Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Casprings

(347 posts)
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 09:32 AM Dec 2017

Can we get enough votes to Remove Trump in 2018?

First we have to win big in 2018. The GOP must see a bigger threat from the general public then from their base. For the Senate that means.

1. We have to hold all our seats. This is a huge deal as we are defending seats in deep red states.

2. We have to win both AZ and NV. Again, this is a huge tasks, but that gives us 51 votes.

3. We need to pick up McCain’s seat when he resigns or passes away. While I hope McCain the best, the reality is his type of cancer is very hard to treat. That would bring us up to 52 votes.

4. We need to win in TN and TX. In both cases we have very good canidates. In TN, that seat is empty. In TX, we face Ted Cruz. In a huge wave, they are both doable. That gives us 54 seats.

5. With a wave that big, the house goes big too. So actual impeachment won’t be a problem.

Even in this landslide, we need 13 GOP votes to remove Trump. This sort of landslide will scare the shit out of the Republicans, but I don’t know if it will be enough. The 13 most moderate Republicans there in this situation are:

Sen. Thom Tillis
Sen. Joni Ernst
Sen. Rand Paul
Sen. Patrick “Pat” Toomey
Sen. Charles “Chuck” Grassley
Sen. Shelley Capito
Sen. Richard Burr
Sen. Thad Cochran
Sen. Dan Sullivan
Sen. Richard Shelby
Sen. Lamar Alexander
Sen. Lindsey Graham
Sen. Robert “Rob” Portman

Though I don’t think that tells the whole story. I think Sen Sasse, Rubio, etc are possiable gets. That said, this is very hard.

With all of that, is removal from office actually possiable or is this a pipe dream?

