General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsKeeping drone costs, kill strikes and who's running their operations a secret - a good thing?
Daily Times Monitor
LAHORE: Tensions are quietly increasing between the White House and some congressional leaders over access to sensitive information about the governments use of drones in Pakistan and Yemen, write Adam Entous and Siobhan Gorman in Wall Street Journal, quoting officials.
The White House has brushed aside requests for information from lawmakers, who argue that the strikes, carried out secretly by the Central Intelligence Agency and the militarys Joint Special Operations Command, have broad implications for US policy but dont receive adequate oversight.
Some current and former administration, military and congressional officials point to what they see as significant oversight gaps, in part because few lawmakers have full access to information about the drone strikes. Lawmakers on Congresss intelligence committees are privy to information about all CIA and military intelligence operations, but members of at least two other panels want insight on the drone programme.
----
While few US lawmakers question the effectiveness of the targeted killing campaigns, some top lawmakers complain about what they see as excessive White House secrecy about how targets are chosen and how the administration justified the killings, particularly of American citizens.
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2011%5C12%5C31%5Cstory_31-12-2011_pg7_7?du
####
and in case there's a belief that it's only military or CIA operations running the drone "programs," we learn that the government contracts out killings.
####
WASHINGTON After a U.S. airstrike mistakenly killed at least 15 Afghans in 2010, the Army officer investigating the accident was surprised to discover that an American civilian had played a central role: analyzing video feeds from a Predator drone keeping watch from above.
The contractor had overseen other analysts at Air Force Special Operations Command at Hurlburt Field in Florida as the drone tracked suspected insurgents near a small unit of U.S. soldiers in rugged hills in central Afghanistan. Based partly on her analysis, an Army captain ordered an airstrike on a convoy that turned out to be carrying innocent men, women and children.
"What company do you work for?" Maj. Gen. Timothy McHale demanded of the contractor after he learned that she was not in the military, according to a transcript obtained under the Freedom of Information Act.
----
"Our No. 1 manning problem in the Air Force is manning our unmanned platforms," said Gen. Philip M. Breedlove, Air Force vice chief of staff. Without civilian contractors, U.S. drone operations would grind to a halt.
Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/12/29/134436/contractors-role-grows-in-drone.html#storylink=cpy?du
Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)as someone in a control center and a joystick can kill with little insult to the conscience. Cowardly and sad.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)Robb
(39,665 posts)Or arrows? Bullets? Cruise missiles?
The notion of standoff weapons being "cowardly" is an argument from someone who's never been glad as hell the guy you're shooting at didn't get any closer.
It's swords at dawn, then?
msongs
(67,421 posts)Downwinder
(12,869 posts)or by car? They are both terrorists.
SixthSense
(829 posts)I'd hit the + button on that a thousand times
sad sally
(2,627 posts)We can't end terrorism by using the methods of terrorism to bomb and destroy. Violence in response to violence can only lead to further violence. Jesus taught us that as the soldiers were dragging him away to his death when he said, Those who live by the sword, will die by the sword. Gandhi taught us that when he said, An eye for an eye only makes the whole world blind.
Peace, oh how I long for peace on this Earth we travel on...
Logical
(22,457 posts)they would not need car bombs or people bombs or IEDs.
They use those because that is all they have.
Drones are a (First World) terror-weapon.