Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe GOP Tax Bill Takes Aim at Victims of Natural Disasters
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2017/12/the-gop-tax-bill-takes-aim-at-victims-of-natural-disasters/The GOP Tax Bill Takes Aim at Victims of Natural Disasters
Its about to become much harder to deduct losses incurred from fires and floods.
Amy Thomson
Dec. 19, 2017 6:00 AM
Americans suffered from a spate of deadly wildfires, hurricanes, and floods in 2017. Next year, theyll likely have one less resource to deal with such catastrophes: The GOP tax bill, expected to pass any day now, would eliminate a tax deduction for uninsured casualty losses from natural disasters. Right now, disaster victims can deduct losses that arent insured and that amount to more than 10 percent of their incomes. Under the new tax plan, the deduction could only be claimed for those disasters that the president declares a federal emergency.
In 2015, more than 72,000 people filed a casualty or theft deduction, resulting in $1.6 billion in claims, according to the IRS Statistics of Income Division. (The IRS lumps casualty and theft deductions together in its count). The proposed change would go into effect January 1, 2018, meaning disaster victims could file one final deduction this year if they experienced a loss that did not receive Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) support.
The tragic fires that blazed through California in recent months, along with Texas and Puerto Ricos horrendous hurricanes, did receive federal emergency declaration, so their victims would still qualify for the deduction under the new tax bill. But most disasters arent large enough to attract attention from the White House.
Casualty losses occur in isolation; youre just unlucky and your house burns down in a fire, Steve Rosenthal, a senior fellow at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center at the Urban Institute, said. He thinks getting rid of the casualty loss deduction for most natural disasters is just one more way the Republicans are hoping to raise some revenue: Really, you can look at this as denying deductions in the future for individuals to help pay for the large corporate tax cuts.
The proposed change has some legislators fuming. After the worst fire season in California history, its unbelievable that Republicans are considering eliminating the tax deduction for losses suffered during a natural disaster, Democratic Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Kamala Harris said in a joint press release last month. Asking victims of wildfires or earthquakes to suffer in order to pay for tax cuts for the rich is the height of cruelty.
Whats more, without the casualty loss deduction, declaring a federal emergency could become a political bargaining chip. All emergency and major disaster declarations are made at the discretion of the president, according to FEMA. So what will happen with tax deductions in the futurewill the color of the state matter? Rosenthal says.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 711 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The GOP Tax Bill Takes Aim at Victims of Natural Disasters (Original Post)
babylonsister
Dec 2017
OP
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)1. A Dem President would care about all Americans no matter who they voted for.
And yet, some are still saying that there is no different between the two parties. Shakes head.