Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCurious about all of these rumblings casting the FBI in a bad light?
Your guide to the anti-FBI conspiracy theories rippling through conservative media
January 25, 2018 ----The following article by Philip Bump was posted on the Washington Post website January 24, 2018.
https://www.dfl3cd.org/your-guide-to-the-anti-fbi-conspiracy-theories-rippling-through-conservative-media/
There was a window of about a week at the end of 2016 when the FBI and its then-director, James B. Comey, were two of Donald Trumps favorite things in the world. From the moment news broke that the bureau was investigating new emails related to Hillary Clintons private email server, Trump celebrated the FBI and its investigation on as many occasions as possible.
After the election, that relationship soured. With news reports that there was an active investigation into Russian efforts to swing the campaign to Trump and, subsequently, that there was an investigation into Trumps campaign itself (an investigation confirmed by Comey in early 2017), Trump lashed out at U.S. intelligence agencies.
In March, Trump publicly accused intelligence agencies of having wiretapped Trump Tower before the election, an accusation that was quickly revealed to be both baseless and untrue. Unlike Trumps fuming about the then-still-nebulous investigation into meddling, though, the response to Trumps wiretapping accusation from his allies was to try to defend it regardless of how challenging it was to defend.
Former White House chief of staff Reince Priebus knew the staff would have to fall into line to prove the tweet correct, the opposite of the usual process of vetting proposed pronouncements, Howard Kurtz writes in his new book about the Trump administration. Outside the White House, the response was similar, with allies including Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) working to prove, if not that Trump Tower was wiretapped, at least that Trump was the focus of an unfair, politically motivated investigation initiated by the Obama administration. The focus of the wiretapping charge evolved into the Obama administration having de-anonymized the identities of Trump allies in surveillance reports, an act that Trump eventually called the real story.
....................
January 25, 2018 ----The following article by Philip Bump was posted on the Washington Post website January 24, 2018.
https://www.dfl3cd.org/your-guide-to-the-anti-fbi-conspiracy-theories-rippling-through-conservative-media/
There was a window of about a week at the end of 2016 when the FBI and its then-director, James B. Comey, were two of Donald Trumps favorite things in the world. From the moment news broke that the bureau was investigating new emails related to Hillary Clintons private email server, Trump celebrated the FBI and its investigation on as many occasions as possible.
After the election, that relationship soured. With news reports that there was an active investigation into Russian efforts to swing the campaign to Trump and, subsequently, that there was an investigation into Trumps campaign itself (an investigation confirmed by Comey in early 2017), Trump lashed out at U.S. intelligence agencies.
In March, Trump publicly accused intelligence agencies of having wiretapped Trump Tower before the election, an accusation that was quickly revealed to be both baseless and untrue. Unlike Trumps fuming about the then-still-nebulous investigation into meddling, though, the response to Trumps wiretapping accusation from his allies was to try to defend it regardless of how challenging it was to defend.
Former White House chief of staff Reince Priebus knew the staff would have to fall into line to prove the tweet correct, the opposite of the usual process of vetting proposed pronouncements, Howard Kurtz writes in his new book about the Trump administration. Outside the White House, the response was similar, with allies including Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) working to prove, if not that Trump Tower was wiretapped, at least that Trump was the focus of an unfair, politically motivated investigation initiated by the Obama administration. The focus of the wiretapping charge evolved into the Obama administration having de-anonymized the identities of Trump allies in surveillance reports, an act that Trump eventually called the real story.
....................
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 833 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (13)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Curious about all of these rumblings casting the FBI in a bad light? (Original Post)
L. Coyote
Jan 2018
OP
icymist
(15,888 posts)1. K & R
L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)2. Anatomy of a (debunked) conspiracy theory