Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Breaking: Sen. Schumer and McConnell Announce Agreement on Two-Year Budget Deal (Original Post) bigtree Feb 2018 OP
Trump will reject it SummerSnow Feb 2018 #1
the house will reject it first spanone Feb 2018 #6
this is McConnell advancing the bill bigtree Feb 2018 #9
we'll see... spanone Feb 2018 #11
I don't think there's a question that the Dem leader wouldn't move on a budget deal bigtree Feb 2018 #12
i find it hard to believe that mcconnell would sign on to that and have to sell it to his goons.... spanone Feb 2018 #13
the 'secret' about DACA bigtree Feb 2018 #15
it won't be that simple bigtree Feb 2018 #8
So who is going to buy the bonds? exboyfil Feb 2018 #2
And DACA? HopeAgain Feb 2018 #3
well, the guy has his Twitter page dedicated to Dreamers bigtree Feb 2018 #7
No DACA and no wall funding it looks. DetroitLegalBeagle Feb 2018 #10
that's not accurate bigtree Feb 2018 #14
Once there is a budget, what is our DACA leverage? HopeAgain Feb 2018 #20
it was less 'leverage' than it was hostage to the budget bill bigtree Feb 2018 #21
So what about Trump? HopeAgain Feb 2018 #23
67 votes to override in the Senate and 290 in the House bigtree Feb 2018 #24
NPR this morning said that speculation was a seperate DACA Bill would be introduced Friday nt sweetloukillbot Feb 2018 #18
here's Tim Kaine bigtree Feb 2018 #19
Actually, there are 3 weeks left on Trump's DACA ultimatum... Wounded Bear Feb 2018 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author bigtree Feb 2018 #4
Roll Call makes no specific mention of wall funding, Hortensis Feb 2018 #5
OR leftynyc Feb 2018 #16
McConnell? Thinking the nation would start blaming Hortensis Feb 2018 #17
Donnie very helpfully leftynyc Feb 2018 #25
If it gives trump a win as in funding for the wall, that could be a huge mistake for November Eliot Rosewater Feb 2018 #26
Huge difference between not wanting to satisfy his vanity Hortensis Feb 2018 #27
I said a while back if we had to give the traitor his wall to protect DACA and other immigrants then Eliot Rosewater Feb 2018 #28
Makes sense. And I agree that there are more Hortensis Feb 2018 #30
Oh goody, more defense spending. Owl Feb 2018 #29

bigtree

(86,006 posts)
9. this is McConnell advancing the bill
Wed Feb 7, 2018, 02:33 PM
Feb 2018

...there's evidently something more to this surprise agreement than meets the eye.

Conservatives are beside themselves over the short-term funding bills. A longer-term budget will find a lot of support from the House republicans, especially since they're not going to get a better deal, and likely are looking at a Democratic House this time next year.

spanone

(135,891 posts)
11. we'll see...
Wed Feb 7, 2018, 02:38 PM
Feb 2018
While the bill is expected to pass easily in the Senate, the House will be a tougher sell. The caps deal will likely need Democratic support and some Democrats have been emphatic that they don't want to agree to raising budget caps until they have assurances that recipients of DACA, the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, will be protected. Conservatives in the House are also expected to balk at a deal that raises spending by $300 billion over the next two years. Something will have to give if Ryan is going to get the bill across the finish line.


https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/07/politics/senate-announces-deal-budget-caps-agreement/index.html

bigtree

(86,006 posts)
12. I don't think there's a question that the Dem leader wouldn't move on a budget deal
Wed Feb 7, 2018, 02:43 PM
Feb 2018

...without some agreement on DACA.

I can imagine a few reasons why one isn't forthcoming at this hour, but I'm nearly positive Schumer isn't going to blow up his leadership by leaving Dreamers behind.

Have you seen his twitter page? https://twitter.com/SenSchumer

spanone

(135,891 posts)
13. i find it hard to believe that mcconnell would sign on to that and have to sell it to his goons....
Wed Feb 7, 2018, 02:45 PM
Feb 2018

but I seriously hope you're right

bigtree

(86,006 posts)
15. the 'secret' about DACA
Wed Feb 7, 2018, 02:52 PM
Feb 2018

..is that republicans aren't as crazy as Trump to start deporting Dreamers.

In fact, there's a large lobby of their business buds who are literally invested in finding a solution to keep these immigrants here.

There's going to be a fix. What shape and direction it will take is still being negotiated, but no one has come out and said the McConnell/Schumer 'agreement' on taking up DACA is dead, and I don't expect that will happen.

bigtree

(86,006 posts)
8. it won't be that simple
Wed Feb 7, 2018, 02:28 PM
Feb 2018

...especially if McConnell can organize his party members for a veto-proof majority.

Remember who McConnell is. He's as far right as he can be. Trump isn't going to get a better deal in the Senate. This agreement with him must represent a way around Trump.

bigtree

(86,006 posts)
7. well, the guy has his Twitter page dedicated to Dreamers
Wed Feb 7, 2018, 02:26 PM
Feb 2018

...so it's a good bet that a DACA vote is in the mix of this deal.

I don't see anything on it yet, though.

DetroitLegalBeagle

(1,927 posts)
10. No DACA and no wall funding it looks.
Wed Feb 7, 2018, 02:38 PM
Feb 2018

More defense spending, some infrastructure, and funds CHIP for 10 years.

bigtree

(86,006 posts)
14. that's not accurate
Wed Feb 7, 2018, 02:46 PM
Feb 2018

...a DACA fix is still the subject of bipartisan negotiation in the Senate, with a bill almost certain to emerge.

The politics are plain for all to see, but it's not accurate that DACA isn't going to be part of moving forward. Indeed, one couldn't countenance the Dem leader abandoning the agreement he made with the Speaker. Stay tuned.

