Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
Mon Jan 29, 2018, 01:42 PM Jan 2018

Trumps most desperate move yet? Here's what pushing out Rod Rosenstein would mean.

Trump’s most desperate move yet? Here’s what pushing out Rod Rosenstein would mean.
By Aaron Blake January 29 at 11:15 AM

The New York Times first alluded to it in last week's story about President Trump trying to fire special counsel Robert S. Mueller III. Now we know a good bit more about Trump's apparent desire to also get rid of Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein, who is overseeing Mueller's Russia investigation.

The Washington Post reported over the weekend that Trump recently sought the release of a “secret” memo that Republicans say could cast a spotlight on bias within federal law enforcement — and bias on the part of Rosenstein, who appointed Mueller. CNN quotes Trump as having said of Rosenstein, “Let's fire him, let's get rid of him,” before being talked out of it. And the Times reports, the memo says Rosenstein personally approved extended surveillance of Trump campaign adviser Carter Page during the 2016 election.

The strategy seems clear: Trump would like to undermine confidence in the investigation and Rosenstein and build the case for either firing him or forcing his resignation.

But what would that even do for Trump?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2018/01/29/trumps-most-desperate-move-yet-heres-what-pushing-out-rod-rosenstein-would-mean/?utm_term=.e710e94cf38d
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trumps most desperate move yet? Here's what pushing out Rod Rosenstein would mean. (Original Post) workinclasszero Jan 2018 OP
Well, McCabe just retired cilla4progress Jan 2018 #1
What? How did I miss this? dewsgirl Jan 2018 #2
He's no longer restricted Turbineguy Jan 2018 #3
This is looking positively Nixonian workinclasszero Jan 2018 #5
maybe i misread it but i thought he wasn't retiring early unblock Jan 2018 #6
Trump will fire Mueller by hook or by crook. 50 Shades Of Blue Jan 2018 #4
Since when has a "suspicion" HopeAgain Jan 2018 #7
He was going to stay till cilla4progress Jan 2018 #8
Yeah Shitler and his traitor party workinclasszero Jan 2018 #9
Why shouldn't he have approved extended surveillance of Carter Page during the 2016 election? kentuck Jan 2018 #10
"checks (the results of ) his authoritarian impulses." MY insertion. lindysalsagal Jan 2018 #11

unblock

(52,253 posts)
6. maybe i misread it but i thought he wasn't retiring early
Mon Jan 29, 2018, 01:48 PM
Jan 2018

just stepping down his role, remaining at fbi until he can get full retirement.

HopeAgain

(4,407 posts)
7. Since when has a "suspicion"
Mon Jan 29, 2018, 01:49 PM
Jan 2018

on the part of a law enforcement agent become a "bias?" That is what they are basically arguing... that if Rosenstein or Comey or anyone else didn't enter into the investigations as some sort of blank slates, then they were biased.

Can you imagine how ineffective law enforcement would be if we held prosecutors to that standard when they prosecute a cartel leader or mob boss?

cilla4progress

(24,736 posts)
8. He was going to stay till
Mon Jan 29, 2018, 01:53 PM
Jan 2018

March, but just retired today.

Constitutional crisis coming up. Listening to Eric Swalwell now. He's afraid, as I am.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
9. Yeah Shitler and his traitor party
Mon Jan 29, 2018, 01:59 PM
Jan 2018

are gonna go there.

How this country responses may seal the fate of freedom, democracy and rule of law here for all time.

kentuck

(111,103 posts)
10. Why shouldn't he have approved extended surveillance of Carter Page during the 2016 election?
Mon Jan 29, 2018, 02:03 PM
Jan 2018

They already had information of him meeting with a Russian intelligence agent. And he was making unexplained trips to Russia. And Donald Trump gave his name as one of his primary foreign advisers. So wouldn't it have been negligent not to extend surveillance on him???

lindysalsagal

(20,692 posts)
11. "checks (the results of ) his authoritarian impulses." MY insertion.
Mon Jan 29, 2018, 02:14 PM
Jan 2018

[d

iv class="excerpt"]but as always, his lack of understanding of the mechanisms of government checks his authoritarian impulses.”


Gotta read this. It's like watergate, again. I just saw the post last night. Incredible.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trumps most desperate mov...