General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDid Rachel Maddow just almost burst into tears
saying that Rachel Brand leaving could be the thing that allows Trump to end the Mueller investigation?
JenniferJuniper
(4,515 posts)MFM008
(19,820 posts)Is coming.
Now I'm supposed to relax........
standingtall
(2,787 posts)Even if Trump is able to fire Mueller if Democrats win back the house they could and should impeach Trump and the also could pass legislation to appoint an independent council in which Trump will not be able to fire.
milestogo
(16,829 posts)so the Dems winning back the house is no sure thing.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Ferrets are Cool
(21,110 posts)samnsara
(17,636 posts)BigmanPigman
(51,630 posts)SHIT...now WE could be really screwed if Rosenstein goes down. I understand why she did it though. This is getting scarier.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,123 posts)lunasun
(21,646 posts)Foundation , Scalia law school, , recently appointed by trump ,part of FL recount 2000, served under BushII after working his campaign , went against board when Obama was in
She doesnt want to get into it with Trump so she is dropping out, but is she someone to miss?
Response to lunasun (Reply #8)
ResIpsa This message was self-deleted by its author.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)the friend of my enemy is not my friend
Response to lunasun (Reply #15)
ResIpsa This message was self-deleted by its author.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)I like walking across a parking lot and hearing others listening to the show as they pull,up window down . Everyplace needs this or tune in listen live online (although some shows deal with very local issues only )
Still plenty of national syndicate out there . People need to be aware
http://www.wcpt820.com
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,868 posts)She could be right but she's no more prescient than anyone else.
Response to The Velveteen Ocelot (Reply #9)
VOX This message was self-deleted by its author.
VOX
(22,976 posts)Because with Trump and company in charge, the events themselves have been unrelentingly negative. Rachel doesnt even have to add any doom-and-gloom spin, as the stories out of 45s White House are completely insane. She presents details like nobody else, and she does her homework.
Shes also been absolutely on top of the Russia collusion story from the beginning. Its no surprise that, since last November, her ratings have been superb, often beating Hannitys viewership in the prime-time news slot.
JUST TO MAKE SURE: Im not being hostile here at all, I appreciate your posts and wit (not to mention whats probably the best ID name on DU) as a longtime DUer myself. I just see Rachels reporting differently some folks cannot stand her lengthy, 20-minute build-ups (which I get), but I like her detail-work myself.
On edit: My previous self-delete was a duplicate post of this one; somehow I achieved the difficult double-post
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,868 posts)and I've noticed many times that she tends to take a pessimistic view of things. I believe her to be thorough and well-informed but she can't predict the future. I don't know what will happen. Neither does she. But she can often be a bit disheartening because of her pessimism.
And I've posted this comment in only ONE other thread.
VOX
(22,976 posts)I understand what youre saying now. She does wade into deep detail, where an audience will hear some seriously bad stuff from multiple angles simultaneously. Sometimes her formidable intellect can be TOO sobering.
I like her approach, perhaps because Im a bit of a pessimist myself, and things are so insane now that, paradoxically, her serpentine trails of case-building actually make me feel better (!), because its as if someone (in this case, Rachel) is slogging along, making connections, and doing the homework that not many appear to be doing. (Emphasis on appear.)
But I realize that her approach isnt for everyone her tonnage of detail could make one feel overwhelmed and defeated. Its like drinking Bacardi 151 proof straight from the bottle.
Thanks for the clarification, VO. Much appreciated.
ooky
(8,929 posts)and some of this is just hard to talk about without becoming attached to it, and its all so negative. Just my opinion though.
VOX
(22,976 posts)Which is unhealthy, to say the least. Ive had to deliberately engage in somethinganything to distract myself from all the crap thats going on.
Thanks, ooky your opinion is 100% valid here!
Its a strange time. Like nothing we ever could have imagined. Gotta hope now the election will bring big changes.
Cha
(297,693 posts)VOX
(22,976 posts)Its been a long slog, but I made it. Its my biggest achievement of the day...so far.
Cha
(297,693 posts)all the time. Not just me.. there were lots of them. It's gotten a lot better.. so it wasn't easy what you did, VOX.
Kirk Lover
(3,608 posts)cilla4progress
(24,775 posts)Easy.
RESIST!
IluvPitties
(3,181 posts)jalan48
(13,887 posts)oasis
(49,410 posts)The sky is not falling. Keep hope alive!
Takket
(21,632 posts)her stepping down isn't going to effect anything.
milestogo
(16,829 posts)to end the investigation.
GReedDiamond
(5,316 posts)...I came up with: Brand "resigns" and is replaced by a Twitler Toadie for #3 DoJ position.
Next, Fake Preznit Cheetolini orders #2 DoJ Rosenstein to fire Mueller.
Rosenstein refuses to fire Mueller, and for that, he is sacked.
The DoJ #3 Twitler Toadie becomes #2 at DoJ and happily fires Mueller.
Twitler appoints a new #3 Twitler Toadie.
Lather Rinse Repeat when necessary.
The end.
Turbineguy
(37,370 posts)It could be that things came together for Ms. Brand and that's why she left.
We really don't know how this will shake out.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,902 posts)She's a Trump appointee, and now she's going to Walmart, that well-known bastion of liberal progressiveness. Oh, wait. They're not.
In fact, all of you who think her leaving is something tragic, consider very carefully where she's going. Not to some liberal think tank. Not to some progressive non profit. Hell, she's not even going in to private practice. Nope. Walmart. Fucking Walmart.
So if Maddow seems sad at her departure, then she's uninformed here, which is scary and would make me re-think her stance on lots of things.