Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"permanent" tax cuts. "Permanent" sequester. How "permanent"?
IOW if Dems overtake congress, could they not do away with these "permanent" tax cuts and the "permanent" sequester, replacing these laws with new ones?
How "permanent" is this crap?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 689 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"permanent" tax cuts. "Permanent" sequester. How "permanent"? (Original Post)
CousinIT
Dec 2017
OP
The only things permanent are what is in the constitution and even some of those can and have
shraby
Dec 2017
#2
They can but need the presidency too unless they get a veto proof majority... but happen
Demsrule86
Dec 2017
#6
"Permanent", in this context, just means that the law does not include a sunset clause.
WillowTree
Dec 2017
#8
Kilgore
(1,733 posts)1. Only as permanent as the next election
shraby
(21,946 posts)2. The only things permanent are what is in the constitution and even some of those can and have
been changed.
Otherwise new laws create new realities and sometimes supplant older laws.
Fullduplexxx
(7,864 posts)3. Dems take the house and senate they are history
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)4. Your question is one that needs some airing
By calling their latest scheme "permanent," Republicans are hoping to stampede public opinion like they often do. But as your question anticipates, there's nothing "permanent" in the tax code: everything can be changed. It's the tax code, not the Quran or the Bible.
gordianot
(15,238 posts)5. Permanent is a branding gimmick by the insecure.
They know this will be changed when the opportunity arises. Republicans are the radical opportunists.
Demsrule86
(68,586 posts)6. They can but need the presidency too unless they get a veto proof majority... but happen
that GOP types watching their colleagues go down in flames might help with the repeal...you never know.
Nitram
(22,813 posts)7. The permanent sequester is one reason Virrginia has turned semi-blue.
WillowTree
(5,325 posts)8. "Permanent", in this context, just means that the law does not include a sunset clause.