Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jpak

(41,758 posts)
Tue Dec 19, 2017, 05:29 AM Dec 2017

Oldest fossils ever found show life on Earth began before 3.5 billion years ago

https://phys.org/news/2017-12-oldest-fossils-life-earth-began.html

Researchers at UCLA and the University of Wisconsin-Madison have confirmed that microscopic fossils discovered in a nearly 3.5 billion-year-old piece of rock in Western Australia are the oldest fossils ever found and indeed the earliest direct evidence of life on Earth.

The study, published today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, was led by J. William Schopf, professor of paleobiology at UCLA, and John W. Valley, professor of geoscience at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. The research relied on new technology and scientific expertise developed by researchers in the UW-Madison WiscSIMS Laboratory.

The study describes 11 microbial specimens from five separate taxa, linking their morphologies to chemical signatures that are characteristic of life. Some represent now-extinct bacteria and microbes from a domain of life called Archaea, while others are similar to microbial species still found today. The findings also suggest how each may have survived on an oxygen-free planet.

The microfossils—so called because they are not evident to the naked eye—were first described in the journal Science in 1993 by Schopf and his team, which identified them based largely on the fossils' unique, cylindrical and filamentous shapes. Schopf, director of UCLA's Center for the Study of Evolution and the Origin of Life, published further supporting evidence of their biological identities in 2002.

<more>





Read more at: https://phys.org/news/2017-12-oldest-fossils-life-earth-began.html#jCp
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Oldest fossils ever found show life on Earth began before 3.5 billion years ago (Original Post) jpak Dec 2017 OP
Or it began 6000 years ago if you're Sarah Palin More_Cowbell Dec 2017 #1
And 3.5 billion is more than 6000? For those home schooled dembotoz Dec 2017 #6
I for one welcome our 3.5-billion-year-old fossil ancestor overlords Achilleaze Dec 2017 #2
Interestingly life began as soon as it was remotely possible jimlup Dec 2017 #3
The article says Earth had liquid water 4.3 billion years ago muriel_volestrangler Dec 2017 #5
yes but 800 million years for the jimlup Dec 2017 #8
I am glad there are people with enough riversedge Dec 2017 #4
I'm so tired of this science-based claptrap! MineralMan Dec 2017 #7
So cool! Hekate Dec 2017 #9

Achilleaze

(15,543 posts)
2. I for one welcome our 3.5-billion-year-old fossil ancestor overlords
Tue Dec 19, 2017, 06:34 AM
Dec 2017

They've got to have more honesty, integrity and loyalty than the godforsaken KGOP republicans.

jimlup

(7,968 posts)
3. Interestingly life began as soon as it was remotely possible
Tue Dec 19, 2017, 07:05 AM
Dec 2017

before 4.0 billion the Earth was a molten hell hole.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadean

Such an early appearance of life leads me to suspect panspermia - the hypothesis that life arrived here via meteorites. I also suspect that if this hypothesis is correct, the asteroids were martian.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,321 posts)
5. The article says Earth had liquid water 4.3 billion years ago
Tue Dec 19, 2017, 09:54 AM
Dec 2017

so this is 800 million years after that - not really "as soon as possible", though there are claims for indirect signs of life well before this: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-39117523

jimlup

(7,968 posts)
8. yes but 800 million years for the
Tue Dec 19, 2017, 07:53 PM
Dec 2017

beginning of something as complex as even the simplest life seems remarkable to me. I'm an educated scientist though not a biologist. I am unable to believe that life started by random or even selected random chance. I'm not claiming to know that the answer. I'm just saying we don't know and we shouldn't delude ourselves that we do. At least panspermia buys me a few more billion years and much more complexity.

riversedge

(70,242 posts)
4. I am glad there are people with enough
Tue Dec 19, 2017, 07:19 AM
Dec 2017

patience to do this slow, detailed work.


.......In preparation for SIMS analysis, the team needed to painstakingly grind the original sample down as slowly as possible to expose the delicate fossils themselves—all suspended at different levels within the rock and encased in a hard layer of quartz—without actually destroying them. Spicuzza describes making countless trips up and down the stairs in the department as geoscience technician Brian Hess ground and polished each microfossil in the sample, one micrometer at a time.

Each microfossil is about 10 micrometers wide; eight of them could fit along the width of a human hair.


Valley and Schopf are part of the Wisconsin Astrobiology Research Consortium, funded by the NASA Astrobiology Institute, which exists to study and understand the origins, the future and the nature of life on Earth and throughout the universe.

Studies such as this one, Schopf says, indicate life could be common throughout the universe. But importantly, here on Earth, because several different types of microbes were shown to be already present by 3.5 billion years ago, it tells us that "life had to have begun substantially earlier—nobody knows how much earlier—and confirms it is not difficult for primitive life to form and to evolve into more advanced microorganisms," says Schopf.....................


Read more at: https://phys.org/news/2017-12-oldest-fossils-life-earth-began.html#jCp

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Oldest fossils ever found...