Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

orangecrush

(19,572 posts)
Mon Jan 22, 2018, 11:58 AM Jan 2018

How the Trump-Russia Data Machine Games Google to Fool Americans


How The SEOsage Is Made

First: Create content that subtly masks the truth.
Second: Shape that content into something people will share.
Third: Make it identical, and make a ton of it.
Fourth: Flood the internet with that content.
Fifth: Flood the internet with that content.
Six: Flood the fucking internet with that content.

The Google algorithm orders its search results, among other ways, by popular keywords used, publish date, and how many other links point to your site. You can do things to max out your keyword SEO, like I did in my last job, but the results we’re seeing here, their consistency, the thoroughness of their victory, and the standardization of the messaging all requires a well-funded, well-coordinated effort. Ask any digital marketing expert: This is an organization of writers and data geeks who are paid handsomely to spend all day churning out content, pointing readers from one site to another, and using social media bots as vectors to beam this misinformation out to micro-targeted demographics.

It’s a truly amazing operation. Time Magazine did an outstanding piece of reporting on this quite recently. So did The Guardian, here. Those pieces will scare the shit out of you. If they don’t, I’m afraid you’re an unwitting casualty of this war.

Why aren’t Democrats paying people to do this kind of thing with the truth? No idea. None. They can do it, just like that other company crushed us, but they haven’t learned.

How it works? Begin with some research. Find out which keywords people are using most frequently to dig up the kinds of stories you want to warp and feed them. Words like evidence; Trump; collusion; Comey; Clapper; Yates; Russia; etc. Then create an alternate narrative that deflects from the mainstream news and that can work independently of time: One you can bring back whenever you need it. Some examples: Benghazi; emails; Butobama.

Now, importantly, we need to make it highly shareable. Why do people tell other people things? Because they want to inform them, meaning ultimately they want to feel and look smart. You can flatter people into thinking they’re smart by offering “new” information that “the other side” is hiding or not covering at all. You can flatter them into ignorance in the name of independence, flatter them into stupidity in the name of being smart.


https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.pastemagazine.com/articles/2017/06/how-the-trump-russia-data-machine-games-google-to.html


Much, much more at the link.










8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How the Trump-Russia Data Machine Games Google to Fool Americans (Original Post) orangecrush Jan 2018 OP
Kick dalton99a Jan 2018 #1
an example orangecrush Jan 2018 #2
Article is from June. Any recent updates or context to add? (nt) FreepFryer Jan 2018 #3
not relevant, eh? orangecrush Jan 2018 #4
Those two links are identical. Just wondering what the 'value add' for your OP was FreepFryer Jan 2018 #5
sorry orangecrush Jan 2018 #6
K&R Scurrilous Jan 2018 #7
Thanks! orangecrush Jan 2018 #8

orangecrush

(19,572 posts)
2. an example
Mon Jan 22, 2018, 12:05 PM
Jan 2018

of how they use this, from the link...

"Let’s ignore the criminal level of stupidity for a minute. Look instead at the dates on those articles. May 16 and 17 of this year. This year. The Bin Laden raid, again, was six fucking years ago. What’s happening here? Why are all these different white nationalist news sites suddenly writing about this together? Why did they start doing it on May 16? Why do those articles even exist?

Well, on May 15, you might remember, The Washington Post broke this little gem: President Trump shared top secret intel with the Russian Foreign Minister and Russian Ambassador. In the Oval Office. In front of Russian state media.

Whoops-a-daisy!

The right-wing bullshit factory lurched to life. These outlets launched a broad “what about?” attack, a coordinated attack, on Obama and the left. That bullshit story about Obama’s “dangerous” classified “leak” suddenly broke throughout the right-wing media sphere. Some of these articles are even cut-and-paste jobs. There’s no effort here, just content. Tons of content, made quickly, made together, all spewing the same lies, but optimized."

FreepFryer

(7,077 posts)
5. Those two links are identical. Just wondering what the 'value add' for your OP was
Mon Jan 22, 2018, 02:31 PM
Jan 2018

Beyond just excerpting and linking to an article from June, adding a little of your own thought process goes a long way to communicating the idea that led you to post the link.

orangecrush

(19,572 posts)
6. sorry
Mon Jan 22, 2018, 03:10 PM
Jan 2018

hadn't had my covfefe yet!
This was supposed to be the other link...

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100210128512


and I felt the article might help others who, like myself, are bewildered at finding credible news sources buried in avalanches of right wing bullshit.

Also interesting to me in light of the Russian bots and trolls coming to the aid of Nunes and the #releasethememo hashtag.


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How the Trump-Russia Data...