...to protect themselves from "tyrannical government!" My response: You cannot kill a GOVERNMENT with a rifle--you can only kill PEOPLE!

If they want to protect themselves from a tyrannical government, they should exercise their right to VOTE--wisely. NOT their so-called "right" to kill someone.

Probably the most fucking ridiculous argument for gun ownership ever devised by the mind of morons, with no concept of nation state power.

I'll see their semi-auto pea shooter and raise you a predator drone and a pair of hellfire missiles.

Sometimes I wonder how these people survive. Surely there must be thousands of people wanting to put them out of everyone's misery on a daily basis.

she seems to lack basic human decency

It's a Republican/NRA thing.

I think it would have happened if Dukakis had won in 1988. Imagine Tribe instead of Clarence Thomas?

I know some of these right wingers are outright despicable, disgusting, immoral people.

But, you know, when we win back the House and Senate in November, we've got to get back to a more civil pattern of discussion.

Even if they are not civil, we need to do that. We can still fight hard and point out their disgraceful behavior, but we need to clean things up a bit. 45 brings out the worst in everyone.

"people" he would be dead on (pun intended).

Automatic weapons should be accessible to the military only.

Bump stocks and other devices to turn semi-automatic weapons into automatic weapons should be outlawed.

Do you agree?