Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

exboyfil

(17,865 posts)
2. He is including in Finance committee meeting where they
Fri Dec 29, 2017, 07:10 PM
Dec 2017

talked about tax policy. It is a ridiculous assertion. Major aspects of the bill were being written by lobbyists as it was hitting the floor after reconciliation.


Republicans are right that the Finance Committee has been working on major tax policy for years. They’ve had working groups and options papers and public hearings. They’ve been hearing from constituents and debating ideas.

“We have been discussing tax reform for years and the time for action is right now,” said Sen. Charles Grassley (R., Iowa).

But they also haven’t had a specific hearing or deep discussion of the proposal that Chairman Orrin Hatch (R., Utah) released last week. That proposal includes novel ideas on international taxation and pass-through businesses that haven’t gotten thorough attention.

“This isn’t a real debate,” said Sen. Ron Wyden (D., Ore.), pointing to the years of work that led up to the 1986 tax law. “This is an abandonment of Reagan-style tax reform.”

https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/tax-bill-2017/card/1510607902

Ms. Toad

(34,095 posts)
3. Ask how many they had after there was a published final version of the bill.
Fri Dec 29, 2017, 07:10 PM
Dec 2017

If they are honest, they will say zero.

elleng

(131,136 posts)
5. 'Critics of the House Republicans tax bill have not only gone after its substance, but its process.
Fri Dec 29, 2017, 07:12 PM
Dec 2017

During a markup of the bill by the House Ways and Means Committee, one Democratic committee member -- Rep. John Larson of Connecticut -- gave a stemwinder of an indictment that gained some currency on social media.

Comparing the House consideration of the current Republican tax bill unfavorably with the process that led to the landmark 1986 tax bill, Larson said that "no one was allowed to come forward. ... No one from the administration will even sit in front of us. We are the oldest committee in Congress, many would argue the most prestigious, and members on this side of the aisle aren't even entitled to bring an expert witness on any aspect of the tax code that affects 100 percent of our economy."

When we took a closer look, we found that both parties have valid arguments to air.'>>>

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2017/nov/22/john-larson/did-house-committee-bar-democratic-witnesses-gop-t/

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
8. There were no public hearings.
Fri Dec 29, 2017, 07:13 PM
Dec 2017

Zero.

Perhaps the Rep had this confused with the ACA, which had a year of hearings.

procon

(15,805 posts)
12. If they were public, wouldn't there be transcripts?
Fri Dec 29, 2017, 07:46 PM
Dec 2017

Ask for links, dates and locations, lists of the experts, stakeholders, and CBO reports. You'll never get anything, but that's an indictment of his honesty in itself.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I got a letter from my re...