Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCongress Snuck New Russia Sanctions Into Spending Bill, president threatening to veto
Shhhhhh
Congress Snuck New Russia Sanctions Into Spending Bill
Congress wants to be sure that the United States keeps the pressure on Russia, with or without the presidents help.
Buried in the massive $1.3 trillion spending bill that Congress is considering this week are strict new punishments against Russia, in what lawmakers and aides say is a message to President Donald Trump to reconsider his relaxed posture toward Moscow.
The legislation, which Trump was always expected to sign, includes restrictions that bar many federal agencies from engaging financially or otherwise with the Kremlin and its backers on a number of fronts. Lawmakers from both parties viewed those provisions and others as an opportunity to enshrine new punishments against Vladimir Putins regime at a time when the Trump administration has taken heat for its refusal to immediately and fully implement mandatory sanctions and other punishments.
Those [sanctions] were a good first step. But I do think that these newer sanctions hopefully put a little more bite to it. And frankly I think thats a good thing, Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.) told The Daily Beast. The Russians are guilty of bad behavior all over the world. And so we shouldnt be doing anything to encourage or condone that.
The new measures come as the White House faces renewed criticism over its handling of Russia. Earlier this week, The Washington Post reported that the president, against the advice of his top aides, congratulated Putin on winning re-election to another six-year term. He also did not press Putin on election-meddling or on the nerve-agent attack on a former Russian spy in the United Kingdom.
More: https://www.thedailybeast.com/congress-snuck-new-russia-sanctions-into-spending-bill?via=twitter_page&__twitter_impression=true
Congress Snuck New Russia Sanctions Into Spending Bill
Congress wants to be sure that the United States keeps the pressure on Russia, with or without the presidents help.
Buried in the massive $1.3 trillion spending bill that Congress is considering this week are strict new punishments against Russia, in what lawmakers and aides say is a message to President Donald Trump to reconsider his relaxed posture toward Moscow.
The legislation, which Trump was always expected to sign, includes restrictions that bar many federal agencies from engaging financially or otherwise with the Kremlin and its backers on a number of fronts. Lawmakers from both parties viewed those provisions and others as an opportunity to enshrine new punishments against Vladimir Putins regime at a time when the Trump administration has taken heat for its refusal to immediately and fully implement mandatory sanctions and other punishments.
Those [sanctions] were a good first step. But I do think that these newer sanctions hopefully put a little more bite to it. And frankly I think thats a good thing, Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.) told The Daily Beast. The Russians are guilty of bad behavior all over the world. And so we shouldnt be doing anything to encourage or condone that.
The new measures come as the White House faces renewed criticism over its handling of Russia. Earlier this week, The Washington Post reported that the president, against the advice of his top aides, congratulated Putin on winning re-election to another six-year term. He also did not press Putin on election-meddling or on the nerve-agent attack on a former Russian spy in the United Kingdom.
More: https://www.thedailybeast.com/congress-snuck-new-russia-sanctions-into-spending-bill?via=twitter_page&__twitter_impression=true
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
10 replies, 1264 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Congress Snuck New Russia Sanctions Into Spending Bill, president threatening to veto (Original Post)
MelissaB
Mar 2018
OP
Is this the real reason that Schumer praised Trump's China sanctions yesterday?
FakeNoose
Mar 2018
#8
Zoonart
(11,871 posts)1. The pResident just tweeted that he may VETO the bill.
He is using the DACA kids, of all things, and his border wall as the reasons, but perhaps ^^^^^^^^^^this^^^^^^^^^ is the real reason.
MelissaB
(16,420 posts)3. Great minds
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)4. Yes, that is the real reason
and, even if he signs the ball, he just won't implement the sanctions and Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell will do nothing
MelissaB
(16,420 posts)2. Could explain why Trump is threatening to veto
Link to tweet
I am considering a VETO of the Omnibus Spending Bill based on the fact that the 800,000 plus DACA recipients have been totally abandoned by the Democrats (not even mentioned in Bill) and the BORDER WALL, which is desperately needed for our National Defense, is not fully funded.
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)6. curious how Democrats would get DACA into the bill
when it's the GOP that controls the agenda.
dalton99a
(81,526 posts)5. No traitor, no traitor
Jarqui
(10,126 posts)7. It could be a tough decision for Donald ...
Veto sanctions against Russia and shutdown the government or view the world wide premier of the Pee Pee tape?
Country last for the Donald.
FakeNoose
(32,652 posts)8. Is this the real reason that Schumer praised Trump's China sanctions yesterday?
I think Schumer is buttering him up to sign this Omnibus bill, and he has his own reasons for doing that.
Schumer has played this game before, and so has Pelosi.
Cha
(297,323 posts)9. Veto you russian Mole
mountain grammy
(26,626 posts)10. This is why he's threatening to veto.
Red don, the fucking scumbag.