General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA Glimpse of a Canadian-Led International Order
MATT PETERSON at the Atlantic
https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2018/01/new-tpp/551405/
"SNIP..........
The revised TPPnow renamed the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnershipincludes almost none of those controversial provisions on intellectual property. The removal of a number of provisions from the CPTPP that are harmful to peoples access to medicines is a major victory, concluded Doctors Without Borders.
What changed? Canada took the lead on seeking amendments to the TPPs deeply problematic intellectual property chapter, wrote Michael Geist, a Canadian law professor. The IP chapter largely reflected U.S. demands and with its exit from the TPP, an overhaul that more closely aligns the agreement to international standards was needed. These issues were included in the deal because major American companiesnot just pharma but also the software and entertainment industriesrely on strict intellectual property rules to make money, and their interests set the terms for the American negotiating team. Without America making those demands in exchange for access to its markets, it no longer made economic sense for other countries to accept them, said Malcolm.
What may be most remarkablegiven the U.S.s absence from the tableis how much of the original deal struck in October 2015 has stuck, wrote Financial Times trade editor Shawn Donnan. A controversial arrangement whereby companies can sue countries over their domestic laws, known as the investor-state dispute settlement system, remains in a reduced fashion. Labor and environmental protections are largely unchanged. The EFFs Malcolm pointed to e-commerce provisions that provide only weak privacy protections, among other issues, as still being problematic. But overall, the new deal is so similar to the original that Canadian labor unions are furious that their government is still advancing it, just as labor groups in the U.S. objected under Obama. The non-American architects of global trade, in other words, will come to pretty similar agreements even without the U.S.
The biggest change is that the deal is much smaller. Without the U.S., it covers 14 percent of the global economy, down from 40. That means China will have less incentive to join in, as the deals architects had hoped. But membership is open to other countriesSouth Korea and Indonesia are near-term possibilities, and the U.K. has said it wants in, post-Brexitwhich could still sway Chinas calculus.
........SNIP"
Fiendish Thingy
(15,624 posts)applegrove
(118,691 posts)bobbieinok
(12,858 posts)Tarheel_Dem
(31,235 posts)applegrove
(118,691 posts)GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)At least when it comes to economic and trade issues.
We will pay a huge price for abandoning the TPP.
applegrove
(118,691 posts)GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)Cause while it would be cool to personally join TPP, I really have nothing to offer them.