Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMemo to those a bit slow on the uptake.
Telling people they should not spend money on business X because of Y (as long as Y is a true fact) is not, I repeat not an infringement on anyone's freedom.
Got it?
Good.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1288 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Memo to those a bit slow on the uptake. (Original Post)
2ndAmForComputers
Jul 2012
OP
Trajan
(19,089 posts)1. Got it ..
Good ...
DontTreadOnMe
(2,442 posts)2. Hitting a business in the wallet is VERY EFFECTIVE
Don't fuck with consumers!
2ndAmForComputers
(3,527 posts)3. And completely democratic. With a lowercase D.
You can truly get the Will of the People with this.
(It's a fact that sometimes, just sometimes, the Will of the People truly sucks. But it's a price we have to pay.)
Tsiyu
(18,186 posts)4. No more than a business is infringing
when they choose to hire one person over another.
We consumers can choose whom we hire using our own personal criteria.