General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRasmussen Poll: Oprah 48%-Trump 38%
Rasmussen polls, a right wing, Republican leaning polling organization, has just released the first poll matching Oprah Winfrey against President* Donald Trump.
<snip>The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 48% of Likely U.S. Voters would opt for Winfrey, while 38% would choose Trump. But a sizable 14% are undecided.
Winfrey has the support of 76% of Democrats, 22% of Republicans and 44% of voters not affiliated with either major political party. The president earns 66% of the vote from Republicans, 12% of Democrats and 38% of unaffiliateds.<snip>
Link;
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/january_2018/oprah_vs_the_donald_and_the_winner_is
Roland99
(53,342 posts)PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)itcfish
(1,828 posts)Wasting their time with this nonsense???
dawg
(10,624 posts)They're going to *love* President Harris.
louis c
(8,652 posts)Eyeball_Kid
(7,434 posts)No offense to Oprah intended. She's NOT a politician. She has no experience in public service. Her heart seems always to be in the right place, but that's a far cry from being an executive in the public trust who has experience and knowledge of the workings of government. As a surrogate, Oprah would be superb. But she needs to do what she's good at.
chowder66
(9,075 posts)louis c
(8,652 posts)...as long as he's out of office as soon as possible.
If we had to put every registered voter who was born in this country, 35 years old or more, except Trump, into a drum and pull out the name at random, and swear him or her in immediately as President, I'd go along with it.
riversedge
(70,288 posts)running, but I am warming to the idea.
Bradshaw3
(7,527 posts)louis c
(8,652 posts)we can put up a less than perfect candidate who is very popular, and win.
In this case, I don't care what it takes, we have to win.
Bradshaw3
(7,527 posts)Which of course they did with Obama just five short years ago. Funny, people have already forgotten that and are grasping at a Dem version of celeb worship as the only path to winning. This idea that we have to go with "anybody" no matter what is giving up on democracy and the path to Idiocracy. And the description of a "less than perfect candidate" I guess is a description of Oprah, who is far less than perfect.
louis c
(8,652 posts)"Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public" Quote attributed to H.L. Mencken
Actual Mencken quote;
No one in this world, so far as I know and I have searched the records for years, and employed agents to help me has ever lost money by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of the plain people. Nor has anyone ever lost public office thereby.
Link:
http://www.thisdayinquotes.com/2011/09/no-one-ever-went-broke-underestimating.html
In this day and age, popular may be more important than qualified.
Bradshaw3
(7,527 posts)This day and age? Obama won five years ago! And Dems are poised to win big in 2018. We don't need someone who is not qualified and has shown questionable judgment in many ways. Just because some are in love with her, doesn't mean she is an automatic winner. Hillary lost for a lot of reasons that need to be addressed, not turn to desperation as if 2016 shows all is lost without some celebrity savior being looked to as some did with trump.
If we want to question voter's intelligence, then supporting a Dem candidate based on celeb worship is as dumb as any trump voter voting for a tv star. It's not just wrong, it is unnecessary because we can win without doing it and it takes our country down a path we need to reverse, not continue on.
mythology
(9,527 posts)And there is no poll taken this far out that is meaningful.
demosincebirth
(12,542 posts)L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)Trump's next job, National Anthem Performer at sporting events, begins with the Fall T-V season ...
stonecutter357
(12,697 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Some will actually make something of this. The response to a solid speech has been beyond laughable.
Jarqui
(10,130 posts)Misogyny and racism are still big factors.
If I had to chose between Trump and a piece of shit, I'd vote for the piece of shit because beyond stinking like Trump, it wouldn't do any harm.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Bayard
(22,128 posts)From a President Winfrey? Yeah, that's the ticket!
But seriously folks-----No. No more amateurs.
moonscape
(4,673 posts)Freethinker65
(10,036 posts)DrunkInTheAfternoon
(30 posts)I would've thought it would be much larger than that.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)If Trump is actually the candidate in 2020, you can bet he'll beat his approval rating. And Oprah is a Black woman in a white supremacist, patriarchal society. So, 48-38 is a little disappointing, perhaps, but I don't find it surprising.
Oprah is also a wealthy celebrity, which is going to bother a lot of anti-Trump folks. Oprah has no business running for POTUS, of course. But neither did Trump.
My bet is Kamala Harris will be our candidate, and I'm hoping she can top 50%.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)Cha
(297,574 posts)bearsfootball516
(6,377 posts)1. She's not qualified and
2. She pretty much shut down those rumors
http://www.etonline.com/everything-oprah-winfrey-has-said-about-not-running-president-93854
Tarheel_Dem
(31,239 posts)she did, this early chatter is intended to bloody her up well before she'd make the decision. It's clear someone feels threatened by her, and the media loves a celebrity fight to fill up the many hours of the 24/7 media beast.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)38% is probably his floor.