General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHanford worker who inhaled plutonium: Im scared. This is criminal
(For those who don't know, Hanford Washington is where the atomic bomb was created and is a massive nuclear waste facility)
For the first time since an extremely dangerous demolition job at Hanford started losing a grip on its safety plan, a Hanford worker directly impacted by the failures has granted an interview.
The worker tested positive for inhalation of the potential lethal nuclear isotope of plutonium a key ingredient to the production of nuclear bombs and warheads.
Im pissed. Im scared, like we all are, that sooner or later its going to bite me and Im going to end up with cancer, said the contaminated worker.
For fear of retaliation, the worker does not want to be identified. Eight months ago, on June 8, the person was one of hundreds working on the demolition of Hanfords Plutonium Finishing Plant (PFP). The workers were told to take cover as a precaution because monitors detected radioactive plutonium particles could be in the air.
http://www.king5.com/article/news/local/hanford/hanford-worker-who-inhaled-plutonium-im-scared-this-is-criminal/281-517526634?utm_campaign=trueAnthem:+Trending+Content&utm_content=5a815eac19694a000700c3e4&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=twitter
dewsgirl
(14,961 posts)subjects of my nightmares, I feel terrified for this guy.
I was traumatized by the movies Silkwood, the Day after Tomorrow and Nostradamus:the Man who Saw Tomorrow when I was very young and impressionable, leaving me paralyzed with fear of all things radioactive.
TheBlackAdder
(28,218 posts).
Anything that is organic has polonium-210 in it, especially vegetation.
Normally, these are trace amounts that are trapped within the item. If eaten, they are passed as waste. The human skin reflects polonium-210, so if it is free ranging in the air, it won't break the skin barrier where it could do harm over time. However, if it is smoked or inhaled, it remains trapped inside of the skin layer and can scatter around until it lodges somewhere. This is one of the causes of lung and smoking/tobacco related cancers. Another is heat. Lungs and throat tissues do not react well to excessive heat. Doctors at Fox Chase in Elkins park, PA state that hot showers are extremely bad for lung tissue too.
I saw a Nova show on this years back. At the time, I had a StaticMaster to remove the static from my records, and that uses polonium-210. (Hint: that could be a legal source of polonium-210 to acquire, as they are still available.) Afterwards, I threw the thing in the trash. I was scared to have it around. That was back in the 1980s.
.
dewsgirl
(14,961 posts)how much weed releases? Due to my fears, I also have a seriously morbid fascination with radiation, documentaries, books, the Alexander Litvinenko case, Chernobyl....etc.
TheBlackAdder
(28,218 posts).
The show I watched said that a person smoking a pack and a half of cigarettes a day
gets the equivalent dosage of radiation, over the course of a year, as 300 chest x-rays.
So crunching numbers:
365 days x 1.5 packs = 547.5 packs in a year.
547.5 packs / 300 x-rays = 1.825 packs per x-ray.
.
icymist
(15,888 posts)As far as I know plutonium is the stuff that can kill you.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutonium
TheBlackAdder
(28,218 posts)Polonium is found in marijuana, and other smoking organic substances and that conflicts with her weed avatar.
icymist
(15,888 posts)dewsgirl
(14,961 posts)Know why.
dewsgirl
(14,961 posts)Litvinenko?
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)Just sent him the article!
suffragette
(12,232 posts)conducting investigative reporting on it.
Article is well worth the full read.
Unacceptable measurements in June, December and now in February.
Plutonium detected in people, on them and on their vehicles.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)The river drains into the Pacific ocean near Portland, Ore.
The Pacific salmon swim up the river to spawn. The hatched fish swim down river to teh ocean.
I have not been able to find any reports of testing for the water or the fish.
Or of the streams, rivers, wells in the area which are used for irrigation of food crops.
My family spent a lot of time in E. Washington, off and on , when I was a kid. There seemed to be a universal acceptance that the Hanford was safe outside of the fenced areas, that somehow wire fences would keep radiation from spreading in the air.
suffragette
(12,232 posts)About how the clean-up is continually delayed and goal years are moved further down the road.
Testing, when done, has been spotty, rather than in a consistent manner.
And information like the tunnels collapsing last summer and now these revelations that plutonium was found on and in people and their vehicles gets downplayed by the contractors and DOE.
And you never see reports that there is still a functioning nuclear plant on Hanford site. When I brought it up once, a poster here lambasted me, repeatedly saying he or she didnt consider it part of Hanford therefore it wasnt - even after I provided links from government agency showing it is. Sent me nasty PM too.
herding cats
(19,568 posts)I realize this isnt exactly on topic, but it needs to be mentioned I believe. Were just going to see more inept contractors and subsequent accidents if we dont get serious about funding this sites cleanup efforts.
https://www.opb.org/news/article/hanford-nuclear-reservation-trump-administration-budget-2018/