105 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Can we get enough votes to Remove Trump in 2018? (Original Post) Casprings Dec 2017 OP
We can't expect it to be a cake walk and need... imanamerican63 Dec 2017 #1
No. The big thing is that 2018 could bring GOP policy to a halt Casprings Dec 2017 #6
We won't get rid of him unless the GOP decides he needs to go...end of story. Demsrule86 Dec 2017 #92
Pipe dream unless mueller finds a smoking gun onenote Dec 2017 #2
Not that we shouldnt do it and try.. Casprings Dec 2017 #4
The Mueller investigation is compromised. Trump's base will never accept any smoking gun... EL34x4 Dec 2017 #26
A lot will depend on the general public in 2020. NT Casprings Dec 2017 #32
Kirsten Gillibrand will lead the charge. Right? n/t rzemanfl Dec 2017 #3
She would be a very likely removal vote. NTo Casprings Dec 2017 #5
One can only hope she is anxious to get good Dems into the Senate too. n/t rzemanfl Dec 2017 #8
Likely democratic women or men who dont touch women without asking. Casprings Dec 2017 #9
You have a compatriot. rzemanfl Dec 2017 #12
Good.. maybe we will start a sub-group Casprings Dec 2017 #24
Maybe you can get together for tea. n/t rzemanfl Dec 2017 #25
More like cabbage and vodka. BannonsLiver Dec 2017 #34
Samovar. n/t rzemanfl Dec 2017 #39
If someone disagrees with me, they must be Russian Casprings Dec 2017 #42
How can a vegetable and a beverage be a personal attack? BannonsLiver Dec 2017 #44
Because the cultural connection to Russia and the context the post was made. NT Casprings Dec 2017 #45
It seems like you're over thinking it. BannonsLiver Dec 2017 #47
You are being deliberately obtuse NT Casprings Dec 2017 #49
Lmao! have you notices how this poster spells a lot of words wrong? Tipperary Dec 2017 #83
Yes, it's definitely a tell. BannonsLiver Dec 2017 #101
Have you "noticed" that that word doesn't end in an "s"? whathehell Dec 2017 #102
Do you even read your stuff? marble falls Dec 2017 #71
More likely a twin or a doppleganger. marble falls Dec 2017 #70
This message was self-deleted by its author Matt_R Dec 2017 #89
I am saying the new senator from MN will likely not touch women without their consent, like the Casprings Dec 2017 #97
This message was self-deleted by its author Matt_R Dec 2017 #105
I am sickened by your comment...an insult to Franken who was never allowed to defend himself Demsrule86 Dec 2017 #93
I am for Harris anyway.. someone also on the right side of this issue NT Casprings Dec 2017 #95
Slime machine came for earlier this year and some on our side jumped aboard...about her time Demsrule86 Dec 2017 #103
He's just out trolling. marble falls Dec 2017 #99
Why? She just got rid of one of the best... pangaia Dec 2017 #76
One of the best thats touched women without their consent. Casprings Dec 2017 #82
LOL MoonRiver Dec 2017 #22
It's a pipe dream Lurks Often Dec 2017 #7
What, Lamar Alexander voting to impeach? sofa king Dec 2017 #46
We can, it's a question of will we. muntrv Dec 2017 #10
If we when the house, impeachment happens by 1 JAN 19 Casprings Dec 2017 #11
Professional is as professional does. n/t rzemanfl Dec 2017 #13
It is unlikely we will be able to remove Trump unless the GOP is on board. So don't impeach without Demsrule86 Dec 2017 #94
This is becoming amusing. cwydro Dec 2017 #14
Obviously controlling the House might make impeachment more likely, the more important thing will be karynnj Dec 2017 #15
66 senators can't agree on the weather crazycatlady Dec 2017 #16
Every second he serves is unsafe for the world. Casprings Dec 2017 #17
Not a pipe dream, it's a nightmare. JustABozoOnThisBus Dec 2017 #18
You dont get impeachment unless you get a GOP house. Casprings Dec 2017 #19
I made an error in my thinking. JustABozoOnThisBus Dec 2017 #20
Congress can't block Pence from assuming the Presidency in case of impeachment and removal WPB_dem Dec 2017 #80
In theory, they could remove both trump and Pence at the same time Casprings Dec 2017 #81
I disagree workinclasszero Dec 2017 #74
I keep hoping the generals are smart enough to delay his launch order. JustABozoOnThisBus Dec 2017 #75
We've got the best chance we could ask for for a big blue wave. Kentonio Dec 2017 #21
Trump isnt as smart as Nixon and the politics are different. Casprings Dec 2017 #23
I see your point, but I did say if Mueller had cast iron evidence. Kentonio Dec 2017 #54
We already have emails from Trump Jr Casprings Dec 2017 #56
It's clear enough for you and me of course Kentonio Dec 2017 #65
That may not be enough for 30 percent of the public Casprings Dec 2017 #67
I'm guessing 25% is the part that will never sway not matter what. Kentonio Dec 2017 #91
Doubtful with gerrymandering, "Russification" a la 2016, cyber interference, Golden Raisin Dec 2017 #27
Pipe dream. shanny Dec 2017 #28
We The People duforsure Dec 2017 #29
Those whack-a-doo wingnuts are "moderates"? HughBeaumont Dec 2017 #30
The most moderate. Its relative to the rest. Casprings Dec 2017 #31
Impeachment will be off the table. I guarantee it. lastlib Dec 2017 #33
If that's our only hope... we have no hope. Joe941 Dec 2017 #55
We need the Senate too! lastlib Dec 2017 #66
The senate is a long shot at best for 2018. Joe941 Dec 2017 #84
Based on unsupported accusations? No. brooklynite Dec 2017 #35
Might not happen whatever the evidence.. Casprings Dec 2017 #37
Depends on whether or not the evidence coming out makes them put on Depends ... L. Coyote Dec 2017 #36
In normal times, the evidence is already there. Casprings Dec 2017 #38
Probably rock Dec 2017 #40
Not true. those are not moderate republicans. rockfordfile Dec 2017 #41
What is a better list of 13 possiable GOP votes? Casprings Dec 2017 #43
Pipe dream with one big caveat bronxiteforever Dec 2017 #48
We are already past the Nixon tapes with Don Jr. and others NT Casprings Dec 2017 #50
Well then impeach Don Jr. Nixon himself was on tape as POTUS approving, bronxiteforever Dec 2017 #53
Ernst and Grassley moderate? rsdsharp Dec 2017 #51
You have to get 13 votes. If you gave a better list of likly votes please post. NT Casprings Dec 2017 #58
There isn't one. EL34x4 Dec 2017 #64
GOP is defending in a lot of places in 2020 too NT Casprings Dec 2017 #68
Seriously, Chuck Grassely a moderate. Compaired with who, Attila the Hun????? marble falls Dec 2017 #72
My Three Point Platform to regain a Majority WPB_dem Dec 2017 #52
4. In November vote for anyone or anything with D after name Eliot Rosewater Dec 2017 #85
Probably not. There are only 8 Republican Senate seats MineralMan Dec 2017 #57
If you win like this, its not the people up in 2018 Casprings Dec 2017 #59
Well Gillibrand took out one elected Dem so it will be harder Exultant Democracy Dec 2017 #60
He gets replaced by a dem and she runs in a special in 18 Casprings Dec 2017 #61
Counting on the voters of the state to play ball after their votes were thrown out? Exultant Democracy Dec 2017 #62
22 percent wanted him to stay Casprings Dec 2017 #63
22% is more then enough to lose a seat if its the wrong voters. Exultant Democracy Dec 2017 #86
It was a seat, we didn't have to defend. It is not a good thing. Demsrule86 Dec 2017 #96
they will turn on him quick IF they find a "smoking gun" krawhitham Dec 2017 #69
Sorry to be a wet blanket fallout87 Dec 2017 #73
He really is not all that popular here. marble falls Dec 2017 #77
Texas is the type is State we will win in the coming years Casprings Dec 2017 #79
It's a big challenge. Sophia4 Dec 2017 #78
You have Capito on that list of "moderates?" Dr_Pretorius Dec 2017 #87
Its relative to the GOP caucus Casprings Dec 2017 #88
I used to live in WV Dr_Pretorius Dec 2017 #104
This message was self-deleted by its author Matt_R Dec 2017 #90
Not a snowballs chance in hell GulfCoast66 Dec 2017 #98
If Dems take House, they *could* vote to impeach Proud Liberal Dem Dec 2017 #100
 

