Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Nunes Memo And The Right's Long Campaign To Declare Its Critics Invalid - By Definition
https://crooksandliars.com/2018/02/nunes-memo-and-rights-long-campaignBy Steve M. at Crooks and Liars
"SNIP........
You can hate Democrats if you like, but why would Democrats pay an intelligence professional large amounts of money for lies? If they wanted to attack Trump with falsehoods, they could just make them up. They wanted factual information that was detrimental to Trump. Similarly, why would Steele just make up dirt for his clients? He had a professional reputation to uphold. Both sides had a vested interest in obtaining information that was accurate.
Steele was a widely regarded spy. The FBI thought he was trustworthy. There's every reason to believe that the FISA warrant renewal was based on more than the Steele dossier (though Nunes takes great pains to conceal that fact), but there's also good reason to believe that Steele obtained real dirt.
But to Republicans, it's all invalid because it's fruit of the poison tree: the Democratic Party, which is a poison tree by definition.
There's also this in the memo:
...........
What the memo refers to as Steele's "bias" might just be Steele's attitude toward Trump after learning all the skeezy things he'd learned about Trump in the course of his investigations. If you're spying on Joe Blow and your espionage uncovers the fact that Blow is a bad person, does learning about Blow's deparavity mean you have bias against Blow and should no longer stay on the Blow case? That's not a standard I'd like applied to law enforcement officers investigating serial killers, rapists, terrorists, pedophiles, child pornographers, industrial polluters, Ponzi-scheme operators....
........SNIP"
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 942 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Nunes Memo And The Right's Long Campaign To Declare Its Critics Invalid - By Definition (Original Post)
applegrove
Feb 2018
OP
Like Bill Maher said - it's like exterminators having a "bias" against termites.
The Velveteen Ocelot
Feb 2018
#1
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,858 posts)1. Like Bill Maher said - it's like exterminators having a "bias" against termites.
Steele didn't want Trump to become president of the U.S., even though he's not an American citizen, because of the stuff he discovered. And not just peeing hookers.
applegrove
(118,793 posts)2. That's it exactly.
Mister Ed
(5,944 posts)3. I hear Elliot Ness was biased against Al Capone, too.
By golly, he should've been fired for that.