General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTillerson and Mattis are reportedly trying to hold Trump back from striking North Korea
Tillerson and Mattis are reportedly trying to hold Trump back from striking North KoreaAlex Lockie Business Insider
President Donald Trump's secretaries of state and defense are trying to persuade him not to strike North Korea, while his national security adviser is pushing for a "bloody nose" attack, according to recent reports in The Telegraph and The Wall Street Journal.
Rex Tillerson, the secretary of state, has reportedly been key in pushing for peace, but he may be on his way out.
A US strike would mean it implicitly trusts that North Korea's leader, Kim Jong Un, wouldn't escalate it into an all-out war that could kill millions.
The Trump administration is debating a "bloody nose" attack on North Korea, recent reports say, with the president's inner circle split and apparently teetering between endorsing a strike and holding out hope for diplomacy.
The bloody-nose strategy, which calls for a sharp, violent response to some North Korean provocation, puts a lot of weight on the US's properly calibrating an attack on North Korea and Pyongyang's reading the limited strike as anything other than the opening salvo of an all-out war.
http://www.businessinsider.com/tillerson-mattis-trump-north-korea-strike-2018-1
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)This guy is out of his mind.
spanone
(135,866 posts)SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)wants to prove how tough he is by killing millions on the Korean peninsula and probably lots of Japanese as well.
What could possibly go wrong?
regnaD kciN
(26,045 posts)Leaving aside the South Koreans and Japanese (because Trump obviously doesn't care about non-white people), or the fact that such a war would result in the deaths of thousands of U.S. service personnel stationed there (because Trump obviously doesn't care about those "losers" who didn't have a rich daddy to keep them out of combat), such an attack would still be a massive gamble that NK hasn't actually miniaturized nukes, built a whole bunch of them, and mounted them on ICBMs. Now, probably they haven't yet -- but we won't know for certain unless we carry out our "limited" attack and wait to see whether or not the 5-10 incoming nuclear missiles show up on the radar screens. Do we feel lucky?
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)So Fuhrer Dump and his traitor party would count a strike there as a bonus, no doubt.
steve2470
(37,457 posts)They will attack South Korea and Japan, and attempt to attack us also.
ProudMNDemocrat
(16,788 posts)and expect no one to get killed. This is folly!
If Trump calls for an attack on North Korea, kiss the future, the environment, our Democracy goodbye. The blood of millions in South Korea, Japan, N. Korea, and elsewhere will hang in the balance because of one man's preoccupation with the size of his "NUCLEAR BUTTON".
Don't expect Russia and China to sit back and allow N. Korea to take it. This would be the start of WWIII, but with greater consequences. The United States would have no allies to support us.
regnaD kciN
(26,045 posts)I would thoroughly expect Putin to sit back, declare "neutrality," and watch in satisfaction as his two global rivals destroy each other, making him the Czar of the unquestioned sole remaining superpower in the world.
bullwinkle428
(20,630 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Vladimir Putin, it might have happened.
Irish_Dem
(47,342 posts)But I don't think these countries had nuclear weapons at the ready.
Locrian
(4,522 posts)Yeah - he's the "gate keeper" but the fact that there is a "debate" is insane! Who are the other lunatics goading him on?