Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TomCADem

(17,390 posts)
Sat Feb 17, 2018, 05:36 PM Feb 2018

WaPo (10/17) - Federal government has long ignored white supremacist threats, critics say

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/federal-government-has-long-ignored-white-supremacist-threats-critics-say/2017/09/02/bf2ed00c-8698-11e7-961d-2f373b3977ee_story.html?utm_term=.f40b43809295

On June 3, 2014, Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. restarted a long-dormant domestic terrorism task force created after the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing. A former Ku Klux Klan leader had just murdered three people near a Jewish Community Center in a Kansas City suburb and yelled "Heil Hitler" as police took him into custody.

For too long, Holder said, the federal government had narrowly focused on Islamist threats and had lost sight of the "continued danger we face" from violent far-right extremists.

But three years later, it is unclear what, if anything the Domestic Terrorism Executive Committee has done, despite expectations that its reanimation would better focus efforts throughout the Justice Department to disrupt and detect plots in a more centralized way, as was already being done by the department and FBI when it came to hunting Islamist terrorists.

As President Trump continues to suffer political backlash for his response to the deadly Charlottesville protests led by white supremacists, analysts who follow far-right groups say generations of neglect by multiple administrations has allowed them to proliferate and strengthen.
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WaPo (10/17) - Federal government has long ignored white supremacist threats, critics say (Original Post) TomCADem Feb 2018 OP
If I recall correctly, a couple of years ago the republicans buried a report that covered extremist shraby Feb 2018 #1
The GOP does not want to upset its supporters! n/t RKP5637 Feb 2018 #2
That would be UpInArms Feb 2018 #3
Yep! n/t RKP5637 Feb 2018 #4
Well WestIndianArchie Feb 2018 #5
You can't round people up for their views... oxbow Feb 2018 #6
Oh but you can and the society will WestIndianArchie Feb 2018 #7
Ive been too, so I know they talk the same way about you oxbow Feb 2018 #8
Oh WestIndianArchie Feb 2018 #9
No I dont oxbow Feb 2018 #10
Got it WestIndianArchie Feb 2018 #11
You can never round them all up oxbow Feb 2018 #12
ok WestIndianArchie Feb 2018 #13
happy to leave it there oxbow Feb 2018 #14
2008 WestIndianArchie Feb 2018 #15

shraby

(21,946 posts)
1. If I recall correctly, a couple of years ago the republicans buried a report that covered extremist
Sat Feb 17, 2018, 05:39 PM
Feb 2018

groups in the country. It was due to go public and they hid it in the weeds.

WestIndianArchie

(386 posts)
5. Well
Sat Feb 17, 2018, 05:57 PM
Feb 2018

Racist behavior is the root of all social and economic ills of America. These racist/white supremacists have to be rounded up and imprisoned if we are going to move our country forward, these savages must be held accountable for their abhorrent behavior. Gun control laws will do nothing to curb gun violence, until we get really serious about those actually committing the violence. Racist/white supremacists are DANGEROUS people and we must stop playing with them.

oxbow

(2,034 posts)
6. You can't round people up for their views...
Sat Feb 17, 2018, 06:19 PM
Feb 2018

...as abhorrent as they may be. If said white supremacists were to harm or plan to somehow harm another human being, that would be something actionable. This is not a political battle but a cultural one; love and tolerance vs. fear and exclusion

WestIndianArchie

(386 posts)
7. Oh but you can and the society will
Sat Feb 17, 2018, 07:30 PM
Feb 2018

I've been to their sites and all I can see is a bunch of DANGEROUS savages
arming themselves, talking about threatening to do harm and actively training to do so. I guess you missed the part about the school shooter being a self-avowed degenerate racist/white supremacist? Round them up. There is enough terrorist-related legislation already on the books.

oxbow

(2,034 posts)
8. Ive been too, so I know they talk the same way about you
Sat Feb 17, 2018, 07:49 PM
Feb 2018

Degenerate...savage...these are words you use when you want to dehumanize a group of people.

The gunman had threatened to kill people. It was not taken seriously. It doesn’t matter why he wanted to do it. It could have been stopped through a better investigation (or at least minimized through protections against access to military-grade weaponry).

I know that most white supremacists implicitly believe that other races are inferior. That is a demonstrably false belief, but it is not prosecutable.

When they go from that belief to the belief that violence and other illegal acts are justified against other races, then a case can be made for legal action. Hate speech is comparatively unregulated in the US though, so there would have to be a lot of changes before you could do anything without an “imminent threat.” And with all branches of the government in GOP control, change is unlikely to happen. There must be major political progress (which must usually spring from cultural progress first in order to be effective).

oxbow

(2,034 posts)
10. No I dont
Sat Feb 17, 2018, 08:32 PM
Feb 2018

Name-calling is not a solution. It only makes the subject feel worse, and feel defensive. Which makes it less likely they’ll listen to any good points you might have.

A white supremacist is just like you. Somewhere along the way, something happened to mess their world up. Maybe they had some people who put some bad programming into them, or something bad happened to them and they took the wrong lessons from it.

There are lots of people working for solutions, for new ways of talking with them that don’t dehumanize or make them feel less than. Christian Picciolini comes to mind; he is a former white supremacist and I really liked the way he spoke with Richard Spencer:

vimeo.com/229466308

(Though I do hate the use of the word “healing”.)

WestIndianArchie

(386 posts)
11. Got it
Sat Feb 17, 2018, 08:40 PM
Feb 2018

It sounds to me like you are attempting to defend homegrown racist/white supremacist terrorists. You are right name calling is not the solution rounding them up and treating them like the criminals they are, that's the solution. take a look here

https://www.alternet.org/lone-wolf-network-biggest-terror-threat-americans-isis

Something must be done.

oxbow

(2,034 posts)
12. You can never round them all up
Sat Feb 17, 2018, 08:54 PM
Feb 2018

If you start monitoring online hate speech, they will just find another way to organize. Look at how the War on Terror has gone: the response of the US to 9/11 has only led to more resistance, more recruitment and more violence.

Fear and hate cannot defeat fear and hate. No matter how many of your fellow human beings you lock up, it will not solve the issue of ignorance in the human mind and hate in the heart. I would like to see hate-speech laws that do a better job of protecting people, but that doesn’t address the root causes in any way that I can see, friend.

WestIndianArchie

(386 posts)
13. ok
Sat Feb 17, 2018, 09:13 PM
Feb 2018

OK, I want to round them up to the last man. You want to defend them and make excuses as to why it can't be done. Let's leave it there.

WestIndianArchie

(386 posts)
15. 2008
Sat Feb 17, 2018, 09:29 PM
Feb 2018

I've been here since 2008, I logged in one day and everything was gone. It looks like I've been lurking for 10 years. lol

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WaPo (10/17) - Federal go...