Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

applegrove

(118,778 posts) Wed Dec 27, 2017, 12:27 AM Dec 2017

2

Maggie Haberman on Omarosa.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Continue to be confused by Omarosa remaining on government payroll through next month but apparently not going to work and not being bound by White House rules. Can anyone point to a similar govt employee instance?</p>— Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) <a href="

Link to tweet

?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 27, 2017</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Maggie Haberman on Omarosa. (Original Post) applegrove Dec 2017 OP

All Republican members of Congress who were paid for eight years while doing nothing question everything Dec 2017 #1

Not going to work, not being bound by WH rules, but remaining on payroll? jmowreader Dec 2017 #2

Thread win! sheshe2 Dec 2017 #3

Oh no. Someonesy else has something on Trump. applegrove Dec 2017 #4

Ha! Freethinker65 Dec 2017 #5

Gee Maggie, if only there was some way you could disseminate this information gratuitous Dec 2017 #6

Right. Isn't she a reporter? madaboutharry Dec 2017 #7

question everything

(47,534 posts)

1. All Republican members of Congress who were paid for eight years while doing nothing

Reply to applegrove (Original post)

Wed Dec 27, 2017, 12:31 AM

Dec 2017

I don't twit but would love for someone to reply..

jmowreader

(50,562 posts)

2. Not going to work, not being bound by WH rules, but remaining on payroll?

Reply to applegrove (Original post)

Wed Dec 27, 2017, 12:36 AM

Dec 2017

sheshe2

(83,898 posts)

3. Thread win!

Reply to jmowreader (Reply #2)

Wed Dec 27, 2017, 12:41 AM

Dec 2017

applegrove

(118,778 posts)

4. Oh no. Someonesy else has something on Trump.

Reply to jmowreader (Reply #2)

Wed Dec 27, 2017, 12:41 AM

Dec 2017

Freethinker65

(10,048 posts)

5. Ha!

Reply to jmowreader (Reply #2)

Wed Dec 27, 2017, 12:51 AM

Dec 2017

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)

6. Gee Maggie, if only there was some way you could disseminate this information

Reply to applegrove (Original post)

Wed Dec 27, 2017, 01:04 AM

Dec 2017

Do you know any reporters?

madaboutharry

(40,220 posts)

7. Right. Isn't she a reporter?

Reply to gratuitous (Reply #6)

Wed Dec 27, 2017, 01:29 AM

Dec 2017

May she should do some investigating and report back to us.

Reply to this discussion

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Maggie Haberman on Omaros...