General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFire and Fury: President of Macmillan Responds in Memo to Trump's Cease and Desist Demand
?1515439236Macmillan Publishers and their President, John Sargent, responded to the Trump administrations demand they "immediately cease and desist from any further publication, release or dissemination" of Michael Wolffs bestselling book, Fire and Fury. In the memo to employees, Mr. Sargent succinctly lays out the constitutional basis for Macmillans refusal to comply with this clearly fascist attempt to stifle the free press, and makes it clear this is about much more than just this one book.
Below is Sargents full letter:
To: All Macmillan Employees
From: John Sargent
Last Thursday, shortly after 7:00 a.m., we received a demand from the President of the United States to immediately cease and desist from any further publication, release or dissemination of Michael Wolffs Fire and Fury. On Thursday afternoon we responded with a short statement saying that we would publish the book, and we moved the pub date forward to the next day. Later today we will send our legal response to President Trump.
Our response is firm, as it has to be. I am writing you today to explain why this is a matter of great importance. It is about much more than Fire and Fury.
The president is free to call news fake and to blast the media. That goes against convention, but it is not unconstitutional. But a demand to cease and desist publicationa clear effort by the President of the United States to intimidate a publisher into halting publication of an important book on the workings of the governmentis an attempt to achieve what is called prior restraint. That is something that no American court would order as it is flagrantly unconstitutional.
This is very clearly defined in Supreme Court case law, most prominently in the Pentagon Papers case. As Justice Hugo Black explained in his concurrence:
Both the history and language of the First Amendment support the view that the press must be left free to publish news, whatever the source, without censorship, injunctions, or prior restraints. In the First Amendment, the Founding Fathers gave the free press the protection it must have to fulfill its essential role in our democracy. The press was to serve the governed, not the governors. The Governments power to censor the press was abolished so that the press would remain forever free to censure the Government.
Then there is Justice William Brennans opinion in The New York Times Co. v. Sullivan:
Thus we consider this case against the background of a profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials.
And finally Chief Justice Warren Burger in another landmark case:
The thread running through all these cases is that prior restraints on speech and publication are the most serious and least tolerable infringement on First Amendment rights.
There is no ambiguity here. This is an underlying principle of our democracy. We cannot stand silent. We will not allow any president to achieve by intimidation what our Constitution precludes him or her from achieving in court. We need to respond strongly for Michael Wolff and his book, but also for all authors and all their books, now and in the future. And as citizens we must demand that President Trump understand and abide by the First Amendment of our Constitution.
This is what patriotism looks like.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/1/8/1730845/-Fire-and-Fury-President-of-Macmillan-Responds-in-Memo-to-Trump-s-Cease-and-Desist-Demand
https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2018/01/08/us/ap-us-trump-book-publisher-letter.html
malaise
(269,157 posts)NOW
Ferrets are Cool
(21,109 posts)tried this chit?".
The three separate branches of government have utterly failed us.
calimary
(81,443 posts)How would they behave if President Obama did this? How would they act if a President Hillary Clinton did that?
colorado_ufo
(5,737 posts)Iahotdog
(119 posts)calimary
(81,443 posts)Well, just today, Dianne Feinstein did it! She defied that whiny asshole Chuck Grassley and released the transcript of Fusion GPS testimony which he'd already indicated he would, but has since balked and stonewalled and gone back on his word (to a constituent back home at a town hall meeting - who asked him to do so, point blank).
On edit - wanted to add link:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100210078801
Iahotdog
(119 posts)We been trying to get rid of him for years.
calimary
(81,443 posts)Dianne-the-Defiant Feinstein is one of mine. MAN-oh-MAN did she make me proud today (releasing that Fusion GPS transcript despite the stonewalling and obstruction and lying to constituents and other assorted bullshit foot dragging of Herr Chairman).
Just VOTE! Thats the only guaranteed remedy for the Too-Many-republiCONS disease. Make sure everyone you know understands how critical it is to vote! And if we still cant get rid of him, then lets hope we can flip the Senate. Then hell be reduced to ranking member status (which sounds pretty good but has NO power).
BumRushDaShow
(129,401 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Knowing full well what he was up against and how litigious Trump is.
BumRushDaShow
(129,401 posts)there have been "scandalous" books published for ages - notably Kitty Kelley tomes (usually called "unauthorized biographies" ) that I mentioned in a different thread, and not a one has ever been "banned" or dropped from publication if the subject of the book whined about it.
