General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums4 theories on what Mueller telling Trump hes not a target means (A must read)
https://www.vox.com/2018/4/4/17197128/mueller-trump-target<snip>
The new report that special counsel Robert Mueller has told Trumps team that the president is not a target in his investigation but is, instead, a subject has set off a frenzy of speculation in the political world.
Is it good news for Trump on the legal front? Or is that just what Mueller wants Trump to think, as he negotiates for a sit-down interview? Or is it a mere statement of the obvious, given the Justice Departments view that a sitting president cant be indicted? Or is it a fairly straightforward statement of how Mueller views the investigation one thats subject to change?
The questions have sprung out of the Washington Posts Carol Leonnig and Robert Costas Tuesday night report on Muellers communication to Trumps legal team, which occurred in early March during negotiations about the president potentially sitting for an interview.
It is important to keep the sourcing for the Posts scoop in mind. The reporting describes what Muellers team is said to have told Trumps team. Its sources appear to be from the Trump side. So obviously, it should not be viewed as an entirely reliable window into Muellers own strategy.
....more at link above
unblock
(52,309 posts)does s/he "like" me?
or does s/he "like like" me?
i mean, as a friend?
or as more than a friend?
will s/he go to the prom with me?
ohhhhhhhhwa!
i can't stand not knowning!
kentuck
(111,110 posts)What can Mueller do?
I think he should subpoena him before the Grand Jury and force him to take it to Court. I think this is a landmark decision awaiting the Supreme Court.
Nitram
(22,861 posts)My question is, what exactly is the legal definition of a target as opposed to a subject of an investigation? According to the article at the link, a target is "someone about whom investigators have substantial evidence that ties them to a crime, and who is a putative defendant (someone likely to face charges)." Given this definition, Mueller doesn't start with substantial evidence against Trump. In classic prosecutorial style, he is using Trump's close associates to gather that evidence.
A subject is someone whose conduct is within the scope of the investigation basically, someone whos under scrutiny. That clearly doesn't let Trump off the hook. So technically, Trump is not a target. Yet!
kentuck
(111,110 posts)"It is important to keep the sourcing for the Posts scoop in mind. The reporting describes what Muellers team is said to have told Trumps team. Its sources appear to be from the Trump side. So obviously, it should not be viewed as an entirely reliable window into Muellers own strategy."