EL34x4

(2,003 posts)
26. The Mueller investigation is compromised. Trump's base will never accept any smoking gun...
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 11:06 AM
Dec 2017

...that will convince them that Trump is guilty of anything. And any Republican elected official whose continued employment in Congress is dependent upon Trump's base going to the polls is never going to vote for impeachment.

Casprings

(347 posts)
24. Good.. maybe we will start a sub-group
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 11:02 AM
Dec 2017

The bottom line is I went from saying, “Al should go because the numbers and diversity of the women” and that being hidden by a jury to posters showing support for someone I consider very brave. Popularity does not equal right. That said, I see it as progress.

 

Tipperary

(6,930 posts)
83. Lmao! have you notices how this poster spells a lot of words wrong?
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 05:17 PM
Dec 2017

We all mistype, but these mistakes are telling I think.

Response to Casprings (Reply #9)

Casprings

(347 posts)
97. I am saying the new senator from MN will likely not touch women without their consent, like the
Wed Dec 27, 2017, 02:05 PM
Dec 2017

Current one.

Response to Casprings (Reply #97)

Demsrule86

(68,628 posts)
93. I am sickened by your comment...an insult to Franken who was never allowed to defend himself
Wed Dec 27, 2017, 02:00 PM
Dec 2017

You know such comments increase my dislike of those who had a hand in the demise of Sen. Franken ...and solidifies my decision to vote for a Democrat who had no involvement in the Franken debacle ...in the 2020 primary or any future primary.

Demsrule86

(68,628 posts)
103. Slime machine came for earlier this year and some on our side jumped aboard...about her time
Wed Dec 27, 2017, 06:51 PM
Dec 2017

as a prosecutor. I like her.

sofa king

(10,857 posts)
46. What, Lamar Alexander voting to impeach?
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 12:41 PM
Dec 2017

The only thing that needs to happen is Donald Trump has to switch parties, and then Lamar would drink Trump's blood.

Piece of cake, right?

Casprings

(347 posts)
11. If we when the house, impeachment happens by 1 JAN 19
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 09:56 AM
Dec 2017

The problem is removal isn’t up to only us. We need to build a strong case with the public and handle this as professionally as possiable.

Demsrule86

(68,628 posts)
94. It is unlikely we will be able to remove Trump unless the GOP is on board. So don't impeach without
Wed Dec 27, 2017, 02:02 PM
Dec 2017

removal...the last thing we need is for Trump or some other repuke to win in 20 because of a similar backlash that happened when Pres. Clinton was impeached...and the GOP went down in flames. New Gingrich was forced to resign in 98 if you remember.

karynnj

(59,504 posts)
15. Obviously controlling the House might make impeachment more likely, the more important thing will be
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 10:05 AM
Dec 2017

the case against him. In the 1990s, the conclusion is that high crimes and misdemeanors are whatever the members of the House or Senate think them to be. I think it also has to be something done as President.

At this point, the strongest case that might be made is obstruction of justice relating to the investigation of Russian collusion. It might be that if Trump becomes more toxic, the Republicans will join in impeaching him knowing they get rid of him and get Pence, a Republican more rightwing than any they would have been able to get elected. If Pence is not linked to anything for which Trump is impeached -- the list of which Republicans back it might be different.

