General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMy phone was caught up in a wiretap in California
I received a form letter yesterday from the District Attorney in Ventura County. It says electronic communications were intercepted during an investigation and I either had a conversation with or received a call from someone who was the target of a wiretap (I didnt even know they still used the term wiretap sounds like something Trump would say oh, yeah, because he did when he accused Obama of illegally wiretapping him).
I dont know if it was my home phone or my cell. The letter says the investigation resulted in the arrest of persons for unlawful transfer of firearms and narcotics-related offenses. It also lists the dates of the wiretap (10-25-17 to 11-25-17). I checked the call history on both the house and cell phones during that period and there are no calls from or to anyone in California. The letter doesnt state who was arrested either. I dont know anyone who currently lives in Ventura County. I live In New Orleans.
Has anyone ever had this experience? I find it amusing. I'm not the least bit worried, but I would like to know who was arrested. I would call the DA to ask, but the letter doesn't even list a case number. Weird!
marylandblue
(12,344 posts)But a lot of spam calls use spoofed numbers, so you wouldn't necessarily know if California called you.
fleur-de-lisa
(14,628 posts)But I assume that if a spammer was arrested it would be for fraud or a related charge. The letter says "firearms and narcotics".
I guess if you are a spammer it's not outside the realm of possiblity that you would be involved in other illegal activity.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)hlthe2b
(102,381 posts)Maybe call the DA's office to see if the person who signed the letter actually works there. If so, maybe you could ask to speak with them or someone in that office.
fleur-de-lisa
(14,628 posts)Erin Meister, Senior Deputy District Attorny. So she is legit.
If there was a case number or if the defendent was named, I would call.
hlthe2b
(102,381 posts)Pfishing and spoof correspondence has gotten really creative and disturbingly sophisticated.
dalton99a
(81,599 posts)From a different Calif. county:
http://www.bakersfield.com/news/d-a-defends-policy/article_01a02482-4577-5ca0-9e11-dca1c7978dcb.html
And though Bakersfield recipients of recent wiretap notices complain that the letters are vague about who is being criminally investigated, the District Attorney's office says that's not going to change.
The notifications, which go out to dozens or sometimes hundreds of people each year in Kern County, have caused anxiety among recipients and raised ethical concerns over what the notices don't say. ....
Penal Code 629.68 allows recipients of Notification of Interception letters to file a motion with a judge to view a transcript of their intercepted communication.