Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,816 posts)
Sat Jan 27, 2018, 01:19 AM Jan 2018

Trump Broke Up with the World, and the World Is Moving On

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/01/trump-broke-up-with-the-world-and-the-world-is-moving-on/amp?__twitter_impression=true

Bess Levin at Vanity Fair

"SNIP.......

Trump’s obsession with bilateral deals is not hard to grok. Multilateral agreements are complex, nuanced, effete. Trump’s brand of deal-making is all about man-to-man dominance, not intricate negotiations between multiple partners. Trade experts, however, view bilateral pacts as something of an anachronism. Last November, longtime trade official Wendy Cutler, who is now the vice president of the Asia Society Policy Institute, told The Washington Post that “none of the trading partners, particularly in Asia, seem to be enthused about such a prospect.” Their disinterest likely has something to do with the fact that, as the Brookings Institution’s Ryan Hass commented last year, the Trump administration’s M.O. on trade “doesn’t reflect modern trade patterns,” such as the fact that a smartphone may contain parts from Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea that are shipped through China before being exported to the U.S. and Europe.

Trump’s legendary deal-making skills haven’t exactly helped—in March, German Chancellor Angela Merkel was forced to gently explain to Trump, “without exposing [his] ignorance,” that Germany, as a member of that thing called the European Union, is unable to strike its own agreement with the U.S. (The tutorial reportedly went over Trump’s head.) Thus far, no additional agreements appear to be forthcoming . . . when asked on Tuesday for an update on any pending deals, National Economic Council Director Gary Cohn had a whole lot of nothing to share:

So where has Trump’s bluster gotten the U.S.? Not only has T.P.P. moved on without us, but Japan is now positioning itself as a free-trade champion that’s more than happy to take on a vacant leadership role. “Now in some parts of the world, there is a move toward protectionism, and I think the T.P.P.-11 is a major engine to overcome such a phenomenon,” Japanese Economy Minister Toshimitsu Motegi said on Tuesday, calling the deal “epoch-making for Japan, as well as for the future of the Asia-Pacific region.”

What’s more, many believe that the pact could serve as a blueprint for a new NAFTA deal in the event that the Trump administration torpedoes the current one. According to The Wall Street Journal, “Senior Mexican officials see the T.P.P. agreement as an indication that the free-trade train is rolling forward with regional pacts, with or without the U.S. aboard, as NAFTA is being renegotiated.” If Trump does make good on his threat to withdraw, other countries will likely surge to the forefront, giving “European and Asian exporters . . . preferential access to the Canadian market that U.S. companies would lack.”


.......SNIP"
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

applegrove

(118,816 posts)
2. It will wake up some in the GOP. They may not fund GOP with gusto
Sat Jan 27, 2018, 01:26 AM
Jan 2018

during the 2018 elections. Especially if the international community starts implementing more liberal policies everywhere.

former9thward

(32,082 posts)
3. What was your position when Clinton made the same criticisms of NAFTA and TPP in 2016?
Sat Jan 27, 2018, 01:27 AM
Jan 2018

She said they were bad agreements and she would change them. I didn't see posts against that position.

applegrove

(118,816 posts)
4. I would like to see more liberal policies in trade agreements. I'm not
Sat Jan 27, 2018, 01:37 AM
Jan 2018

taking the side of the right wing who are losing power and influence around the world but I'm playing devil's advocate. Wondering how the right wing feel not having any influence abroad with Trump in power and then not having any influence abroad when Trump is replaced by a Democrat in 2020. Did not know Obama's trade deals in detail. But i am for trade deals. And for the idea that you can put anything in them you want, not just capitalist right wing things. And i stated that here on the DU years ago. I'm a liberal and anything that allows the sharing of the world's wealth with the people is important to me.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump Broke Up with the W...