HopeAgain

(4,407 posts)
20. Once there is a budget, what is our DACA leverage?
Wed Feb 7, 2018, 04:17 PM
Feb 2018

I fear this is not going to end well for the Dreamers.

bigtree

(86,006 posts)
21. it was less 'leverage' than it was hostage to the budget bill
Wed Feb 7, 2018, 04:29 PM
Feb 2018

...remember, there wasn't/isn't yet an actual DACA bill to bring to the floor for a vote; no actual DACA legislation included in the short-term funding bills.

What Dems have been arguing for is a chance for a floor debate and vote; regular order with amendments and the works, something which has been denied them so far.

What Schumer obtained is an agreement with McConnell to move 'immediately' after the budget vote to an 'immigration' debate which will include or feature a fix for Trump's arbitrary deadline ending the DACA.

There's even word of an extension if the floor debate goes past the expiration date, so I think we should be reacting to this like we do regular legislation with lobbying our legislators and the works. There's going to be a bill on the floor and the Senate is going to hold votes, that's pretty clear.

HopeAgain

(4,407 posts)
23. So what about Trump?
Wed Feb 7, 2018, 04:36 PM
Feb 2018

Not tied to a budget, he can veto with impunity. Don't underestimate the pressure the deplorables are putting on the Republican Congress, and the President, to deport them all. I don't see a veto-proof bill going to the White House.

bigtree

(86,006 posts)
19. here's Tim Kaine
Wed Feb 7, 2018, 03:27 PM
Feb 2018

Tim Kaine @timkaine
17m17 minutes ago

The Senate must pass this budget deal in short order, then we will immediately move to immigration legislation. I will continue pushing for a bill that permanently protects Dreamers and does not needlessly restrict legal immigration to rip families apart. That would be a mistake.

Wounded Bear

(58,726 posts)
22. Actually, there are 3 weeks left on Trump's DACA ultimatum...
Wed Feb 7, 2018, 04:33 PM
Feb 2018

Hard to believe Repub promises that they'll negotiate on it, but it's not worth another shutdown yet.

Response to bigtree (Original post)

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
5. Roll Call makes no specific mention of wall funding,
Wed Feb 7, 2018, 02:21 PM
Feb 2018

but I don't think McConnell would be smiling at this point if he knew it was all going to collapse because Trump would veto. Still have to pass a house bill then reconcile the two, and feed and manipulate Trump.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
17. McConnell? Thinking the nation would start blaming
Wed Feb 7, 2018, 03:03 PM
Feb 2018

Trump for the shutdown and the Republican congress would be off the hook? Maybe. Seems like they'd still have a shutdown and a newly poked, even angrier bull in the national china shop.

?

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
25. Donnie very helpfully
Wed Feb 7, 2018, 05:32 PM
Feb 2018

put himself on the hook yesterday by claiming he'd love a shutdown. Irrelevant now as they seem to have struck a deal in the senate. We'll see what the House does.

Eliot Rosewater

(31,125 posts)
26. If it gives trump a win as in funding for the wall, that could be a huge mistake for November
Wed Feb 7, 2018, 05:43 PM
Feb 2018

God god god I hope it doesnt

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
27. Huge difference between not wanting to satisfy his vanity
Wed Feb 7, 2018, 05:52 PM
Feb 2018

and what's important. No one wants that insulting wall, stupid and obsolete before it's even erected.

But, remember, people at this level can't take any action without hurting some groups or people, certainly not something as big as the many deals involved in funding our government.

Notably, if the DACA group are deported, all will be traumatized and their lives derailed, but also not all will survive to someday return if they want. Then there are all the other immigrants whose futures are on the line one way or another.

Some things are just more important than others, and both Trump's pride and ours are way down the list.

Biden put it more gently in that interview, but pandering to their own egos is strictly an indulgence for bad politicians. Republicans, not ours.

Eliot Rosewater

(31,125 posts)
28. I said a while back if we had to give the traitor his wall to protect DACA and other immigrants then
Wed Feb 7, 2018, 05:58 PM
Feb 2018

so be it, but I now think that does more harm than good.

Not about pride for me, it is about him getting a win and allegedly proving what a great negotiator he is when he is of course the worst in human history.

Our blue wave slows WAY down if that happens and the only thing worse than destroying the DACA lives is not taking back the house, we can bring those people back if they are deported but we cant come back from not taking back the government. We all lose at that point, including immigrants, dreamers, etc.

I could be wrong but that is my thinking - I have said in the past NO life is worth winning or losing a deal that we should be willing to lose deals to save lives but we are not dealing with rational people anymore so we have to think about this.

Again, has zip to do with his vanity but everything to do with the perception among the 30 million Americans who can be swayed not to do the right thing based on stupid stuff like the wall.

i.e. if it was ONLY about his vanity I would not risk ONE Life, I would let the traitor have his win...but it is more than that

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
30. Makes sense. And I agree that there are more
Wed Feb 7, 2018, 07:22 PM
Feb 2018

dangerous and hurtful things on the line even than failing the DACA kids.

The opportunity cost of giving him his wall is giving up a failure for him right now. Reportedly, what could cause his base to lose faith in him is to find they've backed a loser. But most would rationalize it away anyway at this point, and there'll be plenty of other opportunities for that. Remember the Russia investigation alone. And remember that W failed for years, but they only turned on him in the last quarter of the 8th year, the base in the last two weeks of that 8th year when they finally admitted he wasn't going to pull off some magic victories to turn it all around.

Meanwhile, 78-80% of all Americans, including a majority of Republicans, strongly want to protect DACA. Just maybe bartering with the lives of these kids won't quell the doubts that are already depressing turnout?

Glad it's not my decision.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Breaking: Sen. Schumer an...