This one got the $2 million lawsuit from Sinatra, and he eventually dropped it -
Most of the rest of the subjects of her books like the BFEE & Nancy Reagan, pretty much dismissed/ignored the books.
Libel is very hard to prove due to the "malice" test. Carol Burnett was one of the rare ones to prevail against the National Enquirer for it.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)ProudProgressiveNow
(6,129 posts)spanone
(135,866 posts)uppityperson
(115,678 posts)SCantiGOP
(13,873 posts)And you have lost your liberty and your democracy.
longship
(40,416 posts)There you go! It's in that oath which is explicitly given within said constitution. Either one abides by that oath, or one has no business in the office for which the oath was taken. It is really that simple.
R&
MyOwnPeace
(16,937 posts)that more people would be upset about this action - not just the details and information exposed in the book.
The PRESIDENT of the UNITED STATES, who took an oath to protect the Constitution, initiates an action that goes against the First Amendment of that very Constitution! That is the action of an enemy of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!
IMPEACH NOW!
spooky3
(34,469 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)He knows even more words than Trump!
(Trump recently said, "I'm smart. I know a lot of words." or something to that effect.)
3catwoman3
(24,035 posts)"I know words. I have the best words."
"I know words." Not very many. And what the hell does this statement even mean?
"I have the best words." No, you don't. A recent analysis of his word usage ranks him at about a 4th grade level. I was surprised it was that high.
Somehow, during the campaign, my husband missed that inane "I know words," statement. He finally heard it a few days ago and shook his head in disbelief.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)He sounded like an idiot, like a little kid.
3catwoman3
(24,035 posts)...because he IS an idiot.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Grammy23
(5,811 posts)Reading this memo to Duffus and explaining to him what the big words mean. Just once, I want to see the look on that fat bastards face when he gets told NO....you cant do that. No court in the land will back you up. With any luck, his head will swell up like a balloon and his wig hat will fly off. Id pay money to see that.
mnhtnbb
(31,402 posts)would be for the giant sack of orange $hit to literally explode.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Chief Executive Officer
Macmillan
John Sargent is the CEO of Macmillan; the global trade division of the Verlagsgruppe Georg von Holtzbrinck based in Stuttgart, Germany. Macmillan Publishers has major trade publishing operations in the US, the UK, Australia and Germany with smaller operations in South Africa, India and China.
Previously John ran the US operations of Holtzbrinck, including all the trade companies, the Macmillan Higher Education group, St. Martins Scholarly and Reference, Hanley & Belfus medical publishers and Scientific American. He started at Holtzbrinck as CEO of St. Martins Press.
Prior to that he had been the CEO of Dorling Kindersley Inc. and the President of the Childrens Book Division of Simon & Schuster. He serves on the executive board of the Association of American Publishers. He has been on the executive committee of Graham Windham, a New York foster care agency for over 20 years including four years as its Chairman.
John received a B.A. in Economics from Stanford and an M.B.A. in Finance from Columbia. John lives in Brooklyn with his wife Connie and their two children.
http://publishers.org/about/john-sargent
He lives in Brooklyn...kinda cool.
area51
(11,920 posts)3catwoman3
(24,035 posts)2 Scoops does not know the meaing of "rise above."
Before the stolen election (the 3rd one, in case we are counting), I said, several times, that he would never be able to do the job because he would be spending all his time responding to every little thing said about him that was not 100% worshipful and adoring.
He is so thin-skinned that he makes the rice paper scene in the iconic opening footage of Kung Fu look like steel.
orangecrush
(19,616 posts)Takket
(21,620 posts)"Oh and by the way, mister president? FUUUUUUUUUUUUCK YOUUUUUUU!!!!!!!"
ProudMNDemocrat
(16,788 posts)devoted the entire hour to Michael Wolff and the discussion of the book, FIRE and FURY. Two comments stood out...."1,000,000 copies SOLD!" "Bookstores ran out of the book! "
That means that there could be more printings of the book! A Best Seller for sure and one of the more important books this year.
onetexan
(13,057 posts)John Sargent has integrity. Idiot 45 and his ilk do not.
SunSeeker
(51,665 posts)Lifelong Protester
(8,421 posts)Dem_4_Life
(1,765 posts)Gothmog
(145,501 posts)brewens
(13,618 posts)reload. I'm sure lots of people still want it.
DiverDave
(4,886 posts)Great response to, clearly, an illegal order.
I am so fed up with those goddamned fascists.