General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrumps most desperate move yet? Here's what pushing out Rod Rosenstein would mean.
Trumps most desperate move yet? Heres what pushing out Rod Rosenstein would mean.By Aaron Blake January 29 at 11:15 AM
The New York Times first alluded to it in last week's story about President Trump trying to fire special counsel Robert S. Mueller III. Now we know a good bit more about Trump's apparent desire to also get rid of Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein, who is overseeing Mueller's Russia investigation.
The Washington Post reported over the weekend that Trump recently sought the release of a secret memo that Republicans say could cast a spotlight on bias within federal law enforcement and bias on the part of Rosenstein, who appointed Mueller. CNN quotes Trump as having said of Rosenstein, Let's fire him, let's get rid of him, before being talked out of it. And the Times reports, the memo says Rosenstein personally approved extended surveillance of Trump campaign adviser Carter Page during the 2016 election.
The strategy seems clear: Trump would like to undermine confidence in the investigation and Rosenstein and build the case for either firing him or forcing his resignation.
But what would that even do for Trump?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2018/01/29/trumps-most-desperate-move-yet-heres-what-pushing-out-rod-rosenstein-would-mean/?utm_term=.e710e94cf38d
cilla4progress
(24,736 posts)early
dewsgirl
(14,961 posts)Turbineguy
(37,343 posts)by FBI regulations and policies.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Say, Saturday night massacre?
unblock
(52,253 posts)just stepping down his role, remaining at fbi until he can get full retirement.
50 Shades Of Blue
(10,011 posts)And Repugs won't do a damn thing about it.
HopeAgain
(4,407 posts)on the part of a law enforcement agent become a "bias?" That is what they are basically arguing... that if Rosenstein or Comey or anyone else didn't enter into the investigations as some sort of blank slates, then they were biased.
Can you imagine how ineffective law enforcement would be if we held prosecutors to that standard when they prosecute a cartel leader or mob boss?
cilla4progress
(24,736 posts)March, but just retired today.
Constitutional crisis coming up. Listening to Eric Swalwell now. He's afraid, as I am.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)are gonna go there.
How this country responses may seal the fate of freedom, democracy and rule of law here for all time.
kentuck
(111,103 posts)They already had information of him meeting with a Russian intelligence agent. And he was making unexplained trips to Russia. And Donald Trump gave his name as one of his primary foreign advisers. So wouldn't it have been negligent not to extend surveillance on him???
lindysalsagal
(20,692 posts)[d
iv class="excerpt"]but as always, his lack of understanding of the mechanisms of government checks his authoritarian impulses.
Gotta read this. It's like watergate, again. I just saw the post last night. Incredible.