Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

struggle4progress

(118,350 posts)
Tue Feb 20, 2018, 12:29 AM Feb 2018

Florida mayors face $5000 fines if they enact gun control

BY ELIZABETH KOH
Herald/Times Tallahassee Bureau
February 19, 2018 10:27 PM

South Miami Mayor Philip Stoddard may be one of the most liberal mayors in Florida, so he would be a natural candidate to push through a package of local gun-control rules in the wake of the Parkland massacre 50 miles away. But that would be against the law.

Florida bans cities and counties from imposing their own gun-control rules. Seven years ago, the Republican-controlled Legislature even created a $5,000 fine it can impose on mayors like Stoddard if they ever try to enforce stricter regulations on firearms.

“I think it’s outrageous,” said Stoddard ...

http://www.bradenton.com/news/state/article201017014.html

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Florida mayors face $5000 fines if they enact gun control (Original Post) struggle4progress Feb 2018 OP
Is it a onetime fine? herding cats Feb 2018 #1
Good idea, herding! Cha Feb 2018 #3
Wed only need a few wealthy big names to match monies and wed have it in a snap. herding cats Feb 2018 #4
Very doable.. screw the repub Cha Feb 2018 #5
paging Michael Bloomberg crazycatlady Feb 2018 #10
Donations to the fine could collect $5000 in 10 minutes. Lil Missy Feb 2018 #2
It's called state preemption and most states have it to unify laws. aikoaiko Feb 2018 #6
I thought Republicans liked local control gratuitous Feb 2018 #7
Rick Scott cares about children.................bullshit Angry Dragon Feb 2018 #8
This is astounding and I don't know how it's legal, like other restrictions appalachiablue Feb 2018 #9

herding cats

(19,568 posts)
1. Is it a onetime fine?
Tue Feb 20, 2018, 12:35 AM
Feb 2018

If so, I think it would be easy to crowdsource the cash to cover them. The entire process would in turn help shine a light on this outrageous law.

herding cats

(19,568 posts)
4. Wed only need a few wealthy big names to match monies and wed have it in a snap.
Tue Feb 20, 2018, 12:54 AM
Feb 2018

I think it’s a doable thing.

Mahalo, Cha!

aikoaiko

(34,183 posts)
6. It's called state preemption and most states have it to unify laws.
Tue Feb 20, 2018, 01:02 AM
Feb 2018

It's not the fine that deters mayors, but rather the local laws were be defeated in courts easily.


790.33?Field of regulation of firearms and ammunition preempted.—
(1)?PREEMPTION.—Except as expressly provided by the State Constitution or general law, the Legislature hereby declares that it is occupying the whole field of regulation of firearms and ammunition, including the purchase, sale, transfer, taxation, manufacture, ownership, possession, storage, and transportation thereof, to the exclusion of all existing and future county, city, town, or municipal ordinances or any administrative regulations or rules adopted by local or state government relating thereto. Any such existing ordinances, rules, or regulations are hereby declared null and void.
(2)?POLICY AND INTENT.—
(a)?It is the intent of this section to provide uniform firearms laws in the state; to declare all ordinances and regulations null and void which have been enacted by any jurisdictions other than state and federal, which regulate firearms, ammunition, or components thereof; to prohibit the enactment of any future ordinances or regulations relating to firearms, ammunition, or components thereof unless specifically authorized by this section or general law; and to require local jurisdictions to enforce state firearms laws.
(b)?It is further the intent of this section to deter and prevent the violation of this section and the violation of rights protected under the constitution and laws of this state related to firearms, ammunition, or components thereof, by the abuse of official authority that occurs when enactments are passed in violation of state law or under color of local or state authority.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
7. I thought Republicans liked local control
Tue Feb 20, 2018, 01:10 AM
Feb 2018

But, of course, when the locals do something Republicans don't like, then it's up to the next highest level that will do what Republicans like. Same thing happens when local school boards decide they don't want to make their students freely available to military recruiters. In that case, they threaten whatever federal dollars the school district might be getting. Tight budgets can make or break a district that loses its federal dollars.

As for a citywide firearm regulation, unless we're to return to the days of walled citadels, firearms would freely pass the urban boundary, making any regulation quite as ineffective as Chicago's regulations. Firearms manufacturers need only flood the surrounding area with guns, and they'd find their way into South Miami.

appalachiablue

(41,174 posts)
9. This is astounding and I don't know how it's legal, like other restrictions
Tue Feb 20, 2018, 04:14 PM
Feb 2018

from the Fla. Governor- state employees can't use the word 'climate change' and other terms.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Florida mayors face $5000...