Stein is all about her and nothing about her party. ConWoman!

We need to unite to offset the well-organized, well funded GOP, at least until we swing from far right destructive Congress Back to at a minimum centered, cooperative bipartisan Congress.

Unless we had changes to our voting system like runoff voting, we have a 2-party system. One of the 2 major party candidates will win. Period. You vote for the one that is closest to your views. A protest vote is a vote for the other guy.

I begged all I knew to NOT VOTE THIRD PARTY for the reason you mention.

Any political party that only exists for a few months every four years is a joke.

There's nothing that Jill Stein did, or can do, that make that 'party' any more worthless in this country than it's always been.

In my opinion, the people that voted for Stein in the last election acted just as stupidly (probably more stupidly) than the dupes who voted for Trump because they thought it would be a good idea to have an outsider shake things up.

it over to spread misinformation. Good questions might be about funding, board of directors, political affiliations; outcomes.

Otherwise, what else are we to believe?

She ran a gawd-awful campaign. Even worse than the Libertarians. And continues to be an idiot.

I really don't see the Greens as a viable choice in this country, at least not at anything beyond the local eleven. Which, given the fight we are in with the GOP, is a good thing.

They’ve had 20 years since Ralphie-boy’s 1996 run to build an effective liberal-left voting bloc. How have they spent that time?

After two decades, they only have about 150 elected office holders, all at local level and half in California. The handful who have ever won statewide office on their ticket either switched parties or lost their next election.

In the 4 years between Ralphie’s 1996 and 2000 runs neither he nor the party worked on building their base, nor cooperate with other parties where they could.

By 2000 they’d shown they couldn’t get anything done. And they continued to prove it in every subsequent election by continuing to display their ineffectualness.

When they’re firing on all pistons, the Greens’ problem is that they want to be the lefty party in parliament, in a country that doesn’t use a parliamentary system. Given that most of the time they’re not firing on all pistons, they succumb to a common failing: the membership is only lightly engaged so the leadership falls under a small claque that says the right things to get enough support to get into the top position. And then it’s the claque’s toy.

That’s why she’s not gone.

I really believed they had an important mission.
Now it is clear they have a devious mission and are impotent.

Her actions and words tell us what the Green party stands for.