General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump Broke Up with the World, and the World Is Moving On
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/01/trump-broke-up-with-the-world-and-the-world-is-moving-on/amp?__twitter_impression=trueBess Levin at Vanity Fair
"SNIP.......
Trumps obsession with bilateral deals is not hard to grok. Multilateral agreements are complex, nuanced, effete. Trumps brand of deal-making is all about man-to-man dominance, not intricate negotiations between multiple partners. Trade experts, however, view bilateral pacts as something of an anachronism. Last November, longtime trade official Wendy Cutler, who is now the vice president of the Asia Society Policy Institute, told The Washington Post that none of the trading partners, particularly in Asia, seem to be enthused about such a prospect. Their disinterest likely has something to do with the fact that, as the Brookings Institutions Ryan Hass commented last year, the Trump administrations M.O. on trade doesnt reflect modern trade patterns, such as the fact that a smartphone may contain parts from Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea that are shipped through China before being exported to the U.S. and Europe.
Trumps legendary deal-making skills havent exactly helpedin March, German Chancellor Angela Merkel was forced to gently explain to Trump, without exposing [his] ignorance, that Germany, as a member of that thing called the European Union, is unable to strike its own agreement with the U.S. (The tutorial reportedly went over Trumps head.) Thus far, no additional agreements appear to be forthcoming . . . when asked on Tuesday for an update on any pending deals, National Economic Council Director Gary Cohn had a whole lot of nothing to share:
So where has Trumps bluster gotten the U.S.? Not only has T.P.P. moved on without us, but Japan is now positioning itself as a free-trade champion thats more than happy to take on a vacant leadership role. Now in some parts of the world, there is a move toward protectionism, and I think the T.P.P.-11 is a major engine to overcome such a phenomenon, Japanese Economy Minister Toshimitsu Motegi said on Tuesday, calling the deal epoch-making for Japan, as well as for the future of the Asia-Pacific region.
Whats more, many believe that the pact could serve as a blueprint for a new NAFTA deal in the event that the Trump administration torpedoes the current one. According to The Wall Street Journal, Senior Mexican officials see the T.P.P. agreement as an indication that the free-trade train is rolling forward with regional pacts, with or without the U.S. aboard, as NAFTA is being renegotiated. If Trump does make good on his threat to withdraw, other countries will likely surge to the forefront, giving European and Asian exporters . . . preferential access to the Canadian market that U.S. companies would lack.
.......SNIP"
msongs
(67,453 posts)applegrove
(118,816 posts)during the 2018 elections. Especially if the international community starts implementing more liberal policies everywhere.
former9thward
(32,082 posts)She said they were bad agreements and she would change them. I didn't see posts against that position.
applegrove
(118,816 posts)taking the side of the right wing who are losing power and influence around the world but I'm playing devil's advocate. Wondering how the right wing feel not having any influence abroad with Trump in power and then not having any influence abroad when Trump is replaced by a Democrat in 2020. Did not know Obama's trade deals in detail. But i am for trade deals. And for the idea that you can put anything in them you want, not just capitalist right wing things. And i stated that here on the DU years ago. I'm a liberal and anything that allows the sharing of the world's wealth with the people is important to me.