Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Thu Dec 28, 2017, 05:52 PM Dec 2017

Guidelines for news-watching and staying sane in 2018 - By Jennifer Rubin

By Jennifer Rubin December 28 at 1:00 PM

For political-watchers, news media, political operatives, candidates and officials, 2017 was — let’s be honest — exhausting. The constant churn of news, the unending assaults on our sense of decency and expectations for government officials, the carousel of White House advisers (“according to Kathryn Dunn-Tenpas, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution who has tracked White House turnover rates over three decades, the Trump administration’s 34% turnover rate—21 of the 61 senior officials she has tracked have resigned, been fired or reassigned—is much higher than that of any other administration in the last 40 years”), the barrage of presidential tweets, the nonstop Trump rationalization and water-carrying from Senate and House Republicans, the twists and turns of the Russia investigation, a series of high-drama special elections, the near-death experience of Obamacare, the ups and downs of the noxious tax bill designed to enrich President Trump and his ilk, the roiling of international relations, the president’s disgusting embrace of autocrats and the endless lies left many Americans drained. Anger — even righteous anger — experienced over a long period of time is exhausting. The solution, however, is not to be less outraged — indeed, sustaining outrage is essential to defense of our democracy — but to follow some simple political survival rules.

First, follow the example of Lawfare blog’s Ben Wittes. Seeing the unprecedented and outrageous attacks on the FBI emanating from Trump and his GOP lackeys, Wittes decided to turn the tables on the FBI smearers. “I responded by making a contribution to the FBI Agents Association and tweeting urging others to do so in the names of Andrew McCabe and James Baker,” he says via email in reference to the maligned FBI deputy director and FBI counsel, respectively. “According to the association, more than 2,000 people have done so this month, apparently raising more than $140,000–which they describe as a significant uptick in their donations from last year.” He pointed out, “The effort also generated a significant amount of news coverage and media attention (Joe Scarborough tweeted it) and got major buy-in from senior intelligence community leadership.” He tweeted that he is looking at “a Proposal to Translate Malicious Trump Tweets into Public Goods.” Follow Wittes for more joint efforts — or start your own. You’ll find that passive news-watching may be enervating, but action is energizing.

Second, stop expecting Republicans in Congress to “do the right thing.” Too many spent too much time waiting for the moment when Republicans “would finally break with Trump.” There is no utterance, tweet, action, policy or financial chicanery likely to prompt action by Republicans. A devastating report from the special counsel? Don’t count on Republicans to take it seriously. Once you’ve made peace with that, you can focus on the real action: holding those Republicans accountable in the 2018 elections.

Third, we’ve already advised to stop paying attention to Rust Belt diners and start focusing on suburban, college-educated women. (Others are now in on the act.) You can spare yourself the frustration of watching the same 25 percent of the electorate, seeped in Fox News drivel, refuse to acknowledge reality. They’re not going to confess that they were conned or they were wrong. They will continue to revel in their own ignorance. So be it.

Fourth, Trump’s personnel changes hardly matter at all. Trump did not get more sane, more stable or more astute when John Kelly replaced Reince Priebus as chief of staff. No one in a position of power can or will challenge Trump; there are only less or more adept enablers. Aside from Defense Secretary Jim Mattis, the departure of any senior official(s) — including Secretary of State Rex Tillerson — won’t significantly impact the direction of the administration. New officials could be worse, to be sure. If CIA Director Mike Pompeo is replaced by Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), a ruthlessly ambitious and sycophantic Trump supporter, great damage could be done to the agency. However, don’t expect any new addition or replacement to markedly improve the administration.

Fifth, thank goodness the media has stopped announcing that Trump has finally become more presidential. There are no pivots, no turning points. Trump does not learn, improve or mature. Whatever glimmer of rationality and decency we spot will be either illusory or fleeting. Save yourself the disappointment and accept that, if anything, the pressure of the presidency will further destabilize Trump’s psyche.

In sum, turn anger into action; lower or eliminate expectations for Republicans; stop fixating on the core Trump cultists; don’t expect new personnel to improve matters and understand that Trump will never become an acceptable president. Once you’ve done all that, you can focus energy on the 2018 midterms (where all the action is), support those candidates and organizations that reflect your values, remain engaged in your community, model good citizenship and civility for your family and friends, and remember, as we saw in the presently tied Virginia House of Delegates race, your vote may be the deciding one.

###

Full article posted with permission

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Guidelines for news-watching and staying sane in 2018 - By Jennifer Rubin (Original Post) DonViejo Dec 2017 OP
Thank you, Madame Rubin saidsimplesimon Dec 2017 #1
Don V jodymarie aimee Dec 2017 #2
I would like to KnR but Tbear Dec 2017 #3
KnR is simply RandomAccess Dec 2017 #5
Just post a reply and it kicks the thread back to the top of the list lunatica Dec 2017 #8
These other posts explain how to kick (k) the thread. To recommend it (r), just click tblue37 Dec 2017 #11
This is great RandomAccess Dec 2017 #4
Yup - very helpful. Forget rehabilitating the RePutin Party. Just kick 'em out! lagomorph777 Dec 2017 #10
Sorry, but "treasure" goes a little too far in this case Jim Lane Dec 2017 #12
Excellent piece from one of the Never Trumpers Stinky The Clown Dec 2017 #6
These are the right words at the right time lunatica Dec 2017 #7
K&R uponit7771 Dec 2017 #9
K&R smirkymonkey Dec 2017 #13
 

jodymarie aimee

(3,975 posts)
2. Don V
Thu Dec 28, 2017, 06:02 PM
Dec 2017

you are the best..thank you always.Your posts more than make up for the what is Melania wearing gossip !!

Tbear

(488 posts)
3. I would like to KnR but
Thu Dec 28, 2017, 08:41 PM
Dec 2017

I don't know how or am unable to.
Please remove the "executive summary" from the end of the post and put it at the beginning so it will be more likely to be read.

This is a call to action, and I am shamefully, finally listening.

Anyone else?

 

RandomAccess

(5,210 posts)
5. KnR is simply
Thu Dec 28, 2017, 09:35 PM
Dec 2017

making a post of some kind to the thread -- like yours, or just "KnR" -- so that the thread gets kicked up to the top of the page and doesn't sink below the 1st page, to be lost forever for all practical purposes.

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
8. Just post a reply and it kicks the thread back to the top of the list
Fri Dec 29, 2017, 01:18 AM
Dec 2017

It gives others a chance to read it and reply too.

tblue37

(65,490 posts)
11. These other posts explain how to kick (k) the thread. To recommend it (r), just click
Fri Dec 29, 2017, 02:35 AM
Dec 2017

the "recommend" button--labeled "DU rec"--at the bottom left of the original post.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
12. Sorry, but "treasure" goes a little too far in this case
Fri Dec 29, 2017, 02:06 PM
Dec 2017

Rubin is a thoroughgoing right-winger who happens to belong to the subspecies "Never-Trump right-winger". Trump is the predominant subject of contemporary political dialog (with pro-Trump and anti-Trump being very prominent), and Rubin in particular is focused on Trump and so spends much of her time bashing him.

She's still a conservative, though. If someone like Cruz or Kasich were in office, she'd be an enthusiastic cheerleader.

If we must have right-wingers, of course, better to have never-Trump right-wingers who will join in criticizing him. So I'm glad Rubin is on board but I don't see her as a long-term ally.

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
7. These are the right words at the right time
Fri Dec 29, 2017, 01:13 AM
Dec 2017

I’ve come to this conclusion too. We need to save this country ourselves by backing the right organizations and people and by voting.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Guidelines for news-watch...