Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
108 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Will Sen Gillibrand run in her reelection or bypass it to run for Potus in 2020. (Original Post) CK_John Jan 2018 OP
Her reelection is this year crazycatlady Jan 2018 #1
Maybe dhol82 Jan 2018 #3
Her hate is mostly on this board crazycatlady Jan 2018 #5
What??? dhol82 Jan 2018 #8
My parents vote in NY crazycatlady Jan 2018 #14
Oh, your parents love her? Well, never mind, then. kcr Jan 2018 #24
Al Franken is no longer a senator crazycatlady Jan 2018 #44
Glad you're happy n/lt kcr Jan 2018 #50
You know what cat lady...you ain't so crazy. n/t Kirk Lover Jan 2018 #70
We had a nice thing until Guillibrand trashed him for nothing Alice11111 Jan 2018 #84
Could you point to your criticism of someone's pro-franked anecdotal post? brooklynite Jan 2018 #72
You're hilarious n/t kcr Jan 2018 #92
She is just fine in NY, but in my view I prefer someone else for President in 2020. She was one of still_one Jan 2018 #105
I am a NY voter ... NanceGreggs Jan 2018 #34
I am a NY voter... brooklynite Jan 2018 #75
Perhaps not, but her back and forth positions on the anti-boycott law and gun control sure imply still_one Jan 2018 #106
I don't agree...and she won't win a primary. She can run for her seat and president too... Demsrule86 Jan 2018 #40
Agree LeftInTX Jan 2018 #93
And the people of Minnesota don't care for or about dflprincess Jan 2018 #66
Speak for yourself Kirk Lover Jan 2018 #19
Isn't that what each person who posts a comment here does? still_one Jan 2018 #107
No, it is not. Read some of the comments in the NYT. Alice11111 Jan 2018 #27
Good points CentralMass Jan 2018 #78
Thx Alice11111 Jan 2018 #85
Yes and also No maxsolomon Jan 2018 #2
She's running for reelection in 2018 and will win handily onenote Jan 2018 #4
Maybe dhol82 Jan 2018 #9
Okay, I'll bite. Who is going to make a credible run at her in 2018 onenote Jan 2018 #10
I will wait and see who her opponents are dhol82 Jan 2018 #13
You live in NY? Kirk Lover Jan 2018 #20
Ummmmm, yeah. dhol82 Jan 2018 #23
Why would I have a problem with me asking you that question? Obvi the problems are Kirk Lover Jan 2018 #25
Um, you have never had a conversation with a New Yorker? dhol82 Jan 2018 #28
Speak for yourself....and please stop the bullshit sterotype that New Yorkers are rude because Kirk Lover Jan 2018 #47
Damn. Talk about sensitive! dhol82 Jan 2018 #53
No worries...I can take it and boy do I dish it...I am awful on twitter...just AWFUL. ) Kirk Lover Jan 2018 #56
Agree. We need to disagree politely. Alice11111 Jan 2018 #59
Fuck yeah! Kirk Lover Jan 2018 #60
!!!! We have a sense of humor here!!! Alice11111 Jan 2018 #63
Well put, 82. Alice11111 Jan 2018 #26
Thank you. dhol82 Jan 2018 #30
There are three republicans vying for the GOP nomination onenote Jan 2018 #81
You mean like Zephyr Teachout who couldn't win statewide ever? Demsrule86 Jan 2018 #102
Thankfully her Senate race is safe. Demsrule86 Jan 2018 #42
Nope. Alice11111 Jan 2018 #57
And who will be doing that? onenote Jan 2018 #82
They won't kick her out. You don't know New york. Demsrule86 Jan 2018 #101
Running for reelection and running in 2020 doesn't look very good. Also CK_John Jan 2018 #11
So I guess that takes Warren, Klobuchar, and Kaine out of the running too. Among others. onenote Jan 2018 #12
No the people that may primary are a former head of HUD; CK_John Jan 2018 #18
I wish Al or Hillary would run. Bloomberg could probably Alice11111 Jan 2018 #29
+1 dhol82 Jan 2018 #31
Oh, yes, it'd be wonderful if Hillary ran! lunamagica Jan 2018 #37
Schumer may be more popular in NY than Hillary onenote Jan 2018 #71
Maybe...maybe not lunamagica Jan 2018 #88
bookmarking. onenote Jan 2018 #89
OK, we'll see lunamagica Jan 2018 #91
