General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump tweeting an attack on the "Special Council" this morning (quoting Dershowitz)
Two tweets, now out of order because he apparently reposted what had been the first one...but however he might have revised it, he didn't catch the misspelling of counsel. Which suggests Cheeto is tweeting these himself, unless someone else who can't spell is helping him.
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Editing to add a tweet replying to the first link above, which shows the errors in the first version that Trump caught -- he'd misspelled whether as wether and typed the twice ("the the selection" ):
Link to tweet
Vinca
(50,302 posts)highplainsdem
(49,025 posts)ck4829
(35,082 posts)Takket
(21,611 posts)And not the thousands of other talking heads that have supported mueller
highplainsdem
(49,025 posts)Horizens
(637 posts)Wasn't he the guy that defended OJ by getting the jury to focus on the fact-finders rather than the facts?
It's the OJ Simpson defense.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)and one I haven't thought of before When your client is guilty, you put the "cops" on trial.
hlthe2b
(102,340 posts)Is this a recent statement Trump is latching onto (for dear life)?
highplainsdem
(49,025 posts)show on Fox Business last night, according to this article:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/trump-quotes-alan-dershowitz-saying-hes-still-opposed-to-naming-robert-mueller-as-special-counsel
Dershowitz had made similar comments on Fox News, their America's Newsroom morning program, hours earlier, but he also said then that there was no reason to fire Mueller. I'm guessing Trump missed, or chose to ignore, that comment.
http://insider.foxnews.com/2018/03/20/alan-dershowitz-president-trump-tweets-special-counsel-robert-mueller-russia-probe
ProfessorGAC
(65,138 posts)Third person including the title? What a maniac.
Cha
(297,513 posts)make sure I wasn't hallucinating.. lol
highplainsdem
(49,025 posts)ProfessorGAC
(65,138 posts)And, as i should have expected, to dumb to use quotation marks.
unblock
(52,298 posts)Mr. Ected
(9,670 posts)an investigation?
That's certainly not the standard and Dershowitz knows it.
It takes probable cause to ARREST someone, conduct a SEARCH, or to SEIZE one's property.
Apples and oranges, but the FOX crowd gobbles it up like red meat.
Cha
(297,513 posts)He's willing to ruin his rep for trump.. or did he even have one?
Why does he say there was no probable cause?