Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Atman

(31,464 posts)
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 06:14 PM Dec 2017

I understand Nadler and those "reluctant to pursue impeachment."

As much as I'd love to see Trump dragged from office kicking and screaming, I don't see how it is a good strategy to hope for.

The GOP's own impeachment of Bill Clinton made a mockery of the process. Impeachment for a blow job. Impeachment proceeding against Trump will only serve to underscore (in the GOPs' minds) what a sham the procedure is. It will be viewed as just retaliation, more "fake news." Plus, we just wind up with Pence.

I'd much prefer to see hard-core pressure, both legal and professional, kept on Trump. Let him try to govern with a Democratic majority Congress, leading up to his losing the 2012 election. Stop him in his tracks, then prosecute him once he leaves office.

There is nothing a raging narcissist hates more than being called out for being just another stupid raging narcissist. His lack of actual power will drive him even more insane than he already is. If that leads to him, say...choking on some KFC...so be it. But I think impeachment is not our best course.

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I understand Nadler and those "reluctant to pursue impeachment." (Original Post) Atman Dec 2017 OP
it's image management. we can't be seen as drooling for the opportunity. unblock Dec 2017 #1
Like with Nixon, the politicians can't lead gratuitous Dec 2017 #2
The impeachment of Bill Clinton was innoculation for the GOP's fascist agenda. haele Dec 2017 #8
I don't disagree gratuitous Dec 2017 #10
Yes. Impeaching him at this point would be seen as simply payback for Clinton... TreasonousBastard Dec 2017 #3
Bush and Cheney knowingly and deliberately lied us into a war Chasstev365 Dec 2017 #4
Youre forgetting about the politics part. Atman Dec 2017 #5
And taking it off the table, MurrayDelph Dec 2017 #6
BINGO! Chasstev365 Dec 2017 #7
Obama already won in 2012 - though I'd desperately love to turn back the clock Rhiannon12866 Dec 2017 #9

unblock

(52,281 posts)
1. it's image management. we can't be seen as drooling for the opportunity.
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 06:20 PM
Dec 2017

and any republicans we hope to vote to remove *definitely* need to be seen as very reluctantly going along based on overwhelming evidence.

just because nadler and other democrats in congress are *now* saying they're not eager doesn't mean it won't happen.

the dynamic changes after mueller released more indictments and evidence and testimony emerges.

our congresspeople need to be seen as forced into this by a media and public outraged by the facts and evidence of crimes.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
2. Like with Nixon, the politicians can't lead
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 06:36 PM
Dec 2017

Your analogy to Clinton is pretty correct; the Clinton impeachment was nothing so much as sore-loserdom writ large. They couldn't get him out of office any other way, and the ridiculous impeachment spectacle debased our political system so badly it led to the second President Bush and President Trump. But the Republicans knew all along they weren't going to get a removal vote in the Senate; they didn't even get a majority vote on any of their articles.

But it played to their hyperpartisan base. Just like their eternal posturing on abortion and firearm regulation and their soon to be eternal posturing on same sex marriage, Republicans have their pet issues that keep the faithful faithful.

Trump should be impeached and removed from office. But it will have to be a true groundswell, an irresistible tide of facts, testimony, and evidence that will be carried by public opinion, before Congress will act. The Nixon example is instructive. Nixon was holding fast to the presidency for months, even as the daily revelations of the Watergate hearings poured out ever more lurid details of the administration's wrong-doing. It seemed like it would never end. Than the June 23, 1972 tape was released, providing the "smoking gun" that Nixon was indeed up to his beady little eyeballs in Watergate, and had been so from the get-go. It took just four days from the release of that tape until Nixon's resignation.

I don't see Trump resigning. He'll have to be pried out of the Oval Office like a chicken nugget wedged in the bottom of the box. But once the articles of impeachment are drawn up, it will be when the case for removal is so clear that even the likes of Orrin Hatch and Devin Nunes can no longer deny it.

haele

(12,665 posts)
8. The impeachment of Bill Clinton was innoculation for the GOP's fascist agenda.
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 11:00 PM
Dec 2017

By investigation and impeachment proceedings on basically trivial, confusing, and charges, the bar for High Crimes was lowered to misdemeanor. Treason is now the same as lying about about an admittedly improper consensual blow job for the general public.

Haele

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
10. I don't disagree
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 11:38 PM
Dec 2017

The political landscape has been seared over as with a hot branding iron (as the good book says), and we have trouble delineating degrees of right and wrong. That's why it's the vox populi which has to lead the political consensus. Clearly the administration will minimize everything it has done wrong, but we have to be that consistent voice for norms and ethics. We can't let the media get away with their well-cultivated "both sides" shrug any longer. We also need to show Democrats that we have their back, and will support their efforts when they move in the right direction.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
3. Yes. Impeaching him at this point would be seen as simply payback for Clinton...
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 06:38 PM
Dec 2017

Nixon opened China and gave us the EPA. He had the potential to be one of our greatest presidents, but he blew it. Big time. And the whole nation knew it. Republicans agreed he had to go, and showed him the door to avoid impeachment.

The narcissist-in-chief is nowhere in any league with Nixon. He is merely a fool with no direction or talent. He could be impeached if he does something more idiotic and horrific than he has so far, but better we just get a Democratic Congress next year and control him.

At this point, he has some uncanny control over Congressional Republicans and the deep split between the parties means nothing but trouble.

Chasstev365

(5,191 posts)
4. Bush and Cheney knowingly and deliberately lied us into a war
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 06:45 PM
Dec 2017

that killed over 5,000 Americans, wounded and physiologically ruined 1,000's more, and killed over 100,000 innocent Iraqi civilians, but impeachment was "Off the Table."

All indications are that the Trump campaign knowingly and deliberately colluded with a former high official in the KGB and current dictator of Russia, one Vladimir Putin.

If these aren't worthy of impeachment, let's just amend the constitution and get rid of the impeachment process because It's just too darn hard to do politically.

GIVE ME A BREAK!!

Atman

(31,464 posts)
5. Youre forgetting about the politics part.
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 09:03 PM
Dec 2017

Just sayin...knowing the crime is going on isn’t enough. Being able to successfully prosecute is a whole other thing.

MurrayDelph

(5,300 posts)
6. And taking it off the table,
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 09:30 PM
Dec 2017

along with not pursuing war crimes, told the Republicans there are no consequences for their actions.

Rhiannon12866

(205,731 posts)
9. Obama already won in 2012 - though I'd desperately love to turn back the clock
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 11:08 PM
Dec 2017

And give him another 4 years...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I understand Nadler and t...