But fun. I admit I have them bookmarked. Just know not to believe them.

They pay for stories and photos so they often have juicy stuff.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5338917/Global-temperatures-break-1-5-C-FIVE-years.html

Global temperatures could break through the 1.5°C Paris Agreement threshold within FIVE years and cause weather chaos, Met Office warns

Average temperatures could be 1.5°C higher during the period 2018 and 2022

This is the first time such high values have been highlighted by the Met Office

Last year was almost 1°C warmer than pre-industrial levels from 1850 to 1900

The UKpress regulator forcedThe Mail on Sunday, their Sunday paper, to run a lengthy correction about a David Rose article, published Feb 2017, busted Sept. Maybe that scared them. Maybe their Sunday paper has a different editorial slant? But the guy who ran them in the thirties was literally a friend of Benito and Adolph, they literally ran a forged letter attributed to a liberal mp to successfully swing parliament to conservatives around 1920. They have been evil, like Fox. But since Cicada is not my real name I can confess I read them everyday for the dirty celebrity photos people likeKim’s mom wants me to see, I know I will go to hell for it, and some other actually interesting stories.

But sometimes, especially with interviews, they are a real source.

The British paper I really respect, though, is The Guardian. As I remember it, they were the only paper that didn't go on the Amanda Knox hunt -- a subject I followed closely at the time. Their coverage was fair.

Unlike our bland namely pamby papers their news actually told what was REALLY happening. What the news really meant. And best of the best was the Guardian, writing to die for. On my second visit Clement Freud was running for parliament He actually visited the district. He said he could not be sure but he thought his opponent never visited the district because he was, in fact, a midget. At another rally in a big barn in the Cotswold he said I’m looking at my Watch not because it’s late but because this Watch has great sentimental value to me. On his death bed my famous grandfather, Sigmund Freud, sold me this Watch.

What a breath of fresh air their politics was.

Last edited Thu Feb 8, 2018, 02:14 AM - Edit history (1)

heavy handed serial abuser of women.

And, trump's COS stuck up for him.. What was it Kelly said?.. ".. Porter had honor and integrity.."?..

just like trump is a serial sexual predator.. but the Russians couldn't care less.. neither did his screaming fans. Nor stein and sarandon when they lied.. "..Hillary is more dangerous than trump"***

***Reposted from another thread on Portman.

Like scheming daemons said..

The Brits are going to help us save our Republic

https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=10202778

Thank you, pnwmom

Edit.. I don't know why I was calling him "Portman"

It’s still a shitshow because Trump and everything he touches, but I hope these women find closure and justice

but of late they have been publishing very anti-Trump pieces...not sure what has changed

at a Trump rally and now this winner Porter.

that is Trump & Co.

to see if the Democratic response gets the same treatment, or if they smother it.

In the meantime, they did publish this.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5349421/John-McCain-condemns-release-Republican-memo.html

John McCain condemns release of the GOP memo and says 'we are doing Putin's job for him'
McCain released a written statement on Friday when the memo was declassified
GOP Senator said that 'partisan attacks' on the FBI serve 'only Putin's interests'
Memo charges the FBI relied primarily on a politically-motivated dossier compiled by ex-British intelligence officer Christopher Steele
Republicans claim it shows bias in the FBI at the onset of the Russia probe
The FBI had opposed the memo's release, citing 'grave concerns about material omissions of fact'
President Donald Trump tweeted on Saturday that the memo 'vindicated' him