Or Hillary Clinton running in 2006 ... before running for the nomination in 2008 karynnj Jan 2018 #48
She's not running for reelection in 2020. She's running in 2018 crazycatlady Jan 2018 #15
The question is will she run in 2018? CK_John Jan 2018 #22
And the answer is yes she will and she will win. onenote Jan 2018 #77
Care to name any? brooklynite Jan 2018 #79
DJs Clam Shack. NCTraveler Jan 2018 #6
. Squinch Jan 2018 #7
She'll be lucky to get re-elected. TheCowsCameHome Jan 2018 #16
Don't bash Dem's it's a forum rule ya know. Kirk Lover Jan 2018 #21
It is not bashing a Dem when this woman has tried to take out Alice11111 Jan 2018 #32
+1 lunamagica Jan 2018 #39
Um yes it is Alice...any bashing of any democrat is frowned upon...perhaps you should Kirk Lover Jan 2018 #41
Well, it wasn't me. Never alerted on anybody yet. Free discussion Alice11111 Jan 2018 #64
Oh I don't think it was you! I don't even give it a thought of who it was or wasn't....all I need Kirk Lover Jan 2018 #73
Well at least you are honest GaryCnf Jan 2018 #55
He was punished, impeached, much more, plus he had affairs Alice11111 Jan 2018 #58
Mind you, I don't approve of Gillebrand GaryCnf Jan 2018 #67
You are making this argument to a civil rights litigator of 30 years, Alice11111 Jan 2018 #69
We're in total agreement re Franken GaryCnf Jan 2018 #80
Yes it is bashing a Dem...and Hillary is not running. Demsrule86 Jan 2018 #94
By what measure? Trumpocalypse Jan 2018 #97
Being pissed off is not bashing dhol82 Jan 2018 #33
I personally don't care...I prefer dissent but I just got a Kirk Lover Jan 2018 #38
Um, looks like you might have to revisit what you think is considered bashing dhol82 Jan 2018 #45
Yes I personally approve of dissent against Dem's if you feel it.....BUT THE FORUM DOES NOT. Kirk Lover Jan 2018 #46
Of course I understand that dhol82 Jan 2018 #51
So now you just assume that I'm wearing underwear..... Kirk Lover Jan 2018 #52
I personally feel you should save your 'dissent' for Republicans and am glad that the forum doesn't Demsrule86 Jan 2018 #95
Well I'm not the one who is dissenting. I support all Dem's...Period. Kirk Lover Jan 2018 #100
I am aware of that...I was just making a comment in general not about you. Demsrule86 Jan 2018 #103
Thank you for clarifying that and I do agree with you! Kirk Lover Jan 2018 #104
If we can't disagree, improve, we won't kick Repub arses. Alice11111 Jan 2018 #65
Talking against the party on this forum or any forum discourages voters from joining our party Demsrule86 Jan 2018 #96
Yeah, I've heard that. TheCowsCameHome Jan 2018 #61
Did I alert on you? That's weird because I'm not an alerter...EVER. Kirk Lover Jan 2018 #62
I just can't see her getting the 2020 nom. LeftInTX Jan 2018 #17
Yes We Do!!!! Lots of good Dems! Dems who could win!! Alice11111 Jan 2018 #35
She is not totally beloved in New York dhol82 Jan 2018 #36
A Repub could win her Senate seat, as many Dems will NOT Alice11111 Jan 2018 #43
She basically started out as a dem masquerading as a Republican or vice versa. dhol82 Jan 2018 #49
And, of course, if she is the democratic candidate I will vote for her. dhol82 Jan 2018 #54
She will never get mine. Alice11111 Jan 2018 #68
Yes, she joined the Blue Dog Caucus in the House and was Vadem Jan 2018 #86
Yep Alice11111 Jan 2018 #108
Evidence? brooklynite Jan 2018 #74
Try reading the comments in the NYTimes. Alice11111 Jan 2018 #76
which repub. and when do they plan to file their candidacy. onenote Jan 2018 #83
Dems will vote for her and you should stop... Demsrule86 Jan 2018 #98
Who's going to beat her? Some placeholder Republicon? customerserviceguy Jan 2018 #87
She will not get the nomination. LiberalFighter Jan 2018 #90
Can't afford purity or hurt feelings in 2020 Proud Liberal Dem Jan 2018 #99

crazycatlady

(4,492 posts)
5. Her hate is mostly on this board
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 07:30 PM
Jan 2018

By November, it will be water under the bridge. IN fact it should be already, but he's got a loyal fan base a la the Bey hive here. I've taken to hiding posts about him because the horse is already dead and doesn't need to be beaten anymore. LEt Tina Smith do her job.

She won with 72% in 2012.

I really don't think that the people of New York care about a senator from Minnesota.

dhol82

(9,353 posts)
8. What???
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 07:42 PM
Jan 2018

I am a New York voter and I damn well care about Al Franken.
I never thought Gillibrand was all that awesome to begin with. We will see what happens during the primary.
All I can say is that she damn well better be fucking brilliant in the coming months!
We lost one of the most effective democratic voices in the senate. Gillibrand is nowhere close to replacing it.

crazycatlady

(4,492 posts)
14. My parents vote in NY
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 08:07 PM
Jan 2018

And they love her. WHen Franken resigned, my dad's response was 'get him out of there' because he said everytime someone else came forward, it occupied the headlines for a day. Now that he is no longer in the senate, if 100 more women came forward, it would not be in the headlines.

My mom is constantly signing her praises. If I still lived in NY, I'd vote for her. NY is a big state. Bigger than DU.

(FWIW I had a neutral opinion on Franken as a senator. He never stood out positively or negatively to me. There are louder voices against Trump.)

crazycatlady

(4,492 posts)
44. Al Franken is no longer a senator
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 09:22 PM
Jan 2018

I get it. This board is his fanclub. I'm sure that if there were a DU election between KG and Roy Moore, then the latter would win.

He's out and his replacement will be sworn in tomorrow. I've sent more threads about how wonderful he is and how horrible she is to my trash can. This will be one more.

Let's stop beating a dead horse. This is why we can't have nice things.

still_one

(92,219 posts)
105. She is just fine in NY, but in my view I prefer someone else for President in 2020. She was one of
Wed Jan 3, 2018, 03:11 PM
Jan 2018

the co-sponsers for the "Anti-Boycott Act", which would criminalize constitutionally protected boycotts and certain speech against countries who are allies of the U.S. and would range from sweeping penalties, including criminal prosecution.

After Civil Rights Groups criticized that legislation as an attack on free speech, she withdrew her support for it.

Before she became a Senator she voted to keep critical data needed to track illegal gun traffickers from law enforcement, and protect dealers who sell guns illegally. After she became a Senator she moved to the left on the issue saying she was representing the folks in her district which was her excuse why she originally took that position.

To me, "shooting from the hip" without fully understanding the implications, or the rightness or wrongness of a decision is not a quality I like to see in a President. If those "shifts" in position were based on what Gillibrand thought would give her a political advantage, and were not based on what was right or wrong, that would be even more troubling, and that is not a quality I like to see in a President.

NanceGreggs

(27,815 posts)
34. I am a NY voter ...
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 09:13 PM
Jan 2018

... and I care A LOT that thanks to Gillibrand and the others who called for Franken's resignation, we have lost a great warrior who fought for Democrats everywhere, not just in Minnesota.

Do you really think that NYers only pay attention to what's happening in their own state, and are somehow unaware of what politicians from other states are doing?

brooklynite

(94,595 posts)
75. I am a NY voter...
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 11:16 PM
Jan 2018

...who's linked to a lot of people engaged in politics in NY State; Franken isn't being discussed in political circles.

still_one

(92,219 posts)
106. Perhaps not, but her back and forth positions on the anti-boycott law and gun control sure imply
Wed Jan 3, 2018, 03:16 PM
Jan 2018

that she seems to be more motivated by the political advantage of an issue than by what is right or wrong. Either that, or she doesn't not fully analyze something before making a decision. Either quality is not something I would like to see in a President

Demsrule86

(68,586 posts)
40. I don't agree...and she won't win a primary. She can run for her seat and president too...
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 09:18 PM
Jan 2018

We need her in the Senate. I don't see her as our nominee in 20 but let's get through 18 first.

dflprincess

(28,079 posts)
66. And the people of Minnesota don't care for or about
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 10:46 PM
Jan 2018

a senator from New York who threw our senator under the bus to further her own ambitions and leaves us having to try and hold on to two Senate seats this November.

If she does run in 2020 she might as well skip the primary here (we're going to presidential primary, in 2020 but will caucus for other offices).

Alice11111

(5,730 posts)
27. No, it is not. Read some of the comments in the NYT.
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 09:04 PM
Jan 2018

She fucked over her party...Hillary, Bill, Al.
All of the Dems I know, one a former party leader, want her gone.
Do you think the Clintons will stick their necks out for her again??

Kick her out!

onenote

(42,714 posts)
4. She's running for reelection in 2018 and will win handily
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 07:30 PM
Jan 2018

What she does after that is an open question.

onenote

(42,714 posts)
10. Okay, I'll bite. Who is going to make a credible run at her in 2018
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 07:47 PM
Jan 2018

Keeping in mind that she won in 2012 with over 70 percent of the vote.

Yes, there are folks upset at her for turning her back on Franken. But in the end, it isn't going to make that much difference in her Senate race.

dhol82

(9,353 posts)
13. I will wait and see who her opponents are
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 07:56 PM
Jan 2018

I will wager that there will be more after the shit show she engendered.
She won with 70% because there were no other viable candidates.
Hope she is finally waking up to the colossal mistake she made.
By the way, I am not all that charmed by Schumer either. I think he is a bought and paid for Democrat also.

 

Kirk Lover

(3,608 posts)
25. Why would I have a problem with me asking you that question? Obvi the problems are
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 08:58 PM
Jan 2018

all in your camp.

dhol82

(9,353 posts)
28. Um, you have never had a conversation with a New Yorker?
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 09:10 PM
Jan 2018

Go fuck yourself would often be an acceptable response.

 

Kirk Lover

(3,608 posts)
47. Speak for yourself....and please stop the bullshit sterotype that New Yorkers are rude because
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 09:25 PM
Jan 2018

we most certainly are not. You were defensive and a little nasty with answering my simple question and that is all...you being from NY has nothing to do with it.

dhol82

(9,353 posts)
53. Damn. Talk about sensitive!
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 09:34 PM
Jan 2018

Glad you are from the city.
You should be able to deal with whatever I say.

 

Kirk Lover

(3,608 posts)
56. No worries...I can take it and boy do I dish it...I am awful on twitter...just AWFUL. )
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 09:56 PM
Jan 2018

I'm melting snowflakes one by one. My last name ain't "Trolston" for nuthin'....

onenote

(42,714 posts)
81. There are three republicans vying for the GOP nomination
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 11:22 PM
Jan 2018

and no one has declared that they will run against her in the Democratic primary.

The deadline for filing to run in the primaries is in April and the primary is only two months later. So if someone is thinking about running, they need to get going now, not wait until April.

So you can probably take this to the bank: no one anyone has heard of or electable in a statewide race will file to run against her in the Democratic primary. Not Caroline Kennedy. Not Bill de Blasio. Not Michael Bloomberg.

And the current crop of republican candidates are a collection of jokes. Between them they have $775 in the bank to finance their campaigns. Gillibrand has $8.7 million.

Demsrule86

(68,586 posts)
102. You mean like Zephyr Teachout who couldn't win statewide ever?
Wed Jan 3, 2018, 02:47 PM
Jan 2018

""I have a strong Rockefeller Republican streak," Teachout said. "Wall Street has access to capital and small businesses don’t. " And she ran against Cuomo in the working party/

Demsrule86

(68,586 posts)
101. They won't kick her out. You don't know New york.
Wed Jan 3, 2018, 02:38 PM
Jan 2018

I wish you would stop...no good can come of Bashing Gillibrand.

CK_John

(10,005 posts)
11. Running for reelection and running in 2020 doesn't look very good. Also
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 07:47 PM
Jan 2018

There is several getting ready to run for her seat; at least 5.

onenote

(42,714 posts)
12. So I guess that takes Warren, Klobuchar, and Kaine out of the running too. Among others.
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 07:50 PM
Jan 2018

And it didn't keep Kerry from getting the nomination in 2004, after winning reelection in 2002.

CK_John

(10,005 posts)
18. No the people that may primary are a former head of HUD;
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 08:44 PM
Jan 2018

former Sect of Japan; current Mayor of NY, a former Mayor of NY who may change party and a group to get support for Puerto Rico.

Alice11111

(5,730 posts)
29. I wish Al or Hillary would run. Bloomberg could probably
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 09:10 PM
Jan 2018

beat her as a Dem. I would love to see Hill take over Schumer's job. Hill would not let a lynch mob go wild. Plus, she would whup some Repub arses.

Anyway, my money is on Anyone But Guillibrand.

onenote

(42,714 posts)
71. Schumer may be more popular in NY than Hillary
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 11:12 PM
Jan 2018

In 2016, Schumer's vote total was more than a half million greater than Hillary's. And she was running against a crazy man.

She's not running. Gillibrand will cruise to victory in 2018 and Schumer will do the same in 2022.


onenote

(42,714 posts)
89. bookmarking.
Wed Jan 3, 2018, 12:25 AM
Jan 2018

There is no one with statewide appeal out there even thinking about running against Gillibrand. And it's unlikely that anyone will be taking on Schumer in 2022.

So I'll go with definitely not over "maybe."

onenote

(42,714 posts)
77. And the answer is yes she will and she will win.
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 11:18 PM
Jan 2018

The primary candidates you suggest will keep her from getting the nomination are figments of your imagination

The "former Sect of Japan"? Presumably you mean ambassador -- i.e., Caroline Kennedy.
The current Mayor of NY -- Bill de Blasio
A former Mayor of NY who may change party and a group to get support for Puerto Rico -- Michael Bloomberg

de Blasio (who just was re-elected Mayor, and thus, by your logic, would be hampered if abandoned his post to run for higher office just a few months later) and Bloomberg are popular in NYC, but not nearly that popular statewide. Neither will run against Gillibrand. And Kennedy might have statewide appeal, but she isn't going to run either. You can take it to the bank.
The deadline for filing to be a candidate in the primary is in April and the primary is in June. If one of these folks was seriously considering a run, we'd know about it by now.

brooklynite

(94,595 posts)
79. Care to name any?
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 11:19 PM
Jan 2018

Other than an activist Dentist with no name recognition or cash, no names are being circulated.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
6. DJs Clam Shack.
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 07:35 PM
Jan 2018

Duvall Street in the Keys. Don’t tell them I sent you. Tell them you need to talk to the Lobster Roll.

TheCowsCameHome

(40,168 posts)
16. She'll be lucky to get re-elected.
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 08:09 PM
Jan 2018

I hope Hillary primaries her, actually.

Forget about anything above that.

Alice11111

(5,730 posts)
32. It is not bashing a Dem when this woman has tried to take out
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 09:12 PM
Jan 2018

3 of our most effective Democratic leaders. It is defending the party.

 

Kirk Lover

(3,608 posts)
41. Um yes it is Alice...any bashing of any democrat is frowned upon...perhaps you should
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 09:18 PM
Jan 2018

reacquaint yourself with the rules and TOS. I only know them because I was alerted on over 'bashing' a Dem and I said much much less than you.

Alice11111

(5,730 posts)
64. Well, it wasn't me. Never alerted on anybody yet. Free discussion
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 10:40 PM
Jan 2018

is not bashing, IMO. I would only alert on trolls or Real Bashers.

 

Kirk Lover

(3,608 posts)
73. Oh I don't think it was you! I don't even give it a thought of who it was or wasn't....all I need
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 11:14 PM
Jan 2018

to do is win that appeal baby!!!!!!

 

GaryCnf

(1,399 posts)
55. Well at least you are honest
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 09:37 PM
Jan 2018

Gillebrand is not being attacked for her stand on Franken. THAT is just toeing the party line like dozens of other Democratic senators.

Gillebrand is being attacked for having the audacity to confront one of the "other" Democrats, the one still seen by many here as one of "our most effective leaders" even after his political philosophy has cost us three elections and whose revered status has made our claims of standing with the victims of sexual harassment seem hollow.

Alice11111

(5,730 posts)
58. He was punished, impeached, much more, plus he had affairs
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 10:19 PM
Jan 2018

with consenting adults. The Repubs gunned for him for years, and Hillary. The Repubs are rabid dogs. Newt was parading piously around while he's cheating on his wife, and preaching about Clinton.

I don't condone what he did, but it is over. G needs to be going after the Abuser in Chief, but she doesn't have the courage, so she takes out a Dem, former comedian, really good person, to get him out of her way.

 

GaryCnf

(1,399 posts)
67. Mind you, I don't approve of Gillebrand
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 10:51 PM
Jan 2018

or, for that matter, anyone else, going after Franken because saying that what he has even been accused of doing merits anything more than a short apology makes us look ridiculous to the overwhelming majority of all voters and even a solid majority of a combination of Demcratic and Independent women voters. That being said, they are all doing nothing more than continuing the completely ineffective strategy of trying to attract white female voters by assuming the role of the party of values. She is no worse than the others who cling to the 90's belief that white suburban women hold the key to electoral victory.

Notwithstanding being a non-fan, I have to add that she has gone after Trump every bit as hard as anyone in our party.

As for the apologetics for Bill, anyone who has spent one day litigating civil rights issues knows that neither Lewinski nor Jones are considered "consenting adults" for the purpose of sexual harassment. When we say in one breath that he was punished and in the next that he did nothing wrong (other than to his own family) it should come as no surprise that we have no credibility except when Republicans drop a pedophile or a rapist in our laps.

Alice11111

(5,730 posts)
69. You are making this argument to a civil rights litigator of 30 years,
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 11:05 PM
Jan 2018

mostly sexual harassment. This is one reason I know that what Al did was a comedian's prank, consistent with the "usual workplace banter," in which he worked. Total BS. However, I realize that you aren't taking down Al.

Nonetheless, I agree with part of what you say.
Remember Linda Tripp, recording Lewinsky, for the Repubs, and telling her how to nab Bill Clinton. She was an aggressive consenting adult. He acted in a most disgusting way. That is a closed chapter. He did his time.

 

GaryCnf

(1,399 posts)
80. We're in total agreement re Franken
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 11:20 PM
Jan 2018

Even the photo is nothing . .
oddly enough, hostile environments actually have to be hostile.

As for Bill, you understand and I won't push it anymore. I also agree that, anywhere but a political arena where he still insists on playing, it would indeed be over.

Take care

 

Kirk Lover

(3,608 posts)
38. I personally don't care...I prefer dissent but I just got a
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 09:16 PM
Jan 2018

post removed for less so I was just trying to warn you...someone may alert ! But you have a nice night as I've got a grip that I need to get to getting.

dhol82

(9,353 posts)
45. Um, looks like you might have to revisit what you think is considered bashing
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 09:23 PM
Jan 2018

And what might constitute democratic bashing.
I approve of dissent.

 

Kirk Lover

(3,608 posts)
46. Yes I personally approve of dissent against Dem's if you feel it.....BUT THE FORUM DOES NOT.
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 09:25 PM
Jan 2018

Do you understand that?

dhol82

(9,353 posts)
51. Of course I understand that
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 09:30 PM
Jan 2018

I have disagreed with opinions. Not sure what got your tidy whities in a twist.

Demsrule86

(68,586 posts)
95. I personally feel you should save your 'dissent' for Republicans and am glad that the forum doesn't
Wed Jan 3, 2018, 02:27 PM
Jan 2018

allow it. I well remember lurking and seeing Obama called a 'used car salesmen'.

Demsrule86

(68,586 posts)
103. I am aware of that...I was just making a comment in general not about you.
Wed Jan 3, 2018, 02:50 PM
Jan 2018

I have never understood how some thinks attacking something makes it stronger...it doesn't.

Alice11111

(5,730 posts)
65. If we can't disagree, improve, we won't kick Repub arses.
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 10:44 PM
Jan 2018

We need to figure things out and get better at kicking out Repubs...and stop kicking out Dems, for Repub ramped up BS.

Demsrule86

(68,586 posts)
96. Talking against the party on this forum or any forum discourages voters from joining our party
Wed Jan 3, 2018, 02:30 PM
Jan 2018

or voting for our candidates...turn your attention to the GOP...and we will win...keep harping on the 'faults' of Democrats and continue to lose. Great strategy criticising Democrats, if one's goal is to elect Republicans.

 

Kirk Lover

(3,608 posts)
62. Did I alert on you? That's weird because I'm not an alerter...EVER.
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 10:27 PM
Jan 2018

But I've had 2 posts hidden tonight myself.

LeftInTX

(25,371 posts)
17. I just can't see her getting the 2020 nom.
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 08:33 PM
Jan 2018

If she runs for pres., I don't picture her winning the nomination. This is before and after Franken. I don't think her stance on Al Franken helps or hurts her.

She has done good work in the senate, but so have other senators.

She could do well in the NY presidential primary. If it is early in the election cycle, it could improve her chances.

I just think we will have better, more inspiring candidates in 2020.

dhol82

(9,353 posts)
36. She is not totally beloved in New York
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 09:15 PM
Jan 2018

She has not been a shining light in the senate.
Her attempt at greatness with Franken has been a total destructive force to her campaign.

Alice11111

(5,730 posts)
43. A Repub could win her Senate seat, as many Dems will NOT
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 09:21 PM
Jan 2018

Vote for her again. No Hillary and Bill to prop her up this time. Stabbing other Dems eventually catches up with you.

dhol82

(9,353 posts)
49. She basically started out as a dem masquerading as a Republican or vice versa.
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 09:27 PM
Jan 2018

She was very right wing at the beginning because of the district that she came from in upstate New York.
Not so sure she really shifted from that aside from fake dem front.
She talks the talk but not so sure she walks the walk.
For me, she will have to do a shit load of contrition before she gets my vote again.

dhol82

(9,353 posts)
54. And, of course, if she is the democratic candidate I will vote for her.
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 09:36 PM
Jan 2018

Might not be happy but will swallow my bile and pull the lever.
Or, now, fill in the bubble.

Alice11111

(5,730 posts)
68. She will never get mine.
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 10:55 PM
Jan 2018

...if it is her or Dotard, I will, reluctantly, but I will die to keep her from being our nominee.

Remember Al
and Hillary
and Bill
and Guns
and no due process

Vadem

(2,596 posts)
86. Yes, she joined the Blue Dog Caucus in the House and was
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 11:47 PM
Jan 2018

pro-gun and was for other Blue Dog positions. I don't trust her as a Dem especially after going after Franken. It seems she blows with the political wind.

brooklynite

(94,595 posts)
74. Evidence?
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 11:15 PM
Jan 2018

Cook rates her as SAFE D, and the Democrats have no viable candidate, (Much less someone to run against Gov. Cuomo). Outside of DU, nobody in NY is talking about the Franken story.

onenote

(42,714 posts)
83. which repub. and when do they plan to file their candidacy.
Tue Jan 2, 2018, 11:24 PM
Jan 2018

Gillibarnd has $8.7 million in the bank. The three repubs who have announced have less than a thousand bucks between them.

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
87. Who's going to beat her? Some placeholder Republicon?
Wed Jan 3, 2018, 12:11 AM
Jan 2018

There's very precious little time to make the filing deadline for the primaries, have you heard of anyone looking to primary her? She'll get token opposition in the primary and the general. And numerous people have stayed in the Senate and still run presidential campaigns. Barack Obama is only the latest example.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Will Sen Gillibrand run i...