General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumshelp me with the process!
if the Democrat Shelly Simonds is successful,with there appeal, what are the next steps? Can that decision also be appealed? (I HOPE NOT)
brooklynite
(94,727 posts)bluestarone
(17,030 posts)brooklynite
(94,727 posts)bluestarone
(17,030 posts)thought you meant election would be tie. Now i see what you said TY. So the Repubs cannot appeal again right?
kentuck
(111,110 posts)Both names were circled in black.
But Simonds had a line thru it and the Republican did not?
It was first read as a vote for Simonds.
I'm not so sure?
bluestarone
(17,030 posts)then decided to count it later causing a tie? (i thought she was leading by 1 vote) Am i wrong?
unblock
(52,317 posts)then they refused to certify the election on the grounds that this one ballot should be counted as a vote for the republican, leading to a tied election.
the ballot had both candidates' circles filled in, supporting the argument that it was an invalid overvote.
but the circle for the democrat had a single line through it, supporting the argument that it was "crossed-out" and therefore meant to be a vote for the republican.
i think. i've seen some confusing articles on this matter....
unblock
(52,317 posts)however they had counted or not counted that particular ballot, at the stage in question they were only certifying the results, not going through individual ballots. supposedly it wasn't the time or place to challenge individual ballots.
so the question is, was it proper to refuse to certify the results due to a single disputed ballot?
and if so, shouldn't there be a more extensive review (or perhaps i should say, *another* review) of all ballots, rather than just a decision based on a single ballot?
bluestarone
(17,030 posts)If she wins this appeal, IS IT THE END OF IT? or CAN THEY APPEAL? TY to who can answer this part!!
unblock
(52,317 posts)bluestarone
(17,030 posts)so here we go again