It may cynically come down to whether Republicans consider that they are hurt more by Trump being there than Trump being impeached.

crazycatlady

(4,492 posts)
16. 66 senators can't agree on the weather
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 10:06 AM
Dec 2017

I just don't see it happening. HE'll serve out his term then go down in flames.

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,362 posts)
18. Not a pipe dream, it's a nightmare.
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 10:21 AM
Dec 2017

If Trump gets ousted, Pence takes over, just as evil, but more effective.

If not Pence, then Ryan, whose goal in life is to eliminate Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security.

No, I prefer leaving Trump where he is until 2020.

Casprings

(347 posts)
19. You dont get impeachment unless you get a GOP house.
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 10:26 AM
Dec 2017

And Pence is blocked with a democratic congress. Plus the risk of Trump doing something like in North Korea is there.

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,362 posts)
20. I made an error in my thinking.
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 10:29 AM
Dec 2017

If Pence is not made Prez, then it goes to the Speaker of the House. By that time, it will NOT be Ryan, it will be Pelosi or some other Democrat. Otherwise, there is no impeachment.

 

WPB_dem

(14 posts)
80. Congress can't block Pence from assuming the Presidency in case of impeachment and removal
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 04:16 PM
Dec 2017

The only thing they can affect is the appointment of a new VP.

A new VP would have to be approved by a simple majority of both houses of congress.
Control of the House or Senate would give the Democrats enough control to keep out the most extreme left-wing nutjobs.

Casprings

(347 posts)
81. In theory, they could remove both trump and Pence at the same time
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 04:30 PM
Dec 2017

But no way they hand power over. Still should impeach Pence to tie him to trump in 2020.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
74. I disagree
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 03:20 PM
Dec 2017

Pence is a nutcase American Taliban no doubt but I don't think he is crazy enough to start a nuclear war with NK for shits and grins.

Trump is though. Trump can't wait to see the bodies burning IMO.

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,362 posts)
75. I keep hoping the generals are smart enough to delay his launch order.
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 03:24 PM
Dec 2017

And maybe show him reruns of Hiroshima, to make him think his orders were followed. Bring good doughnuts to his morning security briefing, and he'll think he's in presidential heaven.

"Here's a red button, Mr President. OF COURSE it's connected to real missiles."

edit: delay, not belay.

 

Kentonio

(4,377 posts)
21. We've got the best chance we could ask for for a big blue wave.
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 10:39 AM
Dec 2017

As for impeachment, I don't think our leadership will even consider it unless Mueller returns some cast iron evidence. Even then I can see them agreeing to some kind of resign-pardon deal ala Nixon. It infuriates me, but there just hasn't been any signs that Nancy would consider going after them like that, just like they didn't with the Bush criminals.

Casprings

(347 posts)
23. Trump isnt as smart as Nixon and the politics are different.
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 10:43 AM
Dec 2017

Nixon would have been removed. GOP base might not allow trump to be. He might win the fight.

 

Kentonio

(4,377 posts)
54. I see your point, but I did say if Mueller had cast iron evidence.
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 01:23 PM
Dec 2017

I don't think even Fox would support him if something irrefutable came out, their commentators have even turned on him at times in the last year when he's gone over the top. I think the only way he wins is if they manage to shut down the investigation before the proof is released.

Casprings

(347 posts)
56. We already have emails from Trump Jr
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 01:31 PM
Dec 2017

And a guilty plea that state pretty irrefutable that they tried to work with Russians. We just need to track what is already there and make sure we don’t lose track of that.

 

Kentonio

(4,377 posts)
65. It's clear enough for you and me of course
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 02:10 PM
Dec 2017

But for it to turn the media and the public completely it needs to be the FBI coming out saying 'They commited crimes'. I think that's when it becomes unstoppable and beyond all but the most partisan voices to deny.

Casprings

(347 posts)
67. That may not be enough for 30 percent of the public
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 02:19 PM
Dec 2017

Which is the GOP base. We still need to move forward and build a strong case with the evidence. The point I am making, is there is likely enough there right now.

 

Kentonio

(4,377 posts)
91. I'm guessing 25% is the part that will never sway not matter what.
Wed Dec 27, 2017, 01:53 PM
Dec 2017

That's the level Nixon had still supporting him when he resigned. I think we can work with that.

