I wish the Dems would use it. I was actually using it a few days before the speech (as where others of course).

Trump USA

Personal loyalty oaths
Political disagreements are treasonous
Calls to jail political opponents

Shorter syllables to keep it rolling of the tongue....

My personal favorite is Comrade Trump....ties him to Russia and where the treason begins....



I wish not just Democrats, but all patriotic Americans would use those terms....

I like the alliteration of TT.

Shorthand: TT likes PP (Politburo Pence)

Of course, a lot of the "poorly educated" that he claims to love won't get it........

I have to disagree with this one. I hate "he who shall not be named" with a burning passion, but it is impossible for him to commit treason. He is guilty of LOTs of things that should land him in jail, but treason is not one of them.
He only showed his stupidity yesterday when he used that word to describe Democrats that didnt clap for him.

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 807; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(2)(J), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)


1. Failure to enforce legislative mandated sanctions is giving Russians aid and comfort.
2. Colluding with Russians to eliminate prior sanctions as a quid pro quo for assistance in winning a U.S. election is giving aid and comfort.
3. Interference by the Russian government in our elections is an act of war thus they are enemies. Don't believe me, then believe Dick Cheney (maybe the only truthful thing he has ever said). http://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/325928-cheney-russian-election-interference-could-be-act-of-war

when the USA is engaged in a war that has been declared a war by Congress.
That is the reason that no one has been tried for treason since WWII. ( more explicitly since participating in WW2 )

Sedition Act 1948. ... The act criminalises speech with "seditious tendency", including that which would "bring into hatred or contempt or to excite disaffection against" the government or engender "feelings of ill-will and hostility between different races".
Sedition Act 1948 - Wikipedia

that fit the PGIC that are true. Liar, bigot, racist, pig, misogynist, evil, divider....the list goes on and on, without calling him names that don't actually apply. The sedition one is not one I am familiar with. I would have to do some research. From that definition alone, it sounds like something the PGIC has done.

obtained your information? Thanks...

https://www.msnbc.com/the-last-word/watch/lawrence-what-donald-trump-doesn-t-know-about-treason-1154480707764

I had a much broader definition of treason in my head.

The word "treason" should not be thrown around lightly. Treason is the only crime defined in the Constitution. The reason the Constitution defines treason is to limit it. Without a war there can be no treason.

Trump is disloyal and unAmerican (not to mention, narcisstic, racist, etc.) but not treasonous.

Just because that idiot misuses a word is no reason for the rest of us do so.

Call me hawkish, but I believe Russia flagrant acts of cyber espionage and campaign interference may well rise to an act of war. I doubt we will ever engage in a conventional war with Russia or China, but I have little doubt that at some point in the future the United States will engage in a cyber war with any one of a number of our adversaries. Thus the traditional definition of “war”
as contained in the U.S. Code will be expanded when interpreted by the courts. While I haven’t read the statue dealing with treason and do not know if the word “war” was defined, surely the concept of war will need to expand to take into account acts of war (aggression, attacks) against the nation. Should Russia continue meddling in our country’s right to free and fair elections then I believe we have to defend ourselves through any means necessary, including military actions as a last resort.

It also might be that the strategy is to throw the word "Treason" around before it is actually what would be said of him when he is charged and exposed on the crimes he committed.....maybe to muddle the word and the seriousness of it...maybe to rally the base to be supporting him against the "real traitors" and re-direct the base against those that would dare to call him that...

But I think even if its all of the above, he definitely is projecting his own crimes....

He turned a real story that had negative implications against him into a clichéd tagline for him to throw out whenever he wanted.

Love Merkley! Go Oregon!

More pure projection

Let’s just add this to the others, lol.

I'm gonna make a clip later today. LOL Thanks!

Never, not for the most trivial thing. I know he just tossed it out there because he was high on endorphins from his adoring fans cheering him on, but it's too late--he said it. He will deny he said it, video proof or not! But he said it.

Even if that report has to be leaked, if, say, Rosenstein is replaced.

His Freudian slips will fill books.
Now that the cat is out of the bag it is time to have a national discussion of exactly what "treason" is.

required to have that discussion.

You know, like google the word.

Maybe if you throw in some sex, they could handle it:

"Is it treason if the President keeps buying his wives from Eastern Europe and paid RUSSIAN hookers to pee on him?"

This is a great idea!

I’m starting today!

apparently tRump doesn't know shit.


"Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open Court.

So this may be how 'consciousness of guilt' manifests itself

movie Shaka Zulu Dr Fynn describes loyal subjects praising Shaka -

His troops would slaughter those not praising so the praise continued very vigorously.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="

" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>

"treasonous" at Dems.. because they wouldn't clap for the Russian mole.. to BackFire so much..