General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSpeak up, Paul Ryan - The Washington Post Editorial Board
By Editorial Board February 6 at 1:01 PM
-snip-
GOP lawmakers who insisted that the Nunes memo should do no harm to the Russia investigation were fooling themselves, or else trying to fool the rest of us, about the memos transparent purpose: to provide Mr. Trump a pretext to delegitimize or terminate the probe. Not surprisingly, Mr. Trump immediately claimed that the memo totally vindicates him and that the Russia probe is a Witch Hunt run by a hostile FBI. The Nunes memo does not prove any such thing. But polls show it has helped muddy the FBIs reputation among Mr. Trumps supporters.
If Mr. Ryan wanted only to promote congressional oversight of law enforcement, as he says, he would have insisted that the Nunes memo and the Democratic response emerge simultaneously or, better, he would have installed committee leadership that would conduct a bipartisan process truly aimed at discovering and then laying out the truth. Instead, the memo the president wanted released is out, and the fate of the Democratic response lies in Mr. Trumps hands. Monday on Twitter, Mr. Trump encouraged speculation that he would squelch the Democratic memo by lashing out at its author, Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.).
Mr. Ryan should now publicly insist that the president approve the release of the Democratic response. He also should remove Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), the loose-cannon chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, who is apparently preparing more memos for release. Then the speaker should bring up legislation to shield special counsel Robert S. Mueller III from any White House attempt to undermine or fire him. Republicans argue that no legislation is needed, as the president has made no move against Mr. Mueller or his supervisor, Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein. But, judging by the presidents aggressive attacks on the Russia probe, the next move might be their termination.
As always, its difficult but important to remember what is at stake. A foreign power interfered with an American election. Rather than help defend the country against future interference, the president is slandering the nations law enforcement and intelligence agencies. Mr. Ryan can abet the slander, or he can help defend the country.
Full editorial:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/speak-up-paul-ryan/2018/02/06/9efc4fde-0abf-11e8-8b0d-891602206fb7_story.html
UncleTomsEvilBrother
(945 posts)...for the simple fact that people seem to expect Paul Ryan to be any better than the Joffrey Baratheon character operating the President's seat right now.
Ryan is not going to move on DACA without 45's consent, helped ushered in the tax scam, and is now foaming at the mouth in anticipation of gutting Medicaid.
What about Ryan other than the fact that he is a Catholic, white, male do people think is so inherently good about him?
Amaryllis
(9,525 posts)"GOP lawmakers who insisted that the Nunes memo should do no harm to the Russia investigation were FOULING themselves..."
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)So yeah, I agree with the "fooling themselves" or "making fools of themselves" comment.