Golden Raisin

(4,611 posts)
27. Doubtful with gerrymandering, "Russification" a la 2016, cyber interference,
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 11:13 AM
Dec 2017

home-grown meddling and vote suppression. Our election integrity is seriously compromised. To say nothing of if Trump starts a war (N. Korea, Iran, fill-in-the blank.) He and the Republican Congress would cheerfully suspend elections as a "patriotic" necessity. I would put nothing past them.

 

shanny

(6,709 posts)
28. Pipe dream.
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 11:25 AM
Dec 2017

25th Amendment is more likely...and not likely at all.

Only way out is through. Take back Congress, and the White House in 2020 (along the way take back state and local governments). With luck the pResident will keel over from a stroke before then so that at least we won't have a nuclear war, but there will be no early end to the nightmare.

duforsure

(11,885 posts)
29. We The People
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 11:28 AM
Dec 2017

Have the real power of our country's government for ALL of us, not them. Be positive WE can unite , and can do this, or We The People means nothing.

HughBeaumont

(24,461 posts)
30. Those whack-a-doo wingnuts are "moderates"?
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 11:31 AM
Dec 2017

Ever heard Joni Ernst speak? Rob Portman? Rand Paul? Chuck "booze, movies and women" Grassley?

COME on, y'all.

lastlib

(23,261 posts)
33. Impeachment will be off the table. I guarantee it.
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 12:01 PM
Dec 2017

Our only hope is that Pence gets indicted and resigns in disgrace, then AnusMouth has a stroke that turns him into a vegetable. And we take the House next year, putting a D in the line of succession.

 

Joe941

(2,848 posts)
55. If that's our only hope... we have no hope.
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 01:28 PM
Dec 2017

Our best hope is to win the house in 2018 - we need that win! That puts a stop to tRump's agenda for 2 years until the 2020 presidential election. In 2020 the senate will be in play again. So, we have to hold our ground for the next 3 years and limit the damage until we have a chance to really change things back to how Obama left it. I predict we will have all 3 branches of government in 2020.

lastlib

(23,261 posts)
66. We need the Senate too!
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 02:13 PM
Dec 2017

to put clamps on AnusMouth's judicial appointments. IMHO, that is just as important as winning the House.

Come on, Dems, Get Out The Furshlugginer Vote!!

 

Joe941

(2,848 posts)
84. The senate is a long shot at best for 2018.
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 05:23 PM
Dec 2017

In 2020 the senate looks much better just based on the seats up for election.

brooklynite

(94,665 posts)
35. Based on unsupported accusations? No.
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 12:07 PM
Dec 2017

As much as people may feel Trump was involved with or knew about Russian involvement in the election, unless Mueller comes up with authoritative proof, you won't get 2/3 of the Senate to convict him.

Casprings

(347 posts)
37. Might not happen whatever the evidence..
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 12:11 PM
Dec 2017

Plus the evidence in normal times is already there. The campaign was actively trying to get their help and that is on written emails and on plea deals.

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts)
36. Depends on whether or not the evidence coming out makes them put on Depends ...
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 12:10 PM
Dec 2017

I'm thinking absolutely certain proof of "illegitimate election" is forthcoming. Trump is trying to prop up his coup.

Casprings

(347 posts)
38. In normal times, the evidence is already there.
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 12:12 PM
Dec 2017

If this were Obama and his Campaign meet with Russia serveral times, he would be gone.

rock

(13,218 posts)
40. Probably
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 12:20 PM
Dec 2017

But I prefer trying him for high crimes in situ, i.e. while still fulfilling the office of presidink. I believe the presidink is as indictable as anyone else (though it may take more balls).

bronxiteforever

(9,287 posts)
48. Pipe dream with one big caveat
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 12:45 PM
Dec 2017

If Mueller finds substantial direct evidence of felonious conduct by IQ45i.e., Nixon tapes type evidence.

bronxiteforever

(9,287 posts)
53. Well then impeach Don Jr. Nixon himself was on tape as POTUS approving,
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 01:19 PM
Dec 2017

,authorizing and paying for criminal acts. Your question was how to get to 13 rethugs to join Democratic Senators in approving impeachment. With the GOP it will require proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

If a Democratic President did anything wrong, mere innuendo would be enough for that “great deliberative body” to impeach.

 

EL34x4

(2,003 posts)
64. There isn't one.
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 01:59 PM
Dec 2017

You're not going to get 13 GOP senators to impeach Trump. It doesn't matter what evidence the Mueller investigation presents.

marble falls

(57,137 posts)
72. Seriously, Chuck Grassely a moderate. Compaired with who, Attila the Hun?????
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 03:11 PM
Dec 2017


That other "moderate" Alex Jones loves ol' Chuckie.
 

WPB_dem

(14 posts)
52. My Three Point Platform to regain a Majority
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 01:04 PM
Dec 2017

1. Pledge to work to find a fair resolution to the Student Loan crisis
Something fair to the lenders and borrowers and people who have worked hard to pay off their loans. Also some measures to reduce student loan debt to people majoring in disciplines that will never result in a job that will enable payback.

2. Pledge to work toward legalization of recreational marijuana.
remove it from the federal list of narcotics and encourage state governments to legalize and tax MJ.

3. Introduce a plan to fix and expand the ACA. Democratic candidates repeatedly suggested mending the ACA but never came out with a list of what they would change.

These changes will energize the youth vote and deliver a nice wave of young blue voters.

Been lurking here for a while, happy to have finally joined

MineralMan

(146,321 posts)
57. Probably not. There are only 8 Republican Senate seats
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 01:36 PM
Dec 2017

up for election in 2018. That's not enough for the 67 votes needed to remove Trump.

So, the answer is no.

Casprings

(347 posts)
59. If you win like this, its not the people up in 2018
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 01:40 PM
Dec 2017

It’s the senators up in 2020 and putting pressure on them.

Exultant Democracy

(6,594 posts)
60. Well Gillibrand took out one elected Dem so it will be harder
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 01:40 PM
Dec 2017

It isn't like Al was from a safe blue state, and this is going to leave a very bad taste in the mouths of a lot of the voters who live there. We may have just given away a safe seat.

Exultant Democracy

(6,594 posts)
62. Counting on the voters of the state to play ball after their votes were thrown out?
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 01:45 PM
Dec 2017

The only fact that matters is we have one more seat we have to pour resources into defending. Even in a wave election politics are local, and this disgusting debacle will be a millstone around our necks.

Exultant Democracy

(6,594 posts)
86. 22% is more then enough to lose a seat if its the wrong voters.
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 09:53 PM
Dec 2017

And more importantly what you ignored is that we are playing defense now on a seat that was safe. Defending a seat cost infinity more money than not having a race, and we have to pull all that money out of other races.

krawhitham

(4,645 posts)
69. they will turn on him quick IF they find a "smoking gun"
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 02:42 PM
Dec 2017

Many are hopping for a reason get rid themselves of Trump before he completely destroys the GOP, they are just too scared do make a move in case it does not work and the Nazi base turns on them

 

fallout87

(819 posts)
73. Sorry to be a wet blanket
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 03:16 PM
Dec 2017

But if you thin Ted Cruz is going to lose in Texas, you may need to re-evaluate the rest of your predictions.

Casprings

(347 posts)
79. Texas is the type is State we will win in the coming years
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 04:01 PM
Dec 2017

2018 might be early, but a wave can do odd things.

 

Sophia4

(3,515 posts)
78. It's a big challenge.
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 03:41 PM
Dec 2017

The California Republicans who voted for the tax bill should be very vulnerable.

We need to go door to door and explain what that tax bill will mean for California and for the better off in California who will pay through the nose just because they live in California, a state with a lot of infrastructure costs that other states don't have like water management, etc.

Casprings

(347 posts)
88. Its relative to the GOP caucus
Wed Dec 27, 2017, 12:02 AM
Dec 2017

I went off of ideological scoring based on votes. Bottom line is, you are going to need 13 votes. Might be be impossiable.

Response to Casprings (Original post)

GulfCoast66

(11,949 posts)
98. Not a snowballs chance in hell
Wed Dec 27, 2017, 02:05 PM
Dec 2017

And advocating for does not help us in any way possible. It will fire up the demoralized moderate republican voters and when it does not happen it will devastate the over enthusiastic on our side.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,422 posts)
100. If Dems take House, they *could* vote to impeach
Wed Dec 27, 2017, 05:18 PM
Dec 2017

The Senate is a longshot and even if we win it by a bare majority, I doubt that there will be enough votes to convict, even among Democrats. For Trump to be removed from office, a good number of Republicans will have to be persuaded to vote to do so by incontrovertible evidence of serious wrongdoing. Unfortunately, I don't see it happening. Many Republicans seem to be hitching their anchor to him and who knows how tied up in the Russia investigation some of them may be, so they will be fighting for their own preservation as much as Trump's. Hopefully, at the bare minimum, Democrats will put a screeching halt to the Trump/GOP agenda in Congress for the last half of Trump's Presidency and we make him a single-term President in 2020.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can we get enough votes t...