The Second Amendment has NOTHING to do with hunters.
I know that letting every nutjob in America load up on automatic weapons is inimical to a well-regulated militia. Ask any police force in America what they think about reasonable gun control and theyll tell you that they are all for it. Theres nothing well regulated about letting every nutjob out there buy all the automatic weapons s/he can buy.
I know that more weapons wont help anything. Ask the police what they think about the idea that, if there were only more people carrying more weapons into theaters, wed all be safer. Six people standing up and shooting at each other wont make the rest of us any safer, nor will it allow the police to apprehend the real crazy. Sure, a nutjob with a knife might kill some people, but Im way more willing to believe that some heroic people in the theatre might take hir down than I am to believe that a bunch of armed folks with fantasies of Indiana Jones running through their heads are going to make things safer as they stand up and start blazing away at each other, esp. with me in the middle or with me, standing up to run out of the theatre with G/Son.
I know that this has nothing to do with hunting. Ive eaten meat most of my life. I dont, personally, have a problem with someone who hunts, for example, a deer or a rabbit or a squirrel, in order to feed hir family. I cant find a definitive difference between hunting a deer in the woods and killing a cow in a slaughterhouse, at least, no difference that doesnt favor the hunter. But we need to understand that the Second Amendment has NOTHING to do with hunters. It protects the right of citizens to bear arms in order to allow those citizens to be drafted into a well regulated militia. The government already possesses the power, under the Commerce Clause and under its police power, to regulate arms used for hunting.
Similarly, this has nothing to do with you owning a gun to shoot an intruder (who may or may not be a family member; its usually a family member). The government already possesses the power, under the Commerce Clause and its police power, to regulate arms used for personal security, as opposed to that of a free state protected by a militia.
http://hecatedemeter.wordpress.com/2012/07/23/what-i-learned-in-law-school/#comments