General Discussion

question everything

(47,487 posts) Sun Jan 21, 2018, 08:57 PM Jan 2018

Just curious: if that stormy woman was paid to keep quiet, how come she is

talking now?

Can they go after her?

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Just curious: if that stormy woman was paid to keep quiet, how come she is (Original Post) question everything Jan 2018 OP

Maybe because the hush money was paid when the pussifier was running for President rustydog Jan 2018 #1

It's an old interview that InTouch didn't publish when they should malaise Jan 2018 #3

No because apparently the fools didn't know that she did this interview with In Touch years ago malaise Jan 2018 #2

Oh, how he wished he could still tell everyone: you are fired! (nt) question everything Jan 2018 #4

Imagine paying all that money and someone has had the good on yah malaise Jan 2018 #9

He's done worse since, out in the open. What's the point? They've stopped paying, right? LuvLoogie Jan 2018 #5

A lawsuit would involve admitting he paid her off. It would make Trump look even worse. Doodley Jan 2018 #6

Read the article - he tried to shut up malaise Jan 2018 #10

Can't shut up a Cajun! Lol! We don't buy into Trumpworld crap! Kajun Gal Jan 2018 #7

How dare you call me "generic"! ProudLib72 Jan 2018 #8

rustydog

(9,186 posts)

1. Maybe because the hush money was paid when the pussifier was running for President

Reply to question everything (Original post)

Sun Jan 21, 2018, 08:59 PM

Jan 2018

If the money was campaign funds paid to keep her silent, there may be an issue there.
I am just guessing though.

malaise

(269,054 posts)

3. It's an old interview that InTouch didn't publish when they should

Reply to rustydog (Reply #1)

Sun Jan 21, 2018, 09:04 PM

Jan 2018

have done so.

malaise

(269,054 posts)

2. No because apparently the fools didn't know that she did this interview with In Touch years ago

Reply to question everything (Original post)

Sun Jan 21, 2018, 09:02 PM

Jan 2018

But In Touch had already spoken to Clifford in 2011. With the publication of the interview this week, there has been intense interest in why the tabloid did not publish their interview in 2011. The Associated Press reported Friday that Trump’s personal lawyer had threatened to sue the tabloid if they published the interview, according to four sources who used to work for In Touch. The sources could not speak on the record because they were not authorized to discuss In Touch’s editorial policies. Neither Trump nor his lawyer have responded to CNN’s requests for comment.

http://wtvr.com/2018/01/20/in-touch-stormy-daniels-interview/

question everything

(47,487 posts)

4. Oh, how he wished he could still tell everyone: you are fired! (nt)

Reply to malaise (Reply #2)

Sun Jan 21, 2018, 09:04 PM

Jan 2018

malaise

(269,054 posts)

9. Imagine paying all that money and someone has had the good on yah

Reply to question everything (Reply #4)

Sun Jan 21, 2018, 09:16 PM

Jan 2018

for years.

LuvLoogie

(7,011 posts)

5. He's done worse since, out in the open. What's the point? They've stopped paying, right?

Reply to question everything (Original post)

Sun Jan 21, 2018, 09:05 PM

Jan 2018

Doodley

(9,094 posts)

6. A lawsuit would involve admitting he paid her off. It would make Trump look even worse.

Reply to question everything (Original post)

Sun Jan 21, 2018, 09:08 PM

Jan 2018

malaise

(269,054 posts)

10. Read the article - he tried to shut up

Reply to Doodley (Reply #6)

Sun Jan 21, 2018, 09:21 PM

Jan 2018

In Touch!

Kajun Gal

(1,907 posts)

7. Can't shut up a Cajun! Lol! We don't buy into Trumpworld crap!

Reply to question everything (Original post)

Sun Jan 21, 2018, 09:10 PM

Jan 2018

ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)

8. How dare you call me "generic"!

Reply to question everything (Original post)

Sun Jan 21, 2018, 09:12 PM

Jan 2018

I'm the bigliest ever! It was you who was "generic", you are no good at sex! I'm going to tell the whole world just after I sue you for telling the whole world.

Reply to this discussion