Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

abelenkpe

(9,933 posts)
Tue Jul 24, 2012, 12:09 PM Jul 2012

Why do visual effects costs so much?

Why do visual effects costs so much?
http://effectscorner.blogspot.com/2012/07/why-do-visual-effects-costs-so-much.html

(snip)

Short version: Visual Effects is incredibly time consuming and labor intensive work done for very little profit. In some cases it may actually cost less for the studio than the real costs incurred. Changes and compressed schedules  increase the costs further.

Full version:
Visual effects is a very competitive market worldwide. There are a lot of visual effects companies and all of them eager to get work so competition alone does not allow any company to have huge mark-ups.

The visual effects industry suffers from tax incentives in other states and countries. Some as much as 40% off. Note that these figures are not reduction of taxes but actually funds applied directly or indirectly to a movie. That means it’s not a level completive field and any visual effects company in California has to drop their prices if they wish to compete with other companies on the basis of price. Many visual effects companies actually underbid the work when required to try to keep money coming in. This means in some cases it’s costing the studio less than it actually costs. Same thing with the tax incentives. In those cases the local tax payers are in fact helping to fund the movie and thereby lower the studios expense for the visual effects.

(snip)

If visual effects were really such a profit center the studios and investors would be breaking down the door to buy or create their own visual effects companies. Some studios have had their own visual effects departments in the past. Disney had Secret Lab and Image Movers at different times. They closed both. The only major studio currently with a visual effects component is Sony with their Sony Imageworks. Sony had moved a number of jobs to Albuquerque, New Mexico a few years ago in an attempt to get in on the New Mexico tax incentives. They’ve now closed that and are moving many jobs to Vancouver for the tax incentives there. There may be a future where all visual effects for Hollywood based movies are all done out of this country simply due to tax incentives. This is the outsourcing that isn’t talked about.

(more at link)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Highly lucrative films like the Avengers and Batman have hundreds of visual effects artists working on them, many who work insane hours with few benefits and don't even get credit.



9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
1. One single frame can cost a million dollars or more...
Tue Jul 24, 2012, 12:13 PM
Jul 2012

...in intense composite scenes.

It can be like making 50 or more films simultaneously.

 

villager

(26,001 posts)
4. ...and almost all films (not even those perceived as "effects-driven") rely on them
Tue Jul 24, 2012, 12:23 PM
Jul 2012

now...

IATSE is making attempts to organize VFX workers, but that won't necessarily change any of this, either, given the outsourcing possibilities, etc...

abelenkpe

(9,933 posts)
5. Wish they had tried that ten years ago
Tue Jul 24, 2012, 12:38 PM
Jul 2012

It may have made a difference. But then maybe not. Many non union workers complain about the work hours, lack of credits and ever decreasing benefits but are afraid that organizing won't solve those problems given that union workers also work insane hours and have seen benefits reduced. (They do seem to get credit though)

You're right that it is impossible to compete with the tax incentives offered by other nations. Why can't our elected officials do anything to stop other countries from luring jobs away?

abelenkpe

(9,933 posts)
6. Visual effects are star
Tue Jul 24, 2012, 12:42 PM
Jul 2012

They are a large part of the most lucrative films. But the workers who create them have seen their benefits reduced, their pay stagnate, increasingly get no credit and are powerless to stop their jobs from disappearing from the US altogether vs movie stars who get top billing, residuals and great pay.



 

gadgets505

(15 posts)
8. NM REPUG GOV DUMPS ON FILM BIZ
Tue Jul 24, 2012, 01:20 PM
Jul 2012

After a decade and a half of work by, first moderate (R) Gov Gary Johnson and, then (D) Gov Bill Richardson to bring film business to New Mexico, and having done so very successfully, one of the high priority attacks from our new Repug Gov Martinez was to dump the lefty liberal Hollywood biz outta town. She's been quite effective in her purge, as Sony NM Digital closed down one of the largest visual effects shops in the world here in Albuquerque last month in response to her attacks on film biz incentives. Over one hundred highly paid (and tax-paying) employees have now relocated mostly back to Culver City, and local support businesses are feeling the pinch as well.

Live film production is down as well while Hollywood scatters away from what has become a clearly hostile atmosphere. What a shame, because a lot of talented people moved here and are now leaving, and a lot of locals became trained in the various trades specific to film production and are now having to sign up for unemployment.

Thank god for those Republican job creators...

 

villager

(26,001 posts)
9. With these rightwing Govs., prosecuting the "culture war" comes first...
Tue Jul 24, 2012, 03:12 PM
Jul 2012

Jobs, sanity, or anything else be damned...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why do visual effects cos...