General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe film "Chappaquiddick" distorts a tragedy
Link to tweet
Laurence Tribe: "The obvious purpose is to slow or stop a certain meteoric political career. Lets hope that tawdry aim is transparent to all and that it dooms the effort."
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/06/opinion/chappaquiddick-ted-kennedy-distortortion.html
By Neal Gabler
Mr. Gabler is writing a biography of Edward Kennedy.
April 6, 2018
Senator Edward Kennedy, one of the most famous members of Americas most famous family, understood that he belonged as much to popular culture as to political culture. Now, nine years after his death, comes a movie about the event that, almost as much as the circumstances of his birth, established him in the tabloid pantheon: Chappaquiddick.
The film, by the same name, opened Friday and retells the story of an accident in July 1969, on the titular Massachusetts island near Marthas Vineyard, in which Mr. Kennedy drove off a bridge, killing his passenger, Mary Jo Kopechne, a campaign worker for his late brother Robert. It has been heavily promoted by conservative media outlets, and reviewers across the political spectrum have praised what they deem its damning but factual approach. Damning it is; factual it is not.
Lets set aside the fact that, despite the films advertisements claiming to tell the untold true story of a cover-up, the story has been told plenty, and no one but the most lunatic conspiracy theorists see this as anything but a tragic accident in which nothing much was covered up. Lets also put aside the skein of conjecture and outright fabrication that the film unspools in one scene Joe Kennedy, the family patriarch, murmurs alibi to his son, like a Mafia don, when in fact he was so debilitated by a stroke that he could only babble incoherently. Setting all this aside, the movie nevertheless raises a serious issue.
What is the relationship of fact to fiction, of the historical to the histrionic in art and entertainment? Ted Kennedy was a real man living out a real life. His political opponents could and did distort that life for their advantage. But just how many liberties can an artist or entertainer take when he or she deploys a biographical subject?
SNIP
radical noodle
(8,003 posts)I remember at the time most people I knew thought he didn't call police because he was driving drunk.
I saw something about this on a new/talk show but didn't pay much attention since it's long past now. I'd rather they let him RIP, as I think he tried to make his amends.
jcmaine72
(1,773 posts)I refuse to watch it and hope the dishonest, hate-filled propagandists involved in producing this rancid turd are never permitted to make another film again.
notdarkyet
(2,226 posts)Leader. Saw they have come out with the real truth of all JFKs women. Deflect, deflect.
SunSeeker
(51,574 posts)When Republicans could have given these film makers enough material in just the last 49 hours.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)SunSeeker
(51,574 posts)MichMan
(11,938 posts)pnwmom
(108,980 posts)SunSeeker
(51,574 posts)I'm not referring to Ted's kids.
csziggy
(34,136 posts)Left Bavaria to avoid his military service. After living with his brother and working as a barber for a while he moved to the Northwest. He made his fortune operating boom-town restaurants and boarding houses in Seattle and the mining town Monte Cristo, and in the Klondike Gold Rush.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_Trump#Immigration_to_the_United_States
The Arctic House was one of the largest and most extravagant restaurants in that region of the Klondike, offering fresh fruit and ptarmigan in addition to the staple of horsemeat.[10] The Arctic was open 24 hours a day and advertised "Rooms for ladies", which included beds and scales for measuring gold dust. The local Canadian Mounties were known to tolerate vice so long as it was conducted discreetly.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_Trump#Role_in_Yukon_gold_rush
Since he continued that business model in Mote Cristo and the Klondike, a good argument is that Frederick Trump ran brothels.
He then returned to Germany, married a woman much younger than himself and returned to New York. After a few years his wife wanted to return to Germany so they did in 1896 but Frederick was deported because of his avoidance of military service as a young man.
During his later years in New York he continued to operate hotels - I wonder if his pattern of running brothels continued in the big city? If so that could be when the family's connection to the Mob began.
I think it would make a good movie, showing the origin of the ruthlessness and immorality that continues in the Trump family today.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)That would be more to the moment, but I don't think we'll be seeing Trump Towering Inferno anytime soon ...
Bucky
(54,027 posts)Oh my God, Democrats have scandals too!!!
Tipperary
(6,930 posts)Wiener, Clinton, Edwards come to mind.
struggle4progress
(118,295 posts)Only her hairdresser knows for sure!
And just what about all those inexplicable relationships between the Benghazi conspiracy and the assassination of Abraham Lincoln? We thought about it so you don't have to! You won't want to miss our blockbuster exposé: The Pizza Parlor Files! Tomorrow night!
SunSeeker
(51,574 posts)ucrdem
(15,512 posts)I haven't seen the ads but at this point I don't need to see them to know exactly what this is and who's behind it. We've been to this rodeo many times.
Cha
(297,323 posts)about President Obama. BULLSHITE
struggle4progress
(118,295 posts)Nobody is left who could tell us exactly how it happened
One dark night, he drove off an unsafe narrow old bridge, almost before he was completely on it, perhaps for no reason except it was angled to the road on the shore and still without guardrails then, though rails were added later, and the car sank in the water
So it was a tragedy, like every other death in an automotive accident -- there have been at least a million and a half, maybe two million, of those in the years since then
MichMary
(1,714 posts)--that wasn't reported to the police for something like 10 hours. The diver who brought her up thought she had survived for hours in an air pocket, slowly suffocating while waiting for help that wasn't coming.
Response to MichMary (Reply #9)
Post removed
MichMary
(1,714 posts)I wonder if things have changed that much since then.
Tag team.
janterry
(4,429 posts)But I also like the idea that a flawed man (and he was that) was also able to do some good.
Too often we lock folks up and throw away the key (literally or figuratively, as in, you can't hold this job or have this career...ever.....because of what you did).
Kennedy found some level of redemption (doing good in his career) - in part - because he was a Kennedy (money and education behind him).
I've worked with so many folks who have no money and very little in the way of education. When we toss them in prison, we expect that they will never really be redeemed (we hope when they get out, they tow the line. But we don't expect to look up to them, in the future).
So, I think there are lessons about redemption (redeeming ones life), in this story - too.
MichMary
(1,714 posts)many decades. He undoubtedly would have been President, maybe as early as 1972, and he would have been one of the greats. I'm sure that he regretted Chappaquiddick every day of his life after that.
So many of our institutions that should be benefiting the poor--mental health, justice, etc.--need to be restructured. It will take decades of Democratic administrations AND control of Congress to do all that is needed. Unfortunately, the way the system is set up, progress is limited.
Tag team?
yardwork
(61,650 posts)I have no idea. Do you?
MichMary
(1,714 posts)yardwork
(61,650 posts)we can all speculate about the cause of death; however what is a fact is that Senator Kennedy didn't report the accident for 10 hours. Whether she could have been saved or not, failing to report an accident (especially when there is a dead body in the car) is something most of us wouldn't get away with.
rockfordfile
(8,704 posts)Eliot Rosewater
(31,112 posts)MichMary
(1,714 posts)We can't discuss facts here? We can't admit that one of our heroes did something inexplicable? We can't acknowledge that this particular liberal hero was a beneficiary of a particular privilege that only a minuscule number of people have?
There is a huge difference between the FACT that I posted and what passes for "facts" on Fox News.
flotsam
(3,268 posts)...here's a different scenario:
A BBC Inside Story episode, "Chappaquiddick," broadcast on the 25th anniversary of Kopechne's death, advanced a theory that Kennedy and Kopechne had left the party in Kennedy's car, but when Kennedy saw an off-duty policeman in his patrol car, he got out of the car, fearing the political consequences of being discovered by the police late at night with an attractive woman. According to the theory, Kennedy then returned to the party, and Kopechne, unfamiliar both with the large car and the local area, drove the wrong way and crashed off the bridge. The episode argued that the explanation would account for Kennedy's lack of concern the next morning, as he was unaware of the crash, and for the forensic evidence of the injuries to Kopechne being inconsistent with her sitting in the passenger seat.[61]
Writer Jack Olsen had earlier advanced a similar theory in his book The Bridge at Chappaquiddick, published early in 1970. Olsen's book was the first full-length examination of the case. Olsen wrote that Kopechne's shorter height (she was 5 ft 2 in (1.57 m), a foot (30 cm) shorter than Kennedy) could have accounted for her possibly not even seeing the bridge, as she drove Kennedy's car over unfamiliar roads, at night, with no external lighting, after she had consumed several alcoholic drinks at the party both had attended. Olsen wrote that Kopechne normally drove a smaller Volkswagen model car, which was much lighter and easier to handle than Kennedy's larger Oldsmobile.[27]
For a deeper dive:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chappaquiddick_incident
MichMary
(1,714 posts)but, is contradicted by the Senator's own statement. When he made that statement he would have been very aware that he was kissing his presidential aspiration good bye. He could have claimed he wasn't in the car (she took it without his knowledge, he lent it to her to get back to her hotel, whatever) and that wouldn't have implicated him in the crime of leaving the scene of an accident in which a person had died. By the time he made the statement, he knew what had happened, and certainly was smart enough to foresee the consequences of his statement.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)For example, they have the grandfather calling for an alibi. He had actually had a stroke that left him unable to communicate.
And the timing is odd, with a young Kennedy male once again making a mark as a politician.
MichMary
(1,714 posts)that work on this movie started years ago. It would be interesting to know who provided the financing. Byron Allen had something to do with it. Don't know his politics.
Tipperary
(6,930 posts)most of us would not.
MichMary
(1,714 posts)you will probably be attacked for posting that.
But, yeah, can you imagine what would have happened to a poor person who did that?
struggle4progress
(118,295 posts)It happened a long time now: Mary Jo and Ted have both been dead for years
OKNancy
(41,832 posts)The creeps are trying to smear Joe with the actions of his great uncle. Joe is squeaky clean so they have to pull out something.
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)are a danger to republicans, especially the smart, eloquent Joe. Somehow, this will be his fault.
yardwork
(61,650 posts)Guilded Lilly
(5,591 posts)The current young Joe Kennedy.
I dont know about the political leanings of the film makers but this is coming off as a salacious smear against the Kennedy name (one already well documented)when a bright young Kennedy star is on the horizon.
They (or someone)are scared of him.
And Caroline.
spanone
(135,844 posts)Le Gaucher
(1,547 posts)Her house is about a mile from mine.
There is an active topic on my town's forum on Facebook
People are calling Ted Kennedy all sorts of names. Retired cops are weighing on him saying he is guilty and should have stood trial.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)they NEVER stop smearing - they have proved it can payoff decades later now.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)Can't remember where, but a short blurb suggested that it is about protective machinery. Most people in similar situations do face consequences. In that sense it explains the long-standing protective mechanism that begins with young men considered to have great potential. Whether the producers have an agenda or not, it is still a story of affluenza.
Tipperary
(6,930 posts)Facing facts about his irresponsible behavior does not mean anyone is attacking his memory.
He was a great senator.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)The story begs some useful questions that even he might have entertained at some point. How much talent and good work has been lost when a youth who are not surrounded by enough wealth or power to get them out of a minor drug charge? It's a story relevant to recent events and how we have been rethinking with me too.
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)Is he saying this is a hit job to affect the future of U.S. Representative Joseph Kennedy III (D-MA),
a great-nephew of President John F. Kennedy and Senator Ted Kennedy ?
I'm unsure how many people care what happened decades ago to his 'great-uncle' would apply it to today's Kennedy.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)that will cling like dogshit to the boots of any Democrat who dares to run for office in a contested race, including Joe. For that purpose, it doesn't matter how many see the movie, as the promotional campaign is sufficient to open the throttle on the swiftboat.
Hekate
(90,714 posts)ucrdem
(15,512 posts)I'm guessing it will bounce from cable to broadcast to youtube etc clear up until Nov. 2020, with accompanying promotion wherever it's "needed." Clearly profit is not the motive here. Another day, another swiftboat special.
Eliot Rosewater
(31,112 posts)They HATE the Clinton's
They HATE the Kennedy's
Wait for it
"no more dynasties, we dont need them" crap, this CRAP will be EVERYWHERE
the BASHING has begun on the young Kennedy, which will of course make me support him more.
ALSO note who poo poo's this move, implying it really wont have any negative impact. NOTE those folks. NOTE THEM
Yes, this issue will tell us mucho about who supports this party and who does NOT
rockfordfile
(8,704 posts)Who financed it?
underpants
(182,829 posts)Production Companies
Apex Entertainment
Chimney (in association with)
DMG Entertainment
Film i Väst (in association with)
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt5270948/companycredits
peggysue2
(10,832 posts)Haven't seen the film, so I can't comment on the distortion aspect. But the timing is not coincidental, particularly when there's a rising star from the Kennedy clan. The Kennedy name still carries clout, a powerful aspect about which the GOP is all too aware. What better way to tarnish that name than resurrecting Chappaquiddick.
Opponents can't go after JFK or Bobby Kennedy without risking massive public disgust and outcry. Ted Kennedy has always been fair game from the GOP's perspective and Chappaquiddick has always been the rallying cry. When Ted Kennedy died, the blog posts from Republican critics were afire with this stuff. It was thoroughly disgusting.
That being said, the reviews I've read paint an interesting character study, the last brother following three tragic family deaths, the son deemed the weakest link in a family that had wielded power and respect, even fear at the highest levels.
Of course, if the slant is distorted than that value at the human level will be lost.
Bucky
(54,027 posts)...and the acclaimed director of "That Curséd Embargo of 1807"
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Followed by a Monica Lewinsky miniseries.
CountAllVotes
(20,876 posts)Why keep dragging this old crap through the wringer, over and over and over again!
Chemisse
(30,813 posts)No matter what your thoughts are on the Chappaquiddick tragedy, no matter who was at fault or how it all came about, this has nothing to do with anyone who is alive today.
Yet the GOP will shamelessly smear the younger Kennedy until half their followers think HE was the one who was in the car that night! They need to be called out on this.
KPN
(15,646 posts)It's an offensive defense against the GOP's tawdry corruption and vileness being exposed by the Trump regime's inept machinations. It's a counter attack on the Democratic Party and all Democrats and liberals as a whole.
We will see more of this in the months and year or so ahead. Mark my words. CNN's American Dynasty: The Kennedy's is doing another good job of creating bad impressions of Democrats in my opinion.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)CentralMass
(15,265 posts)went on to beome, inarguably IMO, the greatest Senator of modern history. He was a prolific author and coauthor of landmark legislation.
http://blogs.findlaw.com/law_and_life/2009/08/senator-ted-kennedys-legislative-legacy.html
"He (cast) 15,235 votes in the Senate. (Had) 2500 bills authored. 552 cosponsored pieces of legislation passed into law.:
His history as a U.S. Senator was built one vote, one bill, and one act at a time. Here is a sampling of a few of the many laws he helped bring to bear:
Civil Rights Act of 1964
Immigration Act of 1965
Voting Rights Act Extension of 1970
Women, Infants, and Children Nutrition Program of 1972 (WIC)
Civil Rights Commission Act Amendments of 1978
Refugee Act of 1980
Voting Rights Act Amendments of 1982
Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987
Immigration Act of 1990
Civil Rights Act of 1991
Violence Against Women Act of 1994
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001
Bioterrorism Preparedness Act of 2002
Enhanced Border Security and Visa Reform Act of 2002
Matthew Shepard Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2007
Civil Rights Act of 2008
Senator Kennedy chose to define his political identity in the vision of health care reform. His dream was to provide quality, affordable health care options to all Americans and he helped pass landmark legislation in that pursuit.
Medical Device Amendments of 1976
Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) of 1985
Protection and Advocacy for Mentally Ill Individuals Act of 1986
Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Ryan White Comprehensive AIDS Resources Emergency Act of 1990 (Ryan White CARE Act)
National Institutes of Health Revitalization Act of 1993
Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act of 1994
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPPA)
Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997
Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) in 1997
Healthcare Research and Quality Act of 1999
Children's Health Act of 2000
Minority Health and Health Disparities Research and Education Act of 2001
Project BioShield Act of 2003
Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act of 2005
Family Opportunity Act of 2006
Minority Health Improvement and Health Disparity Elimination Act of 2006
FDA Amendments Act of 2007
Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008
"For me, a few hours ago, this campaign came to an end. For all those whose cares have been our concern, the work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives, and the dream shall never die." - Senator Ted Kennedy, 1980, spoken after he withdrew from the 1980 presidential election."
Tatiana
(14,167 posts)designed to suppress Democratic turnout for the midterms and discourage any Presidential aspirations Joe Kennedy III may have.
As such, I encourage all Democrats to stay away from this film and don't help the right wing thugs.