MIC....
How best to push their agenda for their WWIII than to send the message for armageddon right down through the pulpit. And people actually believe this shiz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #49
62. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radhika Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
50. Finally! Someone will hit them where they live - the money belt n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northofdenali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
51. YEEE HAW! What a terrific post, thank you.
Highly R'd & K'd. Solidarity forever!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
54. Going to have to push this to the limit. Too much abuse of the exemptions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
55. Yes! Tax those bastards!
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
56. Can anyone vouch for politicsusa? Ever heard of it? I don't understand why anyone would
be excited to see the death of unions equated with taxing megachurches. If unions go....so should corporations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #56
61. Trumpka NEVER mention Mega-Churches, that is the position of the Author of the Article
In fact, Trumpka ended that speech (Which I included in my thread above) with the phase "Thank you, and God bless you", which implies a support for religion and Churches NOT any opposition to either.

The Entire speech is here:
http://www.aflcio.org/mediacenter/prsptm/sp04272011.cfm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #61
66. I'm glad to hear it. I didn't read what was linked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
60. Yes Please !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #60
65. So you supprt Trumpka call, which includes "God Bless you"
Your statement is so short I must take it to be support for Trumpka's position made in the speech that Trumpka ends with the Phase "Thank you, and God Bless You".

As to mega-Churches, Trumpka does NOT mention them in his speech, and Yes, can NOT be for support of the Article's author's position to tax the Mega-Churches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC