General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe DOJ wants to reveal an undocumented teens abortion to an uncle who threatened to beat her.
As Americans were preparing to ring in the new year over the weekend, the Trump administration fired a new retaliatory salvo in its war against undocumented teenagers who seek lawful abortions in contravention of the governments wishes. In November, the Department of Justice asked the Supreme Court to sanction the ACLU attorneys who secured one minors right to abortion access, an unscrupulous act of attempted retribution. Now the DOJ wants to punish a minor by revealing her private medical information to an uncle who threatened to beat her if she terminated her pregnancy.
Justice Department attorneys launched their latest offensive in response to yet another judicial rout of the administration policy that attempts to bar undocumented minors from getting abortions, even in the case of rape. On Dec. 18, 2017, U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan ordered the Trump administration to allow two more undocumented teenagers in federal custody, known as Jane Poe and Jane Roe, to obtain abortions. She also prohibited the government from divulging information about their pregnancies or abortions to anyone. Both women promptly underwent the procedure, according to an ACLU court filing. Then, on Thursday, the ACLU asked Chutkan to extend her restraining order by continuing to bar the government from disclosing Poe and Roes abortion statuses.
This request was quite reasonable, as Poe and Roe have a constitutional right to privacy in their medical information. But the Justice Department decided to oppose the ACLUs motion for two reasons. First, the DOJ argued that Roe does not deserve privacy protections because she is 19 and therefore subject to a different set of rules from undocumented minors. (Roe says she is 17 and was initially treated like a minor, but the government located a birth certificate indicating that she is actually two years older.) Second, with regard to Poewho is indisputably 17the government demanded the ability to disclose her abortion information to medical providers in order to vet potential sponsors.
The government does not persuasively explain why it might need to disclose Poes abortion status to her doctors instead of simply letting her do it. But whats more disturbing is the notion that Trump administration officials would want (or need) to tell Poes possible sponsors about her procedure. A sponsor, typically a family member, houses an undocumented minor until she reaches the age of majority, acquires lawful status, or gets deported. Poes most likely sponsor is her unclewho told Poe that he would beat her if she terminated her pregnancy. The government requests the authority to inform Poes uncleas well as her parents, who made the same threatthat she went through with the abortion.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2018/01/the_trump_doj_tried_to_reveal_an_undocumented_teen_s_abortion_to_an_uncle.html?wpsrc=sh_all_dt_tw_top
shenmue
(38,506 posts)dhol82
(9,353 posts)Eliot Rosewater
(31,112 posts)CaliforniaPeggy
(149,627 posts)I am livid.
How do we stop them?
GoCubsGo
(32,086 posts)May these people meet the same fate. (Those in the DOJ, not the victims.)
Solly Mack
(90,769 posts)It's not as if so-called "pro-lifers" are against women dying. They aren't.
If they can't control women then